I have a Kimber, Sig, Ed Brown, Wilson Combat in .45 ACP...........they all shoot well, but my EDC is a Wilson Combat EDCX9.......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just combine the 2 and put the death nail in the 1911 already.
My suggestion would be go to your local store and grab different ones, see what you like, how they feel, and how you can manipulate each one.
Glocks are ugly but rarely fail. But without an exterior, mechanical safety, that can be an issue for some.
If you know and like 1911s, why not stick with it? Kimber makes some on the smaller side but are very expensive.
This kind of "opinion thread" will usually start circling the drain when guys start arguing why this choice is got, that choice is bad, and 9mm rules all. Everyone will have an opinion which may or may nor be right for you.
If you’re going to limit your capacity with a fat round, why not go 10mm and at least get something out of the deal?
I've never limited my capacity. I always load the mags with eight rounds...and carry spares.
I mean normally a gun that’s offered in 9 or 45, if you got 8 of 45 the same gun would take more rounds in the 9mm model
Why not use the platform/caliber that works best for "you?"
For sure, to each their own, but in that context I’d CCW a 22LR, actually the 380 version of my CCW shoots much smoother and nicer than my 9.
I just figure a CCW is a straight combat weapon, <7yrd shots, high stress, if it can go wrong it will, reloads might not be practical, as much energy on target as fast as possible.
Based on the CCTV shooting videos I’ve seen, gel tests, etc I don’t get 45 outside of the romance of it, I’d love to have a WWII 45 1911, but not for CCW duty.
For the task 9mm HSTs seem to make sense, something can also be said for 40 capacity to energy ratio, outside of human type threats 357sig (kinda sorta), 10mm makes tons of sense, 44mag and up if you’re way up north, I just can’t wrap my head around 45, 380, etc. However based on some of the homicides in ghetto areas, 380s 22s 410s and kitchen knives all seem to be able to stack bodies, I just think with foresight and the ability to choose, if you’re going to sacrifice quantity for diameter, why not just go 10mm.
Like quarters in a video game, more you have the longer you’re going to be in the game, if I’m giving up my game time I really need each round to count quantifiably so
To each their own![]()
For sure, to each their own, but in that context I’d CCW a 22LR, actually the 380 version of my CCW shoots much smoother and nicer than my 9.
I just figure a CCW is a straight combat weapon, <7yrd shots, high stress, if it can go wrong it will, reloads might not be practical, as much energy on target as fast as possible.
Based on the CCTV shooting videos I’ve seen, gel tests, etc I don’t get 45 outside of the romance of it, I’d love to have a WWII 45 1911, but not for CCW duty.
For the task 9mm HSTs seem to make sense, something can also be said for 40 capacity to energy ratio, outside of human type threats 357sig (kinda sorta), 10mm makes tons of sense, 44mag and up if you’re way up north, I just can’t wrap my head around 45, 380, etc. However based on some of the homicides in ghetto areas, 380s 22s 410s and kitchen knives all seem to be able to stack bodies, I just think with foresight and the ability to choose, if you’re going to sacrifice quantity for diameter, why not just go 10mm.
Like quarters in a video game, more you have the longer you’re going to be in the game, if I’m giving up my game time I really need each round to count quantifiably so
To each their own![]()
Knew a guy that lived and breathed tactical journals. He once scoffed at the notion of me carrying a back up mag as gunfights lasted three seconds/three rounds. I said, "So, you only load three rounds?"
I go back to one of my earlier posts: Started carrying a Government Model before we knew it was to big and too heavy. In 30 years I suspect younger generations will scoff at Glocks for carry. As Prof Massey said, "You are what you were when."
Many folks live in states that limit the amount of freedom a gun can carry.
In that case a .45 is a really nice option.
10mm (in a power load that is worth having) is often too snappy for a lot of folks, especially out of a light gun.
9mm has capacity going for it and smaller / thinner / lighter guns.
Sure you can make yourself feel good about the 9mm by watching a bunch of YouTube videos where some 9mm evangelist runs the latest, greatest +P+ 9mm SD round vs some old 1911 ball ammo. Try that same test again using the latest greatest +P .45 ACP ammunition and things come out differently.
The usual reason carrying a .45 isn't done as much, is size and weight.
Nobody has ever wanted to have less rounds in a fight, but at the same time, whatever gun you can hit most accurately, first shot and then repeat shots with is probably going to trump most other points in an actual fight.
Statist BS “laws” aside, If pistol X in 45 takes 40% less ammo in the same frame, will each round of 45 do 140% the damage of a the same FMJHP in 9?
Most likely yes, depending on ammunition.
A lot depends on the threat.
Generally if you are looking at a lone attacker you probably won't be shooting more than 5 or so regardless.
If you are throwing a party for Antifa and need to bring enough party favours for everyone, then capacity rules
(and where is your AR?) Same goes for a home invasion group.
I bought some tape custom made for the xds that fills some of the 'cheese grater' grip. I usually run about 4 or 5 magazines at a time at the range and I've never experienced chaffing on my hands. I work outside on a farm but have pretty soft hands. I like the gun because it's easy to conceal, I shoot it really well and really quick considering it's a 3.3" .45 acp. I shoot it better and faster than I do my sig 938. Damn nice little gun that makes at least .45" holes.I was looking at the XDS before I decided to by the Shield. To me, the grip was a little short and the damn thing was like a "cheese grater" in my hand and I work with my hands, so, not "soft" either.
My Smith, is the M2.0 version, so the grip is a little more "textured", then the origional Shield, but not a cheese grater. How do you like yours, out of curiosity? Mac
In many home invasions just the sight of the gun with a aggressive home owner behind it gets them running, that worked for me in that situation
@EddieNFL and @TurboTrout The 1911 weighs in at 40 oz. 1.2" thick, the Glock 21 is 38 oz. 1.34" thick, and the Glock 30 is 34 oz. 1.38" thick (Empty weights thickness from web sites. I can weigh and post if anyone wants real world numbers.) Golden Sabre .45 ACP +P185 gn chronos at 1013 fps avg from the Glock 30 (10 round average my gear). I never felt under gunned with the 30 and +P's. The .45 +P's are the same velocity as 10mm Federal Hydra Shok, but low end for some of the higher pressure 10mm, Buffalo Bore, etc..
See, too big and heavy to carry. If I had known that in 1974, who knows what I would carry.
I count on the size of the muzzle to just scare away any threats.
Gov 1911 in one hand, dick in the other. Aint nobody messing with that.
I'm not sure 9mm is up to the task either. I saw a video of that female cop who emptied a complete mag in-between clearing a stoppage like a champ and that was barely enough. I'm not sure many could have done a better job than her, yet that weapon was almost not enough. She was definitely walking the line. Do we have videos of .45 acp doing the same thing? I haven't seen any. It may just be that handguns in general suck and that is the best you can do. It sure was not impressive other than her skills. Looking at her i never would have guessed she had that level of skill in a pressure situation.For sure, to each their own, but in that context I’d CCW a 22LR, actually the 380 version of my CCW shoots much smoother and nicer than my 9.
I just figure a CCW is a straight combat weapon, <7yrd shots, high stress, if it can go wrong it will, reloads might not be practical, as much energy on target as fast as possible.
Based on the CCTV shooting videos I’ve seen, gel tests, etc I don’t get 45 outside of the romance of it, I’d love to have a WWII 45 1911, but not for CCW duty.
For the task 9mm HSTs seem to make sense, something can also be said for 40 capacity to energy ratio, outside of human type threats 357sig (kinda sorta), 10mm makes tons of sense, 44mag and up if you’re way up north, I just can’t wrap my head around 45, 380, etc. However based on some of the homicides in ghetto areas, 380s 22s 410s and kitchen knives all seem to be able to stack bodies, I just think with foresight and the ability to choose, if you’re going to sacrifice quantity for diameter, why not just go 10mm.
Like quarters in a video game, more you have the longer you’re going to be in the game, if I’m giving up my game time I really need each round to count quantifiably so
To each their own![]()
I agree, the Sig P220 would be very excellent. It is narrow enough to CCW relatively easily. Carries 8 rounds, and uses single stack mags. Gray Guns makes aftermarket trigger parts, which are great. I have 7 Sigs, and they all have GGI upgrade parts.I rebuild/customize 1911s for myself and clients; have a fleet of them. But if you're serious about CCW: Sig P220 carry all day, every day.
View attachment 7597737
@EddieNFL and @TurboTrout The 1911 weighs in at 40 oz. 1.2" thick, the Glock 21 is 38 oz. 1.34" thick, and the Glock 30 is 34 oz. 1.38" thick (Empty weights thickness from web sites. I can weigh and post if anyone wants real world numbers.) Golden Sabre .45 ACP +P185 gn chronos at 1013 fps avg from the Glock 30 (10 round average my gear). I never felt under gunned with the 30 and +P's. The .45 +P's are the same velocity as 10mm Federal Hydra Shok, but low end for some of the higher pressure 10mm, Buffalo Bore, etc..
From what I've read, shouldn't you just rack the action on an 870?