Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would at least cut the error in half maybe a little more considering the scope will have more internal adjustment. I’m guessing with the equipment you proposed , the rifle would almost zero. Gotta pay to play homie.Screw a crooked barrel into a TL3 action with a Sphur mount, and TT scope, and see where your zero ends up.![]()
![]()
Is there a gas leak in here or something???
Well he is correct.
Buys one of the cheapest worst designed Bolt action rifles with a long history of failure
Buys a low brand chincese import junk scope
Buys no name Chinese junk 2 piece base
Buys no name Chinese junk rings
Wonders why results are less than optimal. If you cant afford atleast decent quality then you can't afford this game. Thems is the breaks.
Laughs in AI, Sako, Tikka and ARC.I have a couple of savage rifles that I would gladly put up against whatever you have if you want to put your money were your mouth is.
Or are you just full of shit ?
Whoopty fucking do, it's not the brand it's the person behind it pulling the trigger.Laughs in AI, Sako, Tikka and ARC.
Over the last 30+ years what single brand of rifle has failed in more LR precision courses than all other combined.......................Savage.
You can shoot tiny groups on a square range where you baby the gun. Any decent barrel will shoot.
Oh yea the illustrious $400 rack grade savage that shoots sub 1/4MOA with off the shelf hunting ammo. Every gun club has atleast one of them. Funny how the can never repeat it when you ask them to show you.
Field shooting kills them. Sorry to break it to ya.
Nope. Not the point of this thread.After reading three pages of this stuff, I guess my take away is that it might be a good idea to shoot a gun as bone stock as possible before you start bolting a bunch of parts on.
Nobody gives a goddamn about your opinion of Savage.Over the last 30+ years what single brand of rifle has failed in more LR precision courses than all other combined.......................Savage.
You can shoot tiny groups on a square range where you baby the gun. Any decent barrel will shoot.
Oh yea the illustrious $400 rack grade savage that shoots sub 1/4MOA with off the shelf hunting ammo. Every gun club has atleast one of them. Funny how the can never repeat it when you ask them to show you.
Field shooting kills them. Sorry to break it to ya.
By my calculations, a 24" barrel would only need a 0.33" bend to account for 14 mils @ 100 yds.To have enough bend that looking through the breech would show the muzzle end as an ellipse, you would be able to tell it was bent from a cursory visual inspection of the exterior.
By my calculations, a 24" barrel would only need a 0.33" bend to account for 14 mils @ 100 yds.
With the bore of the 6.5 Creed being so much smaller than the cartridge base, it would be much easier to overlook the bend while centering that small point of light in the relatively large black hole of the chamber.
Just a theory.
In all seriousness he could shoot it upside down or even sideways and that would tell if the barrel was bent.By my calculations, a 24" barrel would only need a 0.33" bend to account for 14 mils @ 100 yds.
With the bore of the 6.5 Creed being so much smaller than the cartridge base, it would be much easier to overlook the bend while centering that small point of light in the relatively large black hole of the chamber.
Just a theory.
To have enough bend that looking through the breech would show the muzzle end as an ellipse, you would be able to tell it was bent from a cursory visual inspection of the exterior.
Yeah, I think we’re on the same page. Some are suggesting to look down the breech to see if the bore opening looks eclipsed. If it were that bent, you could see it from the outside. It doesn’t take that much bend to throw a shot off by what the OP is observing. In fact, nightforce made a scope mount that could account for that much- a 50 moa rail, though the only one I found was for a Rem 700...By my calculations, a 24" barrel would only need a 0.33" bend to account for 14 mils @ 100 yds.
With the bore of the 6.5 Creed being so much smaller than the cartridge base, it would be much easier to overlook the bend while centering that small point of light in the relatively large black hole of the chamber.
Just a theory.
Yeah, I think we’re on the same page. Some are suggesting to look down the breech to see if the bore opening looks eclipsed. If it were that bent, you could see it from the outside. It doesn’t take that much bend to throw a shot off by what the OP is observing. In fact, nightforce made a scope mount that could account for that much- a 50 moa rail, though the only one I found was for a Rem 700...
By my calculations, a 24" barrel would only need a 0.33" bend to account for 14 mils @ 100 yds.
6.5 creed. Savage(ya ya I know) . Sight mark. 2 piece cheep rings and base.
None of this gear would I choose but it's his money.
Let's stay off the shifty gear choices because is shouldn't effect the barrel sending rounds 14 mils low from bore sighting.
Swapped to a reliable vortex amg and one piece base and got the same results.
That's the point. The bore sight should at least hit the 4x4 target board. This makes me think something else major is wrong.
Nope. we checked all this.
Nope. flat 2 piece bases. and we measured the bases and rings to make sure they were not sloped.
How will rings change the fact the bore site down the barrel was 14 mils off?
You all seem to be missing the point. We changed scope, rings and basses to a quality setup and we still got the same results. This eliminated the scope and scope mounting from being the issue. From the bore site the barrel is pointed a the target but the impact is 14 mils low. How can the barrel be pointed at the target but the impact be 14 mils low? Yes, we bore sighted other rifles that day and each of them were on paper at 100 yards first shot. Not my first rodeo.
One thing we though about doing was loosening the barrel nut and turning the barrel out 1/4 turn. This will mess up the head spacing but if the rifle shoots 14 mils to the right we know its a barrel issue.
After reading three pages of this stuff, I guess my take away is that it might be a good idea to shoot a gun as bone stock as possible before you start bolting a bunch of parts on. (obviously need a scope and mount here, but otherwise...)
I get that building out in one go seems cool, and if everything goes right, you look super awesome, but when they don't, and the "what the *&^% is wrong game begins, and you don't know where to start.
If the barrel or action is out of spec, it will be a lot easier to get the maker to take the gun back (in as built condition) and make it right when your phone call doesn't start with "we changed a bunch of things on this gun, and it doesn't work..."
Local Gun shop he bought it from is sending it back to Savage.
Anyone know how long it should take to get is back? Is this a 3 week for 3 months wait?
Thanks
A friend of mine sent one back this summer for oversized scope base holes. They ended up replacing the action and I think it was about 2 months.Local Gun shop he bought it from is sending it back to Savage.
Anyone know how long it should take to get is back? Is this a 3 week for 3 months wait?
Thanks
Laughs in AI, Sako, Tikka and ARC.
This is precisely why I asked about this in a public forum. None of it made sense. I don't think we could see the barrel bend through the the bore. We are aligning concentric circles when we bore sight through the bore and this 0.1" bend was not observable.The part of this that is baffling to me is that you have aligned the bore with the scope POA so at 100 the impact should have been close. I've done the pull the bolt, line the rifle up on the orange dot and bring the reticle to the dot trick every time I've mounted a new scope and they are usually a little off but like you say, on a sheet of 8½x11. It makes not sense that the bore and the scope are pointed to the same place and the bullet doesn't end up there.
Did you try dropping a 6.5 bullet in the muzzle, and is the fired brass blown out? I swear it sounds like rattling a 6.5 down a 7mm barrel.
Hey, before you laugh too hard, I had a guy shooting next to me one day figure out after 3 shots that he was trying to shoot 6s in a 7 and they wouldn't reach the target at 1000.
how is it in any way possible to close the bolt on a 270 win with a 308 chamber?Try to shoot it at 25 yards or closer and see if what the hole looks like on paper. My guess is it’s a mismarked barrel. I had rifle that was marked 270 win and it was actually a 308. It was doing the same thing.
You bench quigleyford concrete or whatever the saying is. Weakling.how is it in any way possible to close the bolt on a 270 win with a 308 chamber?
Either troll or you shouldn't even be allowed a library cardTry to shoot it at 25 yards or closer and see if what the hole looks like on paper. My guess is it’s a mismarked barrel. I had rifle that was marked 270 win and it was actually a 308. It was doing the same thing.
When you run a bolt like you’re supposed to you don’t even notice it.how is it in any way possible to close the bolt on a 270 win with a 308 chamber?