Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah but it's technically still against the law if I buy a gun for my dad for Christmas, sell as a private collection at a gun show or buy a gun off my buddy right. These are seen as straw sales/purchases if not handled by a ffl. if I understand the language. It was obamas attempt at closing the so called gun show loop hole. Most people don't even know this or care. But it still needs overturned.
umm.....you can legally do ALL of those things.......
Well, not in WA, but that's a state law and they are addressing several of the concerns such as the ones you mentioned. They wanted to close loopholes but the way they did it was far too restrictive and they realized that and are unfucking it now.
Just like when we got SBR's, they fucked up the wording on that too and so SBR ownership for most residents got delayed for a year. Unless you happened to be one of those people that bought them the day the law went into effect and before the hoopla like me, and then was put into a gray area for a year... In WA the law can't be interpreted, it has to be read for what it is, and anything missing isn't in the law and anything written is, regardless of how ridiculous or absurd.
Trump has said a lot about a lot... He's a fucking blowhard like all politicians and greedbags, so I only go by their actions. And so far his actions haven't been anti but they haven't exactly been pro yet either. Lots of stuff we want done, such as loosening the regulations on FFL's, national reciprocity, hearing pro act, etc. Maybe later his son will get a chance to influence dad and we'll get something out of it. Sad it's gotten to that point.
Actually, the law has always been there, but Obama, by EO, pushed the issue of redefining the meaning of manufacture beyond the "reasonable and customary meaning" of the word, to include any modification that involves anything other than hand tools basically. To take a pile of parts and assemble them into a functioning firearm, as with an AR build, or screwing on a fully complete barrel, like with the barrel nut setups, is "gunsmithing" according to State, but to drill and tap a fully complete rifle for scope mounts, or to take a complete rifle and chop 6" off the barrel and thread it for a muzzle brake is suddenly defined as "manufacturing". ATF didn't make any changes in that regard to my knowledge, they have always been clear about what it gunsmithing and what is manufacturing, and building and fitting parts to an existing firearm has never been manufacturing according to ATF..... under ITAR though, if you machine a scope ring, or handguard tube, even if it's already a completed part but you need to modify it for some reason...... you better be paying that $2250/ year to the state dept..... even if you only machine one part a year. It's ridiculous that a damn gunsmith has to register with the State Department in order to be allowed to practice his trade even though what he is doing has absolutely zero to do with anything international. Most guns will never leave the STATE they are smithed in, much less get exported for sale to another country. If you're exporting, then by all means, register, but for a local gun shop that threads barrels.....efffing stupid. But hell, I'm preaching to the choir, how the hell do we change that bullshit?I don't think there would be any vote required to do away with the ITAR registration for smiths (if you're talking about the regulation they put in last year). As I remember, that was a pure regulation done from within the ATF, and not a law passed by Congress. If that's the case, he can just sign an EO that reverses it and it's gone.
Actually, the law has always been there, but Obama, by EO, pushed the issue of redefining the meaning of manufacture beyond the "reasonable and customary meaning" of the word, to include any modification that involves anything other than hand tools basically. To take a pile of parts and assemble them into a functioning firearm, as with an AR build, or screwing on a fully complete barrel, like with the barrel nut setups, is "gunsmithing" according to State, but to drill and tap a fully complete rifle for scope mounts, or to take a complete rifle and chop 6" off the barrel and thread it for a muzzle brake is suddenly defined as "manufacturing". ATF didn't make any changes in that regard to my knowledge, they have always been clear about what it gunsmithing and what is manufacturing, and building and fitting parts to an existing firearm has never been manufacturing according to ATF..... under ITAR though, if you machine a scope ring, or handguard tube, even if it's already a completed part but you need to modify it for some reason...... you better be paying that $2250/ year to the state dept..... even if you only machine one part a year. It's ridiculous that a damn gunsmith has to register with the State Department in order to be allowed to practice his trade even though what he is doing has absolutely zero to do with anything international. Most guns will never leave the STATE they are smithed in, much less get exported for sale to another country. If you're exporting, then by all means, register, but for a local gun shop that threads barrels.....efffing stupid. But hell, I'm preaching to the choir, how the hell do we change that bullshit?
Basically, if I work at subway, I can assemble all the sandwiches I want from the precut, prepackaged ingredients provided and I'm performing sandwich smithing duties. But if a customer brings in a foot long and asks me to cut it in half, I'm suddenly manufacturing that sandwich? Or if the slice of ham is to wide for the bread, so I trim it to fit, I'm suddenly a manufacturer. How efffing stupid does that sound? Because that's exactly what Obama's admin did to gunsmiths.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
Actually, the law has always been there, but Obama, by EO, pushed the issue of redefining the meaning of manufacture beyond the "reasonable and customary meaning" of the word, to include any modification that involves anything other than hand tools basically. To take a pile of parts and assemble them into a functioning firearm, as with an AR build, or screwing on a fully complete barrel, like with the barrel nut setups, is "gunsmithing" according to State, but to drill and tap a fully complete rifle for scope mounts, or to take a complete rifle and chop 6" off the barrel and thread it for a muzzle brake is suddenly defined as "manufacturing". ATF didn't make any changes in that regard to my knowledge, they have always been clear about what it gunsmithing and what is manufacturing, and building and fitting parts to an existing firearm has never been manufacturing according to ATF..... under ITAR though, if you machine a scope ring, or handguard tube, even if it's already a completed part but you need to modify it for some reason...... you better be paying that $2250/ year to the state dept..... even if you only machine one part a year. It's ridiculous that a damn gunsmith has to register with the State Department in order to be allowed to practice his trade even though what he is doing has absolutely zero to do with anything international. Most guns will never leave the STATE they are smithed in, much less get exported for sale to another country. If you're exporting, then by all means, register, but for a local gun shop that threads barrels.....efffing stupid. But hell, I'm preaching to the choir, how the hell do we change that bullshit?
Basically, if I work at subway, I can assemble all the sandwiches I want from the precut, prepackaged ingredients provided and I'm performing sandwich smithing duties. But if a customer brings in a foot long and asks me to cut it in half, I'm suddenly manufacturing that sandwich? Or if the slice of ham is to wide for the bread, so I trim it to fit, I'm suddenly a manufacturer. How efffing stupid does that sound? Because that's exactly what Obama's admin did to gunsmiths.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
Problem is, what is unconditional aside from the fact that it's a regulatory change rather than a law? Most of your conservative judges follow the law as written, libtard activist judges have no such ethical obligations, they just rule however they feel, whether it's legal or not.The liberals have shown us how to defeat an EO all we have to do is find a pro Judge willing to go against the anti EO. Much like the libs have done with Trumps travel bans..
As much as you guys might think Obama did to gt rid of the 2A, the prior 3 repub presidents signed many many more laws, actual laws, taking and restricting your 2A rights than that communist POS did. Reagan was the worst, he is why we cant get new full auto rifles right now. That fkr.
You can get a full auto, escpecially in Texas, just do your research. How about some facts about those republican presidents being anti 2 A, or did you forget about Clinton.
I'll give the Trumpster one more year before I write him off like the rest of these shithead scumbag sumbitches. He is doing one thing better than I thought he would do and that is trolling the establishment, now if his socalle d friends in that fkd up lying assed republican party would just do what they said they would do over the past 8 fkn years things would be even better. Repeal the NFA and I will vote party line republican next election, If not, I will contribute $10k to whoever runs against my local RINO Brady.
My question is, how do we go about asking HIM for help?
As much as you guys might think Obama did to gt rid of the 2A, the prior 3 repub presidents signed many many more laws, actual laws, taking and restricting your 2A rights than that communist POS did. Reagan was the worst, he is why we cant get new full auto rifles right now. That fkr.
Fake, no, liberal propaganda and intentionally misleading..... damn right. He didn't sign any restrictive laws because none made it to his desk, thanks to various gun rights groups. What he DID do, since he didn't have the power to legislate, was to REGULATE, or at least attempt to regulate. Remember the attempt to ban green tip 5.56 ammo? Remember his hardcore push to ban "assault weapons" after Sandy Hook? Remember him instructing heads of agencies to look for ways to "reduce gun violence"? That translates into "find a way to keep more people from owning guns"....ie, the Social Security rules that were recently rolled back. Even though he didn't directly sign any laws, and you can damn well put money on it that he would have, given the chance, his rhetoric drove many attempts at gun control on the Federal level, and some states succeeded in actually banning certain weapons.... that wouldn't have happened without Obummer pushing his agenda on the national level.Just point out the mistakes in it. Is it fake or not. A lot of hemming and hawing in this thread.
I didn't say you could get a new machine gun, just pissed on his blanket statement, and while I agree that Texas sucks, you can own full auto in Texas.
If he does nothing else, these two things are light years better than how it could have gone.
[IMG2=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","src":"http:\/\/totalnewswire.com\/files\/2017\/04\/Neil-Gorsuch-sworn-in.jpg?w=600&h=0&zc=1&s=0&a=t&q=89"}[/IMG2]![]()
The jury is still out on Gorsuch, the last good Justice appointed was Thomas and maybe Alito, they have all sucked since, even the repub appointees, Roberts is just a left wing fkn asshole. I am not saying Trump is as bad as that evil kunt but I am saying he hasnt done anything good like getting rid of the NFA and the ATF.