• Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support
  • You Should Now Be Receiving Emails!

    The email issued mentioned earlier this week is now fixed! You may also have received previous emails that were meant to be sent over the last few days - apologies, this was a one time issue and shouldn't happen again!

Sidearms & Scatterguns Your Favorite Current Production .357 Magnum Revolver

For a range and Target gun- S&W 686 in 6"

Not to heavy with full length underbarrel lug
Not clunky - to me-Rugers are Clunkly
L frame- so solid and can handle a diet of 357

You can also load up very light 38 specials with 147 gr HBWC for newer shooters, great accuracy. very light recoil and muzzle blast.

Revolvers- Like most guns- don't wear out.

If considering used, watch some videos and bring a checklist to the seller to use when inspecting one for the common issues...

Like a bent crane or ejector rod from someone playing hollywood and swinging the cylinder shut
 
If i cant do it with 8 rds of 357 mag.....
 

Attachments

  • 20200229_141226.jpg
    20200229_141226.jpg
    402.9 KB · Views: 61
Last year I went for the SW 586-L. I basically missed my 2" Colt King Cobra I sold decades ago (sigh $500) and wanted a stout .357 again. The 586-L seemed to have a few extras that sold me. Compensator, 7 shot capacity, trigger job, tritium front site and ability to reload with moon clips. Moon clips looked like a quicker reload option but to me seem like more of a PIA vs speed loader.

A few quirks to be mindful of on this model;
  • Front site tritium insert sounds cool but is very small. Its visible in only real dark conditions.
  • Sights are black on black. I wound up painting the front blade neon orange.(replacement cost)
  • Moon clips bend and are perishable. S&W replacements are not so cheap for what they are. Off brand clips are hit/miss.
  • I read after the fact it shoots tighter groups with moon clips. I have not tested it but sounds plausable.
  • It comes with 2 grips. CCW size wood and full size rubber. I preferred the wood look but its not to functional. The material on the side of the grip gets in the way of ejecting and loading. I eliminated some material (a little to much) from the side and its ugly but improved. The smaller CCW style grips you would need to feel for yourself but I also wound up sanding down the finger groove hump. (replacement cost)
  • I bought mine used and had problems with it misfiring. Weak strikes with various ammo brands. After confirming the mainspring was not loosened, S&W support sent a call tag . Fix it ticket stated; new yoke needed, end shake adjustment.
 
Last edited:
The easy part of the answer for me is GP100. The difficulty comes in deciding which variant. My default gun is a 4 inch stainless 686 or GP100, so I guess the honest answer is a 4 inch stainless GP100. I greatly prefer shorter barrels, and GP100s have been more durable for me than 686s. A GP can also be tuned to greatness about as easily as a Smith, the only downer is I feel the length of the DA trigger pull on a GP should be just a smidge shorter.
 
OP I was looking at LNIB python's at the time and was already figuring on being in the Korth price range and opted for the Korth because I felt like I would shoot it more and have the ability to get it fixed if something went wrong. Nighthawk recommended the 3 inch over the 4 so that is what I purchased. I do have a pre lock 586 that is 4 inch in my collection that is a nice pistol but it is not a Korth.
 
I have two 686+, I also have a Taurus 66 and a 608.
Of course, I also have a Model 24, a 657, a 64, a 36 and a 625.
I'm very fond of the 686, whether it is the 6 or 7 shot. well balanced, easy to do trigger work on, accurate and good looking as well.
My Taurus revolvers have been solid performer's.
The S&W's are a bit more refined.
I have always liked the GP100, though I have never owned one.