8208xbr thoughts
- By Doom
- Reloading Depot
- 21 Replies
You ask an interesting question. I can tell you that 8208 works well in 223 and 308. I've used it in both and it is my go to powder in 223 with a 52/53 gr bullet in my 223 varmint rifle. I don't currently use it in 308 with the 168SMK but I have produced good loads with it. Is it better than the powders you have on hand? That is very hard to say and it obviously depends on what you are looking for. In 2012 when I was looking to a replacement for H335 that was more temperature stable I tried it, liked the results and have found no reason to change.Looking for advice on 8208 xbr from veterans who load with it. Loading only for gas guns 2 of which i am pushing for accuracy 223 and 308. I read many people having success with it. Loading 69gr and 77gr in 223. 168gr and 175gr in 308. Have TAC for 223 and TAC, IMR 4895 and Ar comp as well. Would I be stupid not to try 8208 xbr. I read its very versatile across both calibers. It is a clean or dirty burning powder.
You have powders that are considered more than adequate for your application and I would personally not pursue another powder unless I wasn't happy with the results from those or I need to to change due to availability issues or pricing. It is very hard to pick specific winners when it comes to what powder is best in any specific cartridge. In reality most reloaders probably reject powders based on low sample size tests when more testing would produce different results.
There are powders that excel in some cartridges that has been proven over time. Varget in 308, IMR 4064 in 308, and there are others. We know these powders based on competition. F-T/R, Palma, F-Class, and other competitive environments tend to migrate to the most reliable powders and do based on thousands of rounds fired. But if you dig into it the Hodgdon/ADI powders (of which 8208 is one) seem to be ones that rule. Some of the newer Alliant RL series and Vihtavouri tend to follow.