I haven't shopped for a scope for myself in a long time. I have a couple GA Precision .308s set up for long range shooting outfitted with old Nightforce scopes. That's all I really know--.308s-- my .22LR expertise could fit in a thimble upside down.
A friend wants to get into .22LR "long range" shooting (up to 150 or even 200 yards). He has his eye on a Ruger 10/22 Takedown and a Vortex Optics Crossfire II 6-18×44 scope. He leans towards the Vortex Crossfire II because it got a good review here: https://scopesfield.com/best-scope-for-ruger-10-22#1 He likes the idea of a Ruger Takedown because he goes camping. This rifle would serve as his only .22LR rifle.
His budget is $1400 including ($575 for a) silencer and a Tandemkross trigger group. I'm tryin' to talk him out of the Takedown and silencer-- in favor of a 10/22 with better out-of-the-box accuracy. I'm quite severe in my criticism of his scope choice--but my bias for "better" clear and bright optics is showing I think. I also favor Volquartsen triggers but that's probably because I'm old and don't know what's available nowadays..
I'm not up on technological advances in the scope industry. He really likes the idea of FFP, but I dunno anything about these scopes. My scopes are all old, and SFP.. My advice to him was to at least get into the $800+ range for a better scope and stick with SFP for "short range" clarity, but on second thought that only seems valid if he gives up on the idea of the Ruger Takedown and chooses a Ruger 10/22 model that's inherently more accurate. My thinking is, putting an expensive scope on a Takedown is like putting a tuxedo on a pig.
What would your advice be for a Ruger 10/22 long range rig if you were limited to $1400 budget? Which Ruger 10/22 and what scope? Would you add a trigger group?
Thank you very much for your consideration and advice!
A friend wants to get into .22LR "long range" shooting (up to 150 or even 200 yards). He has his eye on a Ruger 10/22 Takedown and a Vortex Optics Crossfire II 6-18×44 scope. He leans towards the Vortex Crossfire II because it got a good review here: https://scopesfield.com/best-scope-for-ruger-10-22#1 He likes the idea of a Ruger Takedown because he goes camping. This rifle would serve as his only .22LR rifle.
His budget is $1400 including ($575 for a) silencer and a Tandemkross trigger group. I'm tryin' to talk him out of the Takedown and silencer-- in favor of a 10/22 with better out-of-the-box accuracy. I'm quite severe in my criticism of his scope choice--but my bias for "better" clear and bright optics is showing I think. I also favor Volquartsen triggers but that's probably because I'm old and don't know what's available nowadays..
I'm not up on technological advances in the scope industry. He really likes the idea of FFP, but I dunno anything about these scopes. My scopes are all old, and SFP.. My advice to him was to at least get into the $800+ range for a better scope and stick with SFP for "short range" clarity, but on second thought that only seems valid if he gives up on the idea of the Ruger Takedown and chooses a Ruger 10/22 model that's inherently more accurate. My thinking is, putting an expensive scope on a Takedown is like putting a tuxedo on a pig.
What would your advice be for a Ruger 10/22 long range rig if you were limited to $1400 budget? Which Ruger 10/22 and what scope? Would you add a trigger group?
Thank you very much for your consideration and advice!