Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestNow I’m no NASA engineer, but I have done high power amateur rocketry. It wouldn’t take much research to figure out his rockets were doomed from the start. Cruising his web pages, he is, errr was monumentally dumb! He just barely survived his first rocketry stunt which only propelled him to 1100ft agl and crashed. So what did he do.. built a new rocket, no flight tests, no redundancy systems, and launched himself to 5k.
He literally just Evil Knieveled it.
From watching the video, even if his chute didn’t rip off at the start, it would of failed on descent. No deployment bag system to control lines and prevent shock loading the system. No chute reefing to control opening of the chute at speed. Also the chute shredded, so he also didn’t use a ballistic nylon chute. I could keep going, but I think the point is made.
His attempt to be a non NASA person to photograph the earth from space has already been done. Sorry flat earthrs, your bullshit has long been busted. https://www.ddeville.com/derek/CSXT.htm
I take it that’s not paper and balsa.Now I’m no NASA engineer, but I have done high power amateur rocketry. It wouldn’t take much research to figure out his rockets were doomed from the start. Cruising his web pages, he is, errr was monumentally dumb! He just barely survived his first rocketry stunt which only propelled him to 1100ft agl and crashed. So what did he do.. built a new rocket, no flight tests, no redundancy systems, and launched himself to 5k.
He literally just Evil Knieveled it.
From watching the video, even if his chute didn’t rip off at the start, it would of failed on descent. No deployment bag system to control lines and prevent shock loading the system. No chute reefing to control opening of the chute at speed. Also the chute shredded, so he also didn’t use a ballistic nylon chute. I could keep going, but I think the point is made.
His attempt to be a non NASA person to photograph the earth from space has already been done. Sorry flat earthrs, your bullshit has long been busted. https://www.ddeville.com/derek/CSXT.htm
Could be, in composite form. LOL. I was certified for level 2 high power and could do experimental level 3 launches.I take it that’s not paper and balsa.
But didn't he try three times and survive the first 2?
So Darwin's "1" would be in large bold font and Mike's "2" would have a tiny asterisk.
I believe that in this particular contest, it's not who wins most often, but who gets the last word.
Here’s some of the larger commercial rocket engines I got to mess with. Fun stuff, but expensive!! I used the exact same composite solid rocket propellant that the space shuttle uses. APCP or ammonium perchlorate composite propellant. http://www.pro38.com/products/pro98/motor.php
My personal rockets were in the 54mm diameter motor size and under. Much cheaper to fly on a regular basis. I averaged 10k agl or less at my club launches. Could go 20k, but our FFA altitude waiver lint was 12k.
Depending on organizations rules, most class 1 and 2 airframes have to be mostly non metallic. FAA and mil start asking lots of questions once you start launching metallic rocket airframes at Mach 2. So lots of composite structures, nomex honey comb, carbon fiber, phenolic resins, g10. All double redundancy full electronic telemetry control with live radio frequency tracking.
Could be, in composite form. LOL. I was certified for level 2 high power and could do experimental level 3 launches.
High Power Certification - Tripoli Rocketry Association
www.tripoli.org
As opposed to the standard 3-pt. landing, this is the lesser-known 1-pt. landing.
FIFYDudehad gutswas stupid enough to build and step into his own rocket, multiple times.