Re: Defiance or Stiller or Surgeon?
How does this conversation turn with the news of Surgeon being bought out?
How does this conversation turn with the news of Surgeon being bought out?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
![]()
![]()
![]()
In this series of photo's the bolt on the left is a Surgeon, the right, a Templar(Defiance). Sorry, I dont have any Stiller bolts to compare.
I can think of 2 things, The shrouded bolt stop and the integral recoil lug.I'd be interested in anyone justifying the extra $300 of the Surgeon over Stiller action.
And don't say "integral scope rail." Having loctited all the scope rails I've ever owned, I've never had a single problem with them.
Hint: I said "justify" the extra cost.
Thanx.
I can think of 2 things, The shrouded bolt stop and the integral recoil lug.
That justifies the extra cost? For me no.
If you really want precision, look at BAT machine.
I'd be interested in anyone justifying the extra $300 of the Surgeon over Stiller action.
And don't say "integral scope rail." Having loctited all the scope rails I've ever owned, I've never had a single problem with them.
Hint: I said "justify" the extra cost.
Thanx.
So, here's a question for you, can you figure out why I would prefer to buy another Surgeon when a Stiller action is cheaper?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a trued remy just as good ? Why pay the big money for a custom when a rifle that's shoots just as good can be built cheaper? I have a 700 that hasn't been touched by a smith with a .260 cbi remage that shoots .5 min all day...
If my life actually regularly depended on this rifle I am building, I'd get the best of the best too. It doesn't. This is a range rifle. The paper / steel 1,000+ yards away presents no danger to me. I don't ever foresee it doing so. And I have yet to be told a functional difference between any of the named actions. (i.e. accuracy, smoothness of bolt operation, equipment failure of any one of them, etc)
Spend your money how you want. No question that's the right thing to do. But if you want to convince me I should spend my money the way you do, I need a reasoned explanation that goes beyond personal preference. And the attitude that "I'm a better human being because I spent more" is pretty certain to make me NOT spend my money the way you spend yours.
ETA: I also chose a Timney over a Jewell trigger. Excellent is good enuf for my uses, even where I'll concede Jewell may actually be better.
Garandman,
If price is your issue, get the Stiller and be done with it, but in my opinion from owning and using both actions, the Stiller Tac30 should not be compared with a Surgeon 591.
The Stiller is "dainty", feels lighter built, more delicate in comparison.
The Surgeon feels more robust, stronger, IMO better.
While my own experience with the Stiller Tac30 hasn't been satisfactory, IMO if you do not use it a lot or abuse it (rough or extreme conditions) then it may serve you well.
Some have reported problems with the bolt stop on the Stiller actions, however mine has not sheared.
The Surgeon action has more thread (>30% more), IMO clearly better.
The recoil lug is integral on the Surgeon, no additional cost for the part or fitting, IMO clearly better.
The rail is integral on the Surgeon, no additional cost for the part, no additional joint to work loose over time or become damaged/loosened by rough handling, IMO better.
The Surgeon bolt is one-piece, IMO clearly better.
My Stiller bolt is not, but I understand that Stiller has changed their bolts which is a very good thing IMO since Stiller bolt problems have been reported.
The benefits to the Stiller are that it is cheaper, you can get a LH, and you can get one that is opened for AW magazines, and these are good things if it will work OK for you.
Hope this helps.
I'm trying to figger out how people are shearing off the bolt stop. Are y'all hnging your open bolt rifles from the bolt handle and then pounding on them with a sledge hammer?
I see what Garandman is getting at when the almighty buck is involved. I'm not rich so I do as much research on a product before purchasing making the most of the money that i don't have.
Stiller tac338 - $1100
Surgeon 1581 XL - $1870
Badger M2013 xl - $1400
Defiance 338 -$1480
One thing that a guy might want to take note of is that some actions have an anti jam rail inside the action. I'm not sure which ones have this but it's just another thing.
Also for the Surgeon, do they come with bottom metal? I've always wondered this. I'm assuming not, but if they did that would be a pretty good price point.
I am currently planning a 338 build also and I ended up going with an M2013 just because of all the features that the action has and how well built it is. I spent a lot of time compairing action on line and in person and talking with a lot of people. My money is on the Badger.
xdeano
Can't help you there, people like to abuse their equipment. I can't imagine that it's as big of a problem as it's coming across. Maybe one guy has sheared a stop and it got a bad wrap. If it was a huge problem, i'm pretty sure the company would; a. stand behind the product, b. fixed the issue by making a stronger product. Probably a lot of talk.
xdeano
If I recall correctly, yes the Surgeon XL comes with BM.
For the 591 SA, the 591 WSM, and the 1086 LA the bottom metal is separate.
Take a look at the Shooting Times (March 17, 2011?) review by Richard Mann of the Les Baer Custom Tactical Recon (built on a Tac 30), seems he sheared it on his third day.
Prior to that there were a few others, could probably dig them up on here via the search function, but I do remember one member specifically that sheared his during a comp, which sucks.
It's not too bad, the bolt still works (provided you get any loose bit(s) of metal outa the way, just make sure you don't yank it too hard/far.
It's just a durability/dependability thing.
For weapons that are intended to be used, dependability matters IMO.
However, anything mechanical can and will break eventually.
Don't get me wrong, everything will break, everything. Uncle Murphy is always running around. Given the thousands of actions that have been sold and having only a hand full of guys breaking them isn't bad. IMO. I'm sure there has been a hell of a lot more malfunctions from Factory Remingtons breaking the silver soldered handles off which is more of a problem then a bolt release. I don't own any Stiller products, I just hate giving a bad review on something that is more then likely operator error. Am I wrong?
xdeano
Take a look at the Shooting Times (March 17, 2011?) review by Richard Mann of the Les Baer Custom Tactical Recon (built on a Tac 30), seems he sheared it on his third day.
Prior to that there were a few others, could probably dig them up on here via the search function, but I do remember one member specifically that sheared his during a comp, which sucks.
It's not too bad, the bolt still works (provided you get any loose bit(s) of metal outa the way, just make sure you don't yank it too hard/far.
It's just a durability/dependability thing.
For weapons that are intended to be used, dependability matters IMO.
However, anything mechanical can and will break eventually.