I was playing with Robert Meijer's excellent "BfX" Excel ballistics calculator and compared Hodgdon's published max safe loads from a 24" .308" bbl using 168gr (muzzle velocity 2828fps) and 200gr (muzzle velocity 2582fps) BTHP bullets. The 200gr dominates in every measure I think a shooter would care about down the range past 1000 yards:
<ul style="list-style-type: disc">[*]More retained energy[*]Less wind deflection[*]Less spin drift[/list]
In the mid-range the 200gr trajectory does drop by 1 MOA more than the 168gr, but by 900 yards it has caught back up and is flatter through 1000 yards.
I suppose for shooting under 500 yards the only significant factor is retained energy, and maybe that's not worth the marginal cost of heavier bullets. But for anyone who loads .308 with the intention of long-range shooting why isn't 200gr or 220gr the standard instead of 168gr or 175gr?
<ul style="list-style-type: disc">[*]More retained energy[*]Less wind deflection[*]Less spin drift[/list]
In the mid-range the 200gr trajectory does drop by 1 MOA more than the 168gr, but by 900 yards it has caught back up and is flatter through 1000 yards.
I suppose for shooting under 500 yards the only significant factor is retained energy, and maybe that's not worth the marginal cost of heavier bullets. But for anyone who loads .308 with the intention of long-range shooting why isn't 200gr or 220gr the standard instead of 168gr or 175gr?