Re: why does a scope
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: okiefired</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Wow, I didnt think the OP was all that bad but everyone sure is jumping on the "trash his ass" wagon.
Anyway, Its pretty obvious why a Farrari cost more to build than a Pinto. From tires (which are at lest 10 times higher on the Far.) to the tech. in the brakeing system, drivetran, metalurgy and tighter tollerances in an engine thats built to make 600 hp and turn those extreem rpms to the high quality interiors, and fit and finish of everything. Ever really looked at the paint on a Farrari or Lambo? The difference isnt quite as obvious on scopes. Like I said before, not trying to be a smart ass but I'd really like to see some "facts" on why and how a NF is 5 times more expencive to produce than what he's talking about. And please, somthing besides "its clearer".
okie </div></div>
With all due respect......Call NF and ask them.....I dont think ANYONE on this forum is a NF build expert. not trying to get out of my cage but i can see why NF is higher than Tasco...etc. etc. tracking clarity. options ZERO....RETURN TO ZERO. EVERY SINGLE TASCO I have ever owned whether it be for an air rifle or 223 doesnt EVER hold a zero and track like its "supposed" to and return to the original zero and key-hole a shot. I have owned a NF and the differences are obvious to me without having to give and "explanation"
Bryan
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: okiefired</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Wow, I didnt think the OP was all that bad but everyone sure is jumping on the "trash his ass" wagon.
Anyway, Its pretty obvious why a Farrari cost more to build than a Pinto. From tires (which are at lest 10 times higher on the Far.) to the tech. in the brakeing system, drivetran, metalurgy and tighter tollerances in an engine thats built to make 600 hp and turn those extreem rpms to the high quality interiors, and fit and finish of everything. Ever really looked at the paint on a Farrari or Lambo? The difference isnt quite as obvious on scopes. Like I said before, not trying to be a smart ass but I'd really like to see some "facts" on why and how a NF is 5 times more expencive to produce than what he's talking about. And please, somthing besides "its clearer".
okie </div></div>
With all due respect......Call NF and ask them.....I dont think ANYONE on this forum is a NF build expert. not trying to get out of my cage but i can see why NF is higher than Tasco...etc. etc. tracking clarity. options ZERO....RETURN TO ZERO. EVERY SINGLE TASCO I have ever owned whether it be for an air rifle or 223 doesnt EVER hold a zero and track like its "supposed" to and return to the original zero and key-hole a shot. I have owned a NF and the differences are obvious to me without having to give and "explanation"
Bryan