Re: WTF with all the "this VS that" optics threads?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This is the problem.
Here is an honest question pointed to the post above. What do you expect to "see" that might be different between the 3 scopes and do you honestly believe it would be anything more than a single opinion. </div></div>
Of course it's always an opinion, but in your case, seeing as using different scopes and rifles is a big part of your job then your opinion is a valid one or at least one worth considering.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> You have to understand what you are talking about. The idea that if you bought anyone of those you would be disappointed. Your question is trying to ask others to satisfy you personal values in something that is clearly different than mine. </div></div>
Why would you say this? Rather, what I and the other guy are saying is that we seek some measure across the board by which to form our personal values on. I'm not trying to outsource my due diligence to you, I'm trying to find a framework in which to perform my due diligence with the disadvantage of not being able to handle, look through, mount and test the scopes myself. Of course it's not perfect, of course it places a weight of opinion of what you or other reviewers say, but hey, if I could do all that stuff myself I wouldn't need SH and I dare say fewer others would and you'd not have a site with sponsorship and a revenue stream that allows you to get equipment sent to you to test and play with to get first hand experience. Am I jealous? Heck yeah!
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body">If you can't decide based on the cannon of what has been posted, it's because you don't understand the product, the application or what you want. There are videos of the Hensoldt in action and at night. You can see it and hear the commentary.</div></div>
In my case, this is pretty true. I'm a noob to scopes. Hence why I came here to learn. Hence why comparative reviews are the best ones for me. When someone says 'wow, the clicks are precise and they show for example the target(s) used for tracking testing between scope A and Scope B then I can see that yes, scope A costing $900 tracks as well as scope B for $2500. But then, when you show the difference in the ability to get a full sight picture between the two and that scope B is much better in this regards I can determine the differences in the two and decide which one is better suited for me. However, if you only say, 'the site picture is so-so in terms of ease to attain and there is no comparison to another scope I don't, as a noob, have a term of reference to understand what that means in practicality.
Remember, I'm just saying fair comparative tests using standard metrics (whatever they may be, but they must be consistently used in every test) are very useful for education.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lowlight</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> is the root of the problem. People want Gucci but not to wear and only if it looks better than Dolce & Gabbana. </div></div>
I only wish this were true. My wife wants both. In copious quantities. Hence why I can't afford to buy PH, S&B AND Hensoldt and so need something to help me decide which is best for me.....
BTW - thanks for the site!