What's the consensus on the Browning M52's? I've got one (24" barrel, 91-92 production) that I'm just now starting to shoot (got my daughter a Bergara B14r and setting that up). Put a set of the warne scope mounts on it and mounted a Nikon EFR 3-9x rimfire scope on it to see what it'll do.
I assume it takes all the same accessories as the standard win52's (mags, etc)?
The last Browning 52C sporting rifle I bought was an online purchase, listed as "As NIB", and when it arrived, and I had time to look it over, I was very pleased with its appearance. But after I'd mounted a scope, and was going to wipe out the bore before taking it out to zero the scope, I found that the bore was heavily leaded, from breech to muzzle. It took a couple of hours of work with a fresh bronze brush to clean the leading out so I could get a good look at the bore with a Hawkeye borescope. What I found was a steeply angled & somewhat rough leade, and several annular rings irregularly spaced throughout the bore. But I took it out to the range anyway, and put 65rds of a good lot of SK Std+ through it (without getting a single respectable group @50yds). And when I got it back to the shop to wipe the bore out, I found that it was leaded-up again, about as bad as it had been before. Screw it, I thought - time to call Krieger and see if they might have a straight cylinder 22RF blank that they could profile similarly to the factory bbl. Got an affirmative answer, so sent the offending "As NIB" bbl off to them, with the request that they use it as a pattern for the replacement bbl, with the exception that they leave the new bbl blank .050" larger in diameter, from breech to muzzle, and leave at least an inch to be parted-off at both muzzle & breech.
It arrived just as I'd asked, and after I'd dialed it in and cut the tenon & chambered it with an EPS reamer, cut the extractor slots, and took it out to shoot, I was pretty pleased with the bbl, but still disgusted with the trigger, which not only had a heavy break, but also subjected my trigger finger to some of the grittiest & worst creep I'd ever experienced. Beats me why they'd go to the trouble to very nearly duplicating the original micro-motion trigger, only to do a really crappy job of finishing the internal parts and wind up with such an awful break. I drove the 'lawyer pin' out of the spring adjustment screw and backed it way off, but all the creep was still there, so I sent it off to Dokey from over on RFC. He got the weight of the break way down, but most of the creep was still there, albeit with nearly all the gritty feel smoothed out. So, long story short - I now have an attractive 52C sporting clone that shoots really well, and has a decent trigger. I don't have any experience with the Winchester-marked 52 sporting rifle, which comes with what is basically the same bbl'd action as the Browning clone, but in a stock that's copied from the 52B sporting rifle, with a cheekpiece, without the monte carlo that the Browning copy of the 52C has.
I'm hoping to find a nice, original 52C sporting rifle in good condition that I can afford after selling off a few other nice rifles - as crazy as prices have been getting, I may have to sell several more rifles to be able to swing the purchase...assuming I find a C model that really appeals to me.