I always see people mention they use the FCD when they crimp. Why do so many folks like that die? I can't see any advantages it has over other crimp dies. Is it price? In your opinion, what makes it superior for crimping?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Lee FCD on pistol rounds is a complete waste of money, it will make pistol rounds feed like butter at the expense of accuracy, this is because the bullet is resized as it passes thru the carbide sizing ring, twice, on rifle rounds the Lee FCD is the IMHO the greatest crimp die on the planet, the 4 sizing collets apply the perfect amount of crimp every time(trim length is critical) when adjusted properly and accuracy is not effected as far as I can tell.
I am NOT a "precision" shooter, IE match shooter, sniper etc. But I DO strive to wring decent accuracy out of my loads and POS guns.
Almost all my rifle rounds will probably be fired in a semi-auto. Mostly AR-types.
Although the majority seems to say that crimping is not needed, it makes me feel better with all that slam-banging around in a semi-auto.
All the disclaimers out of the way, I like the FCD because it is not NEARLY as particular about variations in case length. The roll-crimp built into most seating dies will easily collapse case shoulders if overdone to the slightest degree due to a longer case. The collapsed shoulder creates a bulge just below the shoulder that will cause the round to be hard to chamber or not chamber at all. The only other crimp die I would use on bottleneck cartridges would be a taper crimp of some kind. And I ALWAYS crimp in a separate operation from seating.
If all cases are trimmed consistently, why would the FCD apply a better crimp over, say, a Dillon crimp die? I don't see how it can be more precise or consistent of the die is locked down and all the cases are trimmed properly...