Sidearms & Scatterguns Worth the risk?

[VTgunner]

So I've read a lot about Sig's quality control problems as of late. I really want a P226 but is it worth the risk? I don't want to spend around $900 for a pistol that may or may not function correctly. I guess I would like to know if it's a hyped up problem or whether it's a serious concern.

Thanks

 

[shooter2360]

Re: Worth the risk?

I had a sig P226 and older one, I had no problem with the function. The accuracy was not great.

 

[SledDog]

Re: Worth the risk?

You might consider a Sig CPO. Some dealers get these and they're a great deal. Essentially police depts get new gear and treade in their Sigs. The guns go back to Sig for a checkup and replacement of worn parts. I got my p229 this way and it's a great one.

 

[VTgunner]

Re: Worth the risk?

Well I'm going to be buying a brand new one not a used one.

 

[DP425]

Re: Worth the risk?

I have one from 2001 and one from 2010 (both 229's). I can tell you this much- the one from 01 is superb quality with outstanding machining and great fit. No where does it feel as though a corner was cut. The 2010 however shows a decrease in quality of workmanship and some skimping on part quality.

While I can say the 01 is HIGHLY reliable, with better than 4000rds down the tube, I only have about 500 through the 10'. Despite no failures I feel this is too small of a round count to really get a grasp on reliability.

Over-all it would seem they match up just fine function wise but you can see and feel a difference in refinement.

 

[feel_da_fury]

Re: Worth the risk?

I bought a sig 226 back in 09. Over 2k round later, it still function perfectly.

 

[In2b8u]

Re: Worth the risk?

Nothing wrong with Sig. New or CPO. I would not hesitate to purchase a Sig weapon.

 

[ubet]

Re: Worth the risk?

I have a sig 220carry, bought it in 08, 10k rounds through it, and only had problems with it during break in <500rds (as long as I remember to crimp ALL of my rounds). Accuracy is great in it, fit and finish are fine. I have no problems and would highly recommend one.

 

[VTgunner]

Re: Worth the risk?

Thanks guys.

I put out quote requests to a bunch of the shops around here for the Enhanced Elite model, so I'll see what I get back

 

[twadsw01]

Re: Worth the risk?

VT, I bought a Sig P226 in .40 about a year ago and have put about 3k rounds through it so far. It's functioned flawlessly and has great double- and single-action pulls. I got an E-squared model with the updated grip and short-reset trigger.

I wouldn't have any qualms about purchasing another, but I'm only a sample size of one. It might be best to talk to a few gunsmiths/armorers and see what they have to say about Sigs as well.

 

[VTgunner]

Re: Worth the risk?

I went ahead and ordered the P226 Enhanced Elite 9mm model.

 

[Arbiter]

Re: Worth the risk?

The newer models will probably function just fine, but the fit and "feel" of the weapon just isn't quite the same. Statistical differences in reliability would be almost impossible to come by, but it should be noted that there's a certain anecdotal trend in LE circles within the last year or two away from Sig products due to QC and CS issues. One of the largest agencies in the state just de-listed Sigs as an approved carry option, leaving Glock as their de facto standard. Publicity issues over certain large federal agency contracts are widely visible online, including Sig's response to criticism.

Put bluntly, Sig management needs a shakeup, and the people in charge need to return back to their focus on making a superior product their highest priority...not just boosting their quarterly profitability.