"Different" and "Better" are two separate things entirely.
A long time ago, I wanted to build me a 700-based "sniper rifle" ... I knew I didn't have the money to actually build a credible M24/M40 clone but nevertheless wanted to have a .308 700 'tactical'-style rifle. I was shopping with my Dad on a Friday night, we stopped at a LGS, it was jam packed with customers ... and I happened to notice they were having a big Leupold sale ... and after checking out a few with an actually very-helpful LGS employee (Imagine that!) - I absolutely fell in love with , if I recall correctly, a Leupold VX-3i 4.5-14x40mm "Boone & Crockett" reticle rifle-scope ... it was a ridiculously good deal (at the time) and I thought the glass & quality seemed great, obviously big name recognition, and for some reason I was just drawn to the reticle (I was young and not very experienced nor knowledgeable ... I had also bought a few Nikons with their BDC Reticle and thought using their Spot-On App with the BDC Reticle was awesome...) - and the salesman quite accurately pointed out to me ... "You putting this on a hunting rifle right?" ... No... "... A .22LR for just-for-fun-shooting??" ... No, building a half-aced 'sniper rifle' ... "ohh... well to be honest, I'd love to sell it to you, but it will be useless on a tactical rifle with that reticle , to be honest... This is a hunting rifle scope, that reticle is designed for hunters..." OHH...
And of course, he was right. Could I have used it, sure... Just like you can use a Mil-Dot reticle for Hog Hunting and a Christmas Tree for mule deer ... not necessarily the first choices though.
I'm pretty sure Trijicon itself was all Second Focal Plane for a LONG time before coming out with dedicated tactical / FFP stuff. And everyone knows and loves Trijicon. That AccuPoint 5-20x50mm I used to want so badly as a kid doesn't suck just because it has a SFP reticle. Just different.