JR1200W3 said:

Some of my buddies struggle with the concept of putting a muzzle brake on the end of a suppressor. And I understand their thought process. You either want it quiet or you want to reduce recoil. But I also understand people's desire for reduced concussion I had a slight cost to recoil reduction. Which means that you're not trying to reduce noise with the suppressor, you're just trying to reduce the concussion.

I don't support the no suppressor is hearing safe group of people. I understand what they're saying and I don't argue the technical aspect of DB threshold for hearing safe. But I just try not to be a homo and wear a bunch of ear pro all over the place. I consider my ultra 9 and dominus to be hearing safe enough for me to shoot them without ear pro. But if you put a loudener on any one of those suppressors they definitely are not quite enough to shoot without ear protection. Another group of buddies I have, have all bought into the Magnus RR's and to be honest I don't think those are quiet enough to be shot without peer protection. So once you break the threshold of having to wear ear protection, why mince about with sacrificing recoil reduction for a slight advantage in suppression that you can't enjoy because you have to wear hearing protection anyway. I guess that would be my thought process on pairing the least efficient suppressor possible with this brake. The suppressor is purely there to reduce concussion. No part of it is to be shot without hearing protection.

But you are right. I do want a Maverick. I was looking at them last weekend and they're all out of stock. I don't have a suppressor that the recoil X brake can slave on to. So I would have to go out and buy a suppressor just to use the brake and at that point I thought I might as well just buy the Maverick.

Click to expand...

Eric Stecker EG said:

For others reading this thread, the situation Turbwhistle is facing is something we hear a lot. To address these questions, we've established a new test and evaluation program.

https://defiancemachine.com/test-and-evaluation-program/

Through this program, we can send a Ruckus or anTi-X with a 75 degree or 90 degree bolt for you to test. There is a fully refundable $100 deposit. If you want the action we can put it towards the purchase. If you don't like it, you can send it back with prepaid label that comes in the box and you get your $100 back.

We came up with this program for exactly this type of situation. It comes up a lot. If you are interested in the T&E program, click on the link above or call the shop and ask them about it.

-Eric

Click to expand...

Mwalex said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

glider said:

PM inbound

Click to expand...

JR1200W3 said:

Some of my buddies struggle with the concept of putting a muzzle brake on the end of a suppressor. And I understand their thought process. You either want it quiet or you want to reduce recoil. But I also understand people's desire for reduced concussion I had a slight cost to recoil reduction. Which means that you're not trying to reduce noise with the suppressor, you're just trying to reduce the concussion.

I don't support the no suppressor is hearing safe group of people. I understand what they're saying and I don't argue the technical aspect of DB threshold for hearing safe. But I just try not to be a homo and wear a bunch of ear pro all over the place. I consider my ultra 9 and dominus to be hearing safe enough for me to shoot them without ear pro. But if you put a loudener on any one of those suppressors they definitely are not quite enough to shoot without ear protection. Another group of buddies I have, have all bought into the Magnus RR's and to be honest I don't think those are quiet enough to be shot without peer protection. So once you break the threshold of having to wear ear protection, why mince about with sacrificing recoil reduction for a slight advantage in suppression that you can't enjoy because you have to wear hearing protection anyway. I guess that would be my thought process on pairing the least efficient suppressor possible with this brake. The suppressor is purely there to reduce concussion. No part of it is to be shot without hearing protection.

But you are right. I do want a Maverick. I was looking at them last weekend and they're all out of stock. I don't have a suppressor that the recoil X brake can slave on to. So I would have to go out and buy a suppressor just to use the brake and at that point I thought I might as well just buy the Maverick.

Click to expand...

DAVID A BUREAU said:

Is the Canadian guns available to US ?

Click to expand...

theLBC said:

i disagree. when there is a limit to the number of "journalists" in the room, the selection process does appear to offer legitimacy to those allowed in.
we can disagree on this, but that is my opinion..

Click to expand...