Did a bit of research on ammo I spotted on CTD...the XM 193...
Looking for a HD round for my AR. AS I understand it, the XM 193 was <span style="text-decoration: underline">declined </span>by NATO (and a long list of countries) , as a replacement for the 7.62 round, due to it's inhumane wound capabilities<span style="font-weight: bold"> *</span>. Isn't the whole point to stop the attack? From what I've read, the XM193 (55gr) is flying so fast that when it impacts a target it appears to fragment damn quick; dumping a large amount of it's energy early. Does that basically make it a Frangible round? Wouldn't a DRT type product do the same thing? DRT round is designed to dump energy upon contact with water/flesh. Am I just missing something? What the difference? Speed then frag vs frag less speed..??? *
<span style="font-weight: bold">Source:</span> Wikipedia,5.56 x 45 NATO (see key notes 9 & 10); and International Legall Initiatives to Restrict Military Small Arm Ammunition by W Hays Parks copyright 2010
Looking for a HD round for my AR. AS I understand it, the XM 193 was <span style="text-decoration: underline">declined </span>by NATO (and a long list of countries) , as a replacement for the 7.62 round, due to it's inhumane wound capabilities<span style="font-weight: bold"> *</span>. Isn't the whole point to stop the attack? From what I've read, the XM193 (55gr) is flying so fast that when it impacts a target it appears to fragment damn quick; dumping a large amount of it's energy early. Does that basically make it a Frangible round? Wouldn't a DRT type product do the same thing? DRT round is designed to dump energy upon contact with water/flesh. Am I just missing something? What the difference? Speed then frag vs frag less speed..??? *
<span style="font-weight: bold">Source:</span> Wikipedia,5.56 x 45 NATO (see key notes 9 & 10); and International Legall Initiatives to Restrict Military Small Arm Ammunition by W Hays Parks copyright 2010