Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Point still stands. You don't need the .02 of a grain accuracy. I very much doubt anyone could shoot the difference if they were given loads blind. There are just too many variables to worry about that fine of a resolution in charges.
Nice, does the horse shoe provide a significant improvement in accuracy. Whatever the case, nice covert!Little covert in 308 is a joy to shoot at night. Dead on sub 1/2 with fgmm 168, banging steel at night.
The TX60C has great sensitivity. Fun to watch the impacts from the heat heat signature defined from the hits whether it is cardboard or steel.
View attachment 8651391
Depending on rate of fire, contour, and barrel steel quality....it's entirely possible. It's burning 58+gr every shot, it ain't a 29.xgr 6br, lol. Op, are you letting next rd to be fired sit in a hot chamber very long(10+ sec)?Will there be fire cracking on a barrel that new?
That is a upper end load in my barrel, [email protected]. Not max pressure, but close to book max, and I didn't have more than 1-1.5gr until I got heavier bolt lift. Can't speak to ops load, but it isn't super mild.Aside from the things that have been mentioned, when I've had trouble with a barrel fouling after a few dozen rounds it's been because of the powder. Either the powder I used was overly dirty or I wasn't getting the pressure up to where the powder burned most efficiently.
H1000 is viewed as a relatively clean powder. Is the load you're using on the low side?
Just so people know, pretentious means showing or betraying an attitude of superiority!
Sirhr
It is $1,799.99 using an unnamed barrel blankPrice? And could you chamber the barrel for 223AI?
Might not be too far-fetched... I seem to recall a community organizer, possibly from Kenya.Ya. I'm sure the people actually running the party are gonna let a bar wench from new York be in charge.![]()
Right now the Supreme Court has no meaningful ability to control the behavior of lower court judges. My hope is that giving the SC this ability would be a moderating force. I think Justice Roberts would use this power, just not as often or as visibly as the rest of us would like. But at least there would be the possibility of clamping down on rebellious lower court judges like those in the 9th Circuit. Right now the only real way to change the courts is the nuclear option of Congress and the Executive intervening and if this happens we are going to get "change" but probably not for the better.Though SCOTUS is so political now with zealots on one side or the other filling the seats. The balance is only in numbers, not in reasonableness when it comes to interpreting the Constitution.
Do you really see Roberts, for example, disciplining lower court judges? Or any kind of sanctions coming from a court that has a history or its own activism or compromise?
Agree with the concept… the challenge is in the execution.
Sirhr