Different perspective & another reason to remember 4/19/95 OKC
I could go off on a pages long tangent of cause and effect, good vs evil, etc centered around OKC. I remember it well, like many other major events.
I was driving to work in my Chevy K30 listening to talk radio when it came across.
What's never brought to light is that this one evil event & the way our gov chose to respond is continuing to cost us and future generations, both $'s & freedom!
Not exactly a trust inspiring signal our gov is proud to share with us, but as a result of OKC our gov & it's employees, although not obvious are essentially working in hardened forts surrounded by security moats to protect them from us!
In my opinion this is in the same vain as wanting to disarm citizens while surrounding themselves with armed protection details. Exception being, the above is completely institutionalized with no opposing view and largely unknown to the General public who is paying for it.
My best conservative guess would be cost resulting from OKC at near 250 billion to date and counting, probably more in tax dollars/deficit.
Before you call me crazy think about this:
- It was OKC not 911 that resulted in every new and retrofit Fed building since, to be built with Blast level spec's
- The Blast spec's were written based on OKC
- I have first hand experience with this, having worked with people that actually did the studies on OKC and wrote the specs based on them. This was in the 2011 time frame and it was crystal clear these specs had almost zero influence from 911. OKC was the topic & standard upon which specs were based.
- Blast spec construction can easily add 30-40% to total construction cost
- 25+ Billion a year for Fed gov construction x 25 years x 30% cost increase = a Fuck load of our $ to protect them from us.
The excerpt below was just a random quick grab off the internet, nothing I was involved with. You'll notice the wording states "
Minimum Anti terrorism standards".
Sounds pretty inocuous, legit even. Almost like their protecting themselves from a foreign enemy. That wording was changed after 911 & this project was from 2009, but think about it WTF is blast protection going to offer against a plane hmm? Trust me the anti terrorism standard has very little to due with a foreign threat.
View attachment 7303975
View attachment 7303971
View attachment 7303979