Re: Eberlestock Rifle Chassis
For what its worth:
I handled Glen's chassis at SHOT. He gave me an indepth review of it and I can say that I am very impressed. Honestly, I did not like its appearance in pictures, but in person, it is very sleek and attractive. It reminds me of a stealth fighter jet just a bit: not pretty until you realize its capability. If you want lightweight and minimalist, yet fully adjustable, this set-up will be hard to beat. The quality of it is remarkable, and from a manufacture's stand point, it is beyond reproach and justifies the price. Quality costs money, superior quality costs more. Add to that it is made in the USA, and well, we have standards here that other countries don't.
It may not be for everyone, granted. Neither is every car that rolls of an assembly line all across the globe. If you're happy witha Honda, by God, buy a Honda. If you appreciate something sleek, different and performance focused, maybe the price of the Corvette is not something you consider. Maybe it does not appeal to everyone's eye. It's a chassis. It's purpose is to appeal to our ability to carry the rifle to our target area and deliver the one shot we set afield to deliver. I think it will do just that. I look forward to testing it where it deserves to be tested: afield and on the range.
How many in the 1960s thought the M-16 was the ugliest rifle ever made? Now, in 2012, how attractive is the silhouette of an M-16 or M-4? If we don't evolve and accept new ideas, we would all still be shooting black powder.
I applaude Glen Eberle's inventive spirit and willingness to accept risk to create something new and unique, all out of his own pocket. Its risky, especially in today's economy. He did it anyway. We can all respect that, right?
Semper Fi,