Re: Without comment...
As the father of a Daughter and the Grandfather of two girls, I have long reserved comment on feminist agendas. I want to see my offspring prosper, but I have also experienced firsthand the consequences of aggressive feminist agendas. For some unclear reason (to me, anyway), I have always seemed to attract their lightning with greater than average intensity. I do my job as best I can and treat folks as decently as I can, but my axe always falls soon after a woman takes over.
It's extremely difficult to plot a course for myself that doesn't run afoul of both extremes in this area. In truth, my race is run, and it's my descendants whose roles are in play.
This article, however, puts the issue in a light that addresses it from a perspective I finally think I can understand.
I think the article's tagline addresses the key question.
So why do I post this topic here? I have long wondered what role feminist agendas play in the assault on gun ownership. I see a definite gender bias, and a clear polarization on the subject along gender lines. Disarmament might be viewed as a form of emasculation. I wonder how politicians play gun control as a ploy to amass feminist votes. I wonder how feminists in office use gun control as a badge of authority in counterpoint to male dominance, real or perceived (Damn right, Sisters; take their guns away and how much weight do they wield now?).
Ponder you that...
Greg