• Winner! Quick Shot Challenge: What’s the dumbest shooting myth you’ve heard?

    View thread

Rifle Scopes Trijicon Accupoint 1-6 circle cross

ICEMAN550

Private
Minuteman
Oct 2, 2018
19
4
First post. Anyway I ended up getting a great deal on a new Accupoint 1-6 with the circle cross reticle. I am just getting into 3-gun, but primarily just to keep sharp with my tools. I am active duty LEO for 19 1/2 years. My work rifle is a colt m4 10.5” with H2 Aimpoint. I picked up a vortex strike eagle 1-8 for my Daniel defense m4v11. I really didn’t like it. Mainly being used to a red dot, I wanted something with a a bigger eye box. I tried a Trijicon Accupoint 1-4 triangle a few months ago on a friend rifle and really liked it. Anyway picked up the circle cross reticle and glass is great, reticle is clear, but I am a little disappointed there are no holdover marks. The Accupoint was easy to zero and set turrets so I sighted it in at 100 yards. Just curious about anyone else’s experience with that reticle. I could dial in elevation easy enough and probably won’t be shooting over 300 yards where I live anyway. Sorry for the long intro. I probably should have held out for a different reticle, but this was on sale for $800. I have never had glass this clear so either way I am glad I bought it, just couldn’t find any reviews on it with the circle cross. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TacticalPlinker
XTR2
I probably could sell it. The reticle is great for accurate shots at closer range. I’m just looking to hear from anyone else who has used that reticle.
I ended up going with a Burris XTR2 1-5 after trying that exact scope. For 3 gun as well. It is heavier, but that's because it has extra features like zero stop, tactical turrets , and built to handle abuse.

I suggest you look check in out . The reticle choices are in ballistic drop or mils with mil adjustments. BRIGHT ! As in brighter than an Aimpoint - Eotech bright.

Since it's been out for a while the prices have dropped big time. I've seen below $700...
 
First post. Anyway I ended up getting a great deal on a new Accupoint 1-6 with the circle cross reticle. I am just getting into 3-gun, but primarily just to keep sharp with my tools. I am active duty LEO for 19 1/2 years. My work rifle is a colt m4 10.5” with H2 Aimpoint. I picked up a vortex strike eagle 1-8 for my Daniel defense m4v11. I really didn’t like it. Mainly being used to a red dot, I wanted something with a a bigger eye box. I tried a Trijicon Accupoint 1-4 triangle a few months ago on a friend rifle and really liked it. Anyway picked up the circle cross reticle and glass is great, reticle is clear, but I am a little disappointed there are no holdover marks. The Accupoint was easy to zero and set turrets so I sighted it in at 100 yards. Just curious about anyone else’s experience with that reticle. I could dial in elevation easy enough and probably won’t be shooting over 300 yards where I live anyway. Sorry for the long intro. I probably should have held out for a different reticle, but this was on sale for $800. I have never had glass this clear so either way I am glad I bought it, just couldn’t find any reviews on it with the circle cross. Thanks!

My favorite optic for 3 gun is the Trijicon AccuPower 1-8. It's awesome glass with nice size holdover marks for 3 gun. I made a load to match the 0.5 mil marks every 50 yards from 300 to 600. The illumination is very bright for close / bay targets and the optic is extremely forgiving of head position for really weird shit we do in 3 gun sometimes. It's very sturdy and I have had zero issues with it as a 3 gun / PRS training rifle. I think the AccuPoint series is more targeted towards the hunting crowd than the 3 gunners. The glass like you mentioned is great but the reticle leaves something to be desired for 3 gun.
 
My favorite optic for 3 gun is the Trijicon AccuPower 1-8. It's awesome glass with nice size holdover marks for 3 gun. I made a load to match the 0.5 mil marks every 50 yards from 300 to 600. The illumination is very bright for close / bay targets and the optic is extremely forgiving of head position for really weird shit we do in 3 gun sometimes. It's very sturdy and I have had zero issues with it as a 3 gun / PRS training rifle. I think the AccuPoint series is more targeted towards the hunting crowd than the 3 gunners. The glass like you mentioned is great but the reticle leaves something to be desired for 3 gun.

Yes. The accupower reticle in an Accupoint would be perfect. Is the glass on the Accupower better or about the same as the Accupoint in your opinion?
 
I actually have a Burris MTAC on a different AR with a similar reticle. I think the MTAC was clearer glass than the strike eagle 1-8, but still not like the Trijicon. Is the XTR ii 1-5 a big step up from the MTAC
The glass is about the same between the AccuPoint 1-6 and AccuPower 1-8. Both are leaps and bounds ahead of the Burris XTRII which I also had and am glad I upgraded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICEMAN550
You must be at least 18 years of age to use this site
You confirm that you are at least 18 years of age by continuing to use the site.