ZCO 420 vs NF 420 on a gas gun.

Can't decide between the two. I run mostly ZCO but need a new gas gun optic.

Is the ZCO really worth 1.5x the cost?

Would be a MPCT1x or a Mil-c
Been very happy with my ZCO 4-20 mpct1x…. It’s not on a gas gun tho…

I have a nx8 2.5-20 but not a 4-20 so no real experience there. The 2.5-20 has been great as well, not sure the ZCO is worth the money over it for a gas rig. JMO tho
 
Everyone loves their zco 420

It is one of @Lowlight favorites according to a podcast interview he did a few years back. Even put it on one of his AI rifles on the cover of his book: https://a.co/d/emDox9D

lowlight zc420.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG and simonp
NF 4x16 seems to be the NF glass for a gas gun from the posts on here, not sure if Id spend the dough on a ZCO for a gas gun but all depends on how rich or poor you are I guess LOL
 
What don’t u like about the Mk4?
On a gas gun it's just not forgiving eyebox wise with my current setup. I like them on bolt/hunting guns where you can setup the gun without LOP and cheek restrictions. I took it out to play with at a PRS match last weekend and just didn't dig it for what I'm trying to do.
 
I like my NF 4-20. Its true, it tunnels at around 4x-7x but it don’t bother me much since I would never use the optic at that magnification. The ZCO 420 IMO is the best ZCO offers and it’s very impressive but, if you don’t want to drop that kind of coin the NF is a good option.
 
  • Love
Reactions: CSTactical
I haven’t owned the 4-20 ZCO. I have the 527. But have owned the 4-16 and 4-20 atacr. The 4-20 is a 5.5-20 with tunneling. Between the two I’ll be buying the 4-16 again when I upgrade my LMT MWS. The low profile locking turret and overall compact design is what stands out to me. It’s the perfect gas gun optic in my opinion if the 16 on the top end is enough magnification

If I have the $$ laying around at the time I’ll get the ZCO instead. But the NF can be purchased for about $1000 less in the px
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonp and BurtG
Am I really going to be that a-hole? Buy my stuff - S&B Ultra Short 3-20 in the PX. I wouldn't be that guy but another dude selling his k540i and I want it for a long throat 300 RUM that needs an upgrade.
 
Had 4-32F1 on my gas gun, now running the 420. So far the 420 seems better from the little bit of used I’ve had with it.

Call me crazy, but the NF lineup seems to have suffered some glass issues lately. The 2.5-10 on my 7-08 seems ok still
 
We shall see. I might pull the trigger on a 4-16x42 NF and if for some reason I hate it, Can always sell it and grab another ZCO. I already have a 8-40 on order and could move a 5-27 to the gas gun in the short term if needed.


If you had the 8-40 on order with me, you would probably have it faster. - Richard
 
What do you mean? New production? ATACR? etc
Sorry, from my perspective. When I started playing with NF(mostly NXS and NX8) and it was quite a bit nicer than I was used to, I guess I put the brand on a pedestal. As I got more involved with stuff and looked through more, I saw there were others that outdid NF, some even cheaper by a good bit. I have played very little with the ATACR line so not a lot of input.


I see the difference in the higher end scopes so there is no real comparison in my 420 and a NXS/8 series.

I think for the money you pay for NF, they are probably quite a few brands that perform as well and maybe cost less. Seems like they would have picked up on this over the years and tried to keep pace. The low light gathering on most of the NXS/8 series is not that great IMO.

Probably all sounds like rubbish and babble, but that’s just my fault cause I can’t talk right
 
Sorry, from my perspective. When I started playing with NF(mostly NXS and NX8) and it was quite a bit nicer than I was used to, I guess I put the brand on a pedestal. As I got more involved with stuff and looked through more, I saw there were others that outdid NF, some even cheaper by a good bit. I have played very little with the ATACR line so not a lot of input.


I see the difference in the higher end scopes so there is no real comparison in my 420 and a NXS/8 series.

I think for the money you pay for NF, they are probably quite a few brands that perform as well and maybe cost less. Seems like they would have picked up on this over the years and tried to keep pace. The low light gathering on most of the NXS/8 series is not that great IMO.

Probably all sounds like rubbish and babble, but that’s just my fault cause I can’t talk right
If you’re comparing scopes like ZCO you need to be comparing them to the atacr line. It’s a different animal vs NX8 and for sure NXS. The NXS glass I had compared fairly well with my Sightron SIII glass 15 years ago.

I’ve looked through the NX8 and didn’t think it was all that great compared to others. Keep in mind the NX8/NXS line are 30 mm tubes. Atacr are 34mm and ZCO is 36mm I believe which will effect light gathering

My favorite of the atacr line are the 4-16 and 7-35. ZCO is going to be better than the NF optically. Even if only by a bit in some comparisons. My 4-20 atacr I wasn’t blow away by. I haven’t looked through a 5-25 atacr because of their past rep of being the worse glass in the atacr series. Newer models may be better

If we’re comparing NF atacr to cheaper glass (glass only) I say my Athlon Cronus was about right on par in good lighting. Never tested the two in low light. But even my DNT looks surprisingly good in good lighting

NF has built their history of reliability with the NXS which carried on to the atacr line. The SHV/NX8 were just some cheaper options added within their flagship products
 
If you’re comparing scopes like ZCO you need to be comparing them to the atacr line. It’s a different animal vs NX8 and for sure NXS. The NXS glass I had compared fairly well with my Sightron SIII glass 15 years ago.

I’ve looked through the NX8 and didn’t think it was all that great compared to others. Keep in mind the NX8/NXS line are 30 mm tubes. Atacr are 34mm and ZCO is 36mm I believe which will effect light gathering

My favorite of the atacr line are the 4-16 and 7-35. ZCO is going to be better than the NF optically. Even if only by a bit in some comparisons. My 4-20 atacr I wasn’t blow away by. I haven’t looked through a 5-25 atacr because of their past rep of being the worse glass in the atacr series. Newer models may be better

If we’re comparing NF atacr to cheaper glass (glass only) I say my Athlon Cronus was about right on par in good lighting. Never tested the two in low light. But even my DNT looks surprisingly good in good lighting

NF has built their history of reliability with the NXS which carried on to the atacr line. The SHV/NX8 were just some cheaper options added within their flagship products
That’s why I said this
I see the difference in the higher end scopes so there is no real comparison in my 420 and a NXS/8 series.
 
To be honest I've never owned a zco. I own/owned a bunch of everything else including NF.

The ATACR 4-16x42 is a great smaller scope. Have one on my sp10 and on a 300wsm hunting rifle. Seems to have a very forgiving eyebox. I can shoot it along with my wife and 2 young boys (8yo and 12yo) without making any adjustments in lop
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jadazu and simonp
To be honest I've never owned a zco. I own/owned a bunch of everything else including NF.

The ATACR 4-16x42 is a great smaller scope. Have one on my sp10 and on a 300wsm hunting rifle. Seems to have a very forgiving eyebox. I can shoot it along with my wife and 2 young boys (8yo and 12yo) without making any adjustments in lop
👍 Thanks. I may need to try one of these on my smaller Tac Ops Delta.
 
No reason to be hesitant, there are tons of great 36mm options and many high end scopes are moving to 36mm.
My only experience with 36mm mounts are area419 and I must say, they are outstanding. Beautiful craftsmanship!!! My current setup is a zero MOA with the high top rail but I recently picked up a 20MOA and low rail. Hopefully everything clears and still have a good visual on the LRF display.