I thought Dersh was Epstein's lawyer? and Harvey Weinstein's? and TRUMP's?

Who the heck is this guy?

The Dersh already told us that there was nothing untoward and that it was all on the up-and-up.

He even kept his underpants on THE WHOLE TIME!

Bumpity bump

Well, this is an important wrinkle in my situation and maybe I should cancel my Magnus RR and my 338 GEN 2RR

I surely don’t want to be holding a $2000 piece of titanium that is outdated six months after I receive it because the big beautiful bill passed and removed silencers from the purview of NFA and now we can mix and match parts as we please

I’ll take this

Price drop

If you are looking to learn something look into Max point blank range, it’s very useful for hunting. It puts you in the kill zone out to a certain range based on the ballistics of your bullet.

TheOE800 said:

people malign the Specter, but any LPVO I’ve ever used especially say the ATACR is like looking through a goddamn straw in comparison. On 1x I can see the switches on my handguard lol.

Click to expand...

I ran an OS4x for quite some time and I'd have to agree, the image/glass/reticle was phenomenal. And to be fair, the NF lpvos (even the ATACR) while quality optics comparatively lack the optical forgiveness of some of their LPVO peers, but the point is still valid.

That said, the issues most have with the Elcans are either with the shitty ARMs clamping hardware and their all too often feeble clamping on rails. Or the distrust of the prisim switching mechanism and potential zero shift.

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

ext on legs spring loaded ie when release is pushed legs extend or retract?

LuckyDuck said:

I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that I noticed that their profile indicates they have their 44th birthday coming up in just over 2 weeks so wanted to throw in a quick plug out to @kalashnikev and wish them a sincere and happy (upcoming) birthday if that's in fact accurate.

Click to expand...

Thank you!

All I want for my birthday this year is a good value for RUS_KIA.



Let's bring back those FOUR DIGIT DAYS!!!

PappyM3 said:

It’s not exact, because sometimes the angular field of view isn’t linear across the magnification range. But close enough for rough comparisons, you just multiply the FOV by the magnfication amount. So 39 * 1.5 = 58.5 feet at 100 yards. Which is indeed bad.

Click to expand...

Thank you!

-Stan

Spritz him with a water bottle….