You are the threat,...
- Thread starter Gunfighter14e2
- Start date
They wouldn't have out tons of people in jail for "crimes " that aren't a crime at all
So wrong there too
Edit. Some people aren't for freedom at all. More for control.
So wrong there too
Edit. Some people aren't for freedom at all. More for control.
maybe thats why he should be hanged for treason.
Another thing, dont try to use the governments cowardice in dealing with treasonous people as an excuse to take constitutional rights away... The government let the 911 terrorists come here, the government let osama metastasize,,, refused to kill him when they had the chance... dont import threats to our country then use it as an excuse to trample on my Constitution,,, its not gonna work.
Another thing, dont try to use the governments cowardice in dealing with treasonous people as an excuse to take constitutional rights away... The government let the 911 terrorists come here, the government let osama metastasize,,, refused to kill him when they had the chance... dont import threats to our country then use it as an excuse to trample on my Constitution,,, its not gonna work.
Last edited:
AJ plays the constitution maneuver for the checkmate
Not defending that douche in NM either, he probably should be in jail which tells me he is probably a CI...
Banning firearms from released felons from jail is unconstitutional.
Releasing dangerous people from jail is wrong and stupid.
If they’re too dangerous to own a gun then they should remain in jail.
Releasing dangerous people from jail is wrong and stupid.
If they’re too dangerous to own a gun then they should remain in jail.
Thank you. I couldn't say it better myself, simple, succinct, and correct. You my friend get the much coveted "Daily Orson".
People I have known an associated with in, Indiana, Ill, Mi, Fla, Al, & Ga. plus a few in Fed LE,...
Robert Mueller let Whitey Bulger run a murderous criminal enterprise for years, killing the shit out of plenty of people, a litteral mass murderer, then kept known innocent people in jail for many years..... dont think your gov wont do that, they do and they do it for stupid frikken reasons like budget enhancements.. and just because some of them are evil zealots.
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-mueller-political-zealot/2018/04/08/id/853235/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usne...ia-murders-uranium-one-and-other-fbi-scandals
https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-mueller-political-zealot/2018/04/08/id/853235/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usne...ia-murders-uranium-one-and-other-fbi-scandals
The constitution is not law, its more of a guidline. Only federal law matters. 20,000 gun laws prove this.
Marbury Vs Madison says otherwise and so does the tenth amendment
As well as auto's from Drunks, Prescription pads from some Dr's, an a host of others. However all we are doing is blaming an item/tool for a humans behavior with same. Way not ban people from owning a car?
Not sure where you’re going with^^^. Of all the above mentioned, none are constitutional rights.
If someone is dangerous they should be separated from society until they aren’t. Whether it’s a year, month, or life.
Why would we stop an American from protecting our border from an invasion?
www.washingtonexaminer.com
And why would we put up with this shit?
Mexican troops disarmed American soldiers on US side of the border - Washington Examiner
Armed Mexican troops disarmed two United States soldiers while they were on the American side of the border, U.S. defense officials have said. U.S. Northern Command said in a statement that "five to six Mexican military personnel questioned two U.S. Army soldiers who were conducting border...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
And why would we put up with this shit?
While I’m grateful for recognition, I smell a controversy. Pretty sure someone else won that today.
HOLY SHIT BENDER!
Don’t sneak up on us like that!
Nothing all day then outta nowhere....
Did I already issue the Orson? Spill it man when did this happen? One of my 13.5 personalities may be loose again. Oh my...mistakes like this cannot be tolerated. I must get to the bottom of this.
Finally!!!! Marbury vs Madison for fucks sake!!!!
I’m thinking he was kidding. I hope...
And dammit you darn near went all day without yanking you’re Marbury out
Are you offended?
This has been the most civil thread on this subject that I ever seen on this forum.
This has been the most civil thread on this subject that I ever seen on this forum.
Put down the mushroom book.
Pick up the reloading book.
You should be just fine.
True but that is a one time tactic, Marbury grounds creates precedent that crushes despotic arguments forever forward..
Only a one off when a jury box is full of sheep/lackeys. Yes there are major issues in this country but never forget the lazy people, of this country, caused most of it. We can blame the gov, LE or men from mars, but the bottom line is the people of this country pussy'ed up an took the easy way out most all the time, to bring us to this point,....
That’s true.....
You’ve been calm and civil...
No typo’s...
Not much profanity....
Whoever has Aj’s Phone, give it back to him now. While you still can.
If Marbury vs Madison actually mattered, how are all govt allowed to enforce this. Our omni powerful govt does as they please...because they have all the power. I cannot remember in my lifetime a large group of people standing against them...and well putting them in their place.
bad example but an example nonetheless, Bundy Ranch
It does matter and your government is not allowed to do most of the shit it is doing... Its up to us to reimpose Constitutional limits, no matter what it takes.
A better example - Trump
It does matter and your government is not allowed to do most of the shit it is doing... Its up to us to reimpose Constitutional limits, no matter what it takes.
A better example - Trump
The Fifth Amendment is that you shall not be deprived the right to life, liberty and property without due process of law. The Declaration of Independence had the phrase of pursuit of happiness..... often confused.
Think about the initial discussion..... should a convicted felon (any I don't know what he was convicted of) be in possession of a gun, on the news, bringing attention to himself, doing something that is the subject of great debate?? The guy, irrespective of what you think of his cause, brought this on himself and simply was not acting in his own best interest. I think we learned in kindergarten that two wrongs don't make a right..... in this case, one of those wrongs will land that guys ass in jail.
We can argue who should or shouldn't carry a gun as well, but no one in law enforcement is going to allow their CI to carry a gun.... that is movie bullshit. If someone's CI is carrying a gun, they are not doing it working with the police... you can't make decisions for people when they are not in your presence.
I believe in free speech,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I also believe most people should shut the hell up because they have no idea what they are talking about.
I devoutly believe in the 2nd amendment. I also believe that convicted felons, the mentally unhinged and non-citizens do not have the right to own guns. If you think felons should be allowed to buy guns,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I know that you sure as hell do not know any felons.
I devoutly believe in the 2nd amendment. I also believe that convicted felons, the mentally unhinged and non-citizens do not have the right to own guns. If you think felons should be allowed to buy guns,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,I know that you sure as hell do not know any felons.
You beat me to it.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
But, yeah, Class C is still a felony.
His felony was impersonating a law enforcement officer in 1986.
Mike Vickers needs a nicely tooled leather gun belt with an Ivory stocked 1911 suspended there from.
I know a felon that served 5 years in Leavenworth,he was a devout Christian till the day he died.
His crime- he volunteered for service during WWII and refused to take up arms to kill a man but asked if he could serve in another capacity.
Times have changed, today they would have given him an award.
I knew him 50+ years and he lived by the bible.
You sound like a statist tool. Or just your typical run of the mill elitist gun owner.
*not that there's anything wrong with that
Who are you to decide who "needs" a gun.
Oh yeah get in a fist fight no gun for you.
Have that cops come to your house for a domestic disturbance. No gun for you.
Have someone lie for some red flag bs. No gun for you.
Etc x about 10000 petty bs prohibiting offenses.
Don't confuse "convicted felon" and disorderly persons offenses that occurred and have not seen the inside of a courtroom. A convicted felon is someone who has plead guilty or been found guilty of a felony. That would be after court, they plead guilty to it or were found guilty of it by a judge or even perhaps by a jury of their peers. Prior to taking a plea deal or going to trial you should remember all of what came before that event occurred. If you don't have the ability to think all of that through first, then perhaps you shouldn't own a gun.......
And who would you be to say anything contrary? as you have asked the other guy in this thread?
OK whatever but it was not I who said this guy could not have a gun. He refused to carry one to defend his country, so it is he who decided, as a matter between him and God that he would not carry a gun. Not that I expect you to get it. But if you think your family will be safer around armed violent felons move to Chicago.
It would also seem that thy guy who was the subject of this thread isn't too smart, even though we already established that. He was convicted of impersonating a law enforcement officer in 1986. 20 years later gets caught with a gun that he can't have and gets in trouble again. Now, fast forward, the same guy, pretends to "police the border, while armed'"...and gets himself in some shit again...... you cannot fix stupid... maybe someone that "not smart" should not have a gun.....?
