Have heard from a feller on here that the ZCO ocular might not work with the TriggerCam 2.1.
If you have tried it, please comment here on your findings.
If you have tried it, please comment here on your findings.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have both. Like @SD Carpenter said, without any shims you can mount it on there, but you're metal on metal and you have to mount it a little further back than ideal due to the location of the magnification ring. Finding that I have a limited number of scopes that work with the triggercam.Can anyone else comment on this? Does it work or not? Im in the market for both.
Did you ever get this to work boss?I’m going to wrap some electric tape on the ocular and see if that will work. Not down for metal on metal.
It will. I’ve got videos on my IG with it. As long as you don’t mind the metal on metal contact.Man Preston you might have just saved me $600. I was on the cusp of buying a TC but I absolutely need it to work on ZCO.![]()
Infact I got it from Preston. Just trying to get my $$ back as I don’t really use it
Pm sent with a few questionsIt will. I’ve got videos on my IG with it. As long as you don’t mind the metal on metal contact.
The triggercam works of you don't mind a little scuf marks on the eyepiece.a little over a year later and I’m wondering if anyone has found a workaround or other system that works well with the ZCO.
I used painter’s tape on the ocular housing to prevent that. Works well enough.The triggercam works of you don't mind a little scuf marks on the eyepiece.
It works currently. Not sure what adapter you’d need.Any updates? You'd think TC can make an adapter or something.
With minor cropping of the video in post you’ll never know the difference. Most scopes vignette a small little bit with a TC anyway so cropping the edges is never a bad thing.Well, it kinda works. It doesn’t actually fit properly, but it can be made to function. Expect tunneling of the FOV and the image, as the TC sits farther back on the ZCO than intended. Your eye relief is unchanged.
You're not wrong, but I offered the info lest anyone have expectations that will exceed reality. And some might not find the constraints acceptable at the price.With minor cropping of the video in post you’ll never know the difference. Most scopes vignette a small little bit with a TC anyway so cropping the edges is never a bad thing.
All true and fair points. I merely meant they won’t know the difference from a video perspective when reviewing the footage. My ZCO footage looks better than my Tangent footage. Actually my ZCO probably looks the best of any scope I’ve used the TC on which is a lot of scopes.You're not wrong, but I offered the info lest anyone have expectations that will exceed reality. And some might not find the constraints acceptable at the price.
I also didn't list every downside, but here are the ones I've experienced:
- The M3-0.5 x 10mm clamping screw it ships with is barely long enough to clamp onto a ZCO, like only two threads of engagement; replacing it with an M3-0.5 x 14mm screw was much more reliable
- The downrange housing of the TC obstructs the zoom throw lever, so you either have to run at lower magnification (I compete at 20x and train at 27x) or rotate the TC then fix the video angle in post-processing
- The scope ocular housing doesn't fit all the way into the TC, as I mentioned above; not only does this increase tunneling of the shooter's FOV as well as the video, it also means the TC is more liable to be misaligned because the rigid portion of the mounting sleeve (the part that doesn't clamp to the scope) isn't aligning the device
- The device is also closer to the shooter's face than designed, which could make scope bite more likely on a heavy-recoiling, lightweight rifle; shooter needs to be cognizant of this risk
- As mentioned above, no plastic collar means you're metal-on-metal on your $4k scope unless you put something in there to protect the contact surfaces
Those are the ones that come to mind, I might've forgotten one or two. It can absolutely work, it does work, and I've used it and will continue to do so. But it's a bit specious to imply that a user won't know the difference when mating a TC up with a ZCO, especially if they've used it on a scope with a smaller ocular housing. You'll know the difference, because you have to futz with it to make it work, and your final product (the video) is diminished in quality; the extent of that diminishment is in the eye of the beholder. My preference is to let someone know what they're getting into, then let them make a more educated decision.