Re: Your ideas for a SWAT team sniper scope?
Not specifically directed at the OP, but for general consideration related to the topic:
FFP vs SFP
Reticle Calibration – you can use any reticle at any power as long you understand how it works and you can do some math. I.E. your SFP scope is setup to range at 20x, but you are on 10x and you want to use the reticle to range or hold. Formula: Desired Power / Factory Set Power = Mod Factor, Reticle Reading / Mod Factor = Actual Reticle Reading. So 10x / 20x = 0.5, take whatever reticle read you have and divide it by 0.5 . If you do these math conversions ahead of time, and carry that data with you (in your head or on paper), you can refer to it and quickly employ a SFP scope on numerous magnification settings. I would agree a FFP can be quicker/easier to use, but I don’t like the argument that a SFP is only functional for ranging and holds on a single factory set magnification point. IMHO, too many shooters do not truly know or exploit the full capabilities of what they have access to.
Reticle Recognition – per comments above, the reticle on some FFPs will basically become a crosshair at lower power settings, you will lose the ability to resolve the finer details of the reticle. This means you will lack the detail you need to use it for ranging or holds at the lower power settings. If you are going to look at a FFP then IMHO this is something that you really need to look at and evaluate.
RANGE & WEAPON SYSTEM CHOICE
I always hear about “close range sniper engagements”, sorry but IMHO if you are engaging a target at 15-30 yards then it is not a “sniper engagement” and you don’t need a bolt gun with a magnified optic. At those close ranges a good marksman should be able to make T Zone shots with a quality patrol rifle (& ammo) using Iron Sights or a Red Dot, and you would probably be better off doing so. I can appreciate deploying LE personnel do not have a "caddy" to follow them around carrying a broad selection of weapon systems to choose from. That being the case, hopefully LE personnel will look at the specific details of a given situation and have the option when they deploy to take the weapon system that works best for that given situation. I see more rifles being put in service that are setup to be a “jack of all trades”, BUIS, Red Dot on a Offset Mount, and a Mid-High Power Scope. In many instances this will give the shooter a lot of options to use in whatever situation they may face. But likewise, the old saying “jack of all, master of none” can come into play. Going back to a “Golf Analogy”, you wouldn’t try to make a tee shot with a putter, likewise you shouldn’t try to make a 15 yard shot with a scoped rifle on 20x.
SHOOTER / SPOTTER & SITUATIONAL AWARENESS
Biggest transition I have had to make going from Military to LE Sniping is Military using a shooter on rifle and a spotter on scope, to LE using both personnel on rifle and both acting as shooters. Putting both on a rifle as shooters can change the dynamics where they both are focusing closely on a precise shot, versus one being focused closely in on the shot, and the other being focused out on the overall big picture. I can understand the desire by LE to get 2 simultaneous shots on the target to increase the probability of success, but I think the change / loss of the role of a dedicated observer can be detrimental. With LE you can also see more of a tendency to deploy a single individual to fulfill the sniper role due to staffing issues. This also obviously hinders the ability to maintain a broader overall situational awareness. This can also tie back into gear and rifle setup where the scope on the rifle becomes the only means of target observation and the use of additional optics (spotting scope or binoculars) can be lost. I always try to stress the importance of having a dedicated spotter, and if need be the possibility of using non sniper personnel to cover this role. With a little bit of training and practice, a patrol officer acting as a dedicated observer is better IMHO than having no one acting as an observer.
Sorry for the long winded dissertation, but I think those can all be important issues when it comes to operations and equipment selection. I don’t actually play golf, but I can’t get away from the analogies, a golfer’s shot is dictated by; the situation he is in, the equipment he has access to, and his capabilities. Likewise for success, a shooter has to take into account: situation, equipment, and capability, and come up with the correct combination for success. A golfer who shows up at a PAR 5 PGA course, with one golf club, and no practice, might as well not show up! A LE Sniper who shows up at a 25 yard engagement, with a fixed 10 power scope, he has only shot at 100 yards, is a recipe for disaster!
Scope selection obviously should be a well thought out process, which per above has a lot of variables / factors that come into play. IMHO, there is not always one simple, short, quick answer, but you have to take everything into account.
Best of Luck,
M Richardson