Rifle Scopes Steiner T6Xi 3-18x56 Review and comparison with NF ATACR 4-16x42, S&B US 3-20x50 and March 4.5-28x52

#101
dogman said:
I know the Steiner has great eyebox forgiveness, but can anyone provide experience on eyebox between the Steiner and the NF NX8 2.5-20x50?

This is for a 600-ish yd 556 carbine. I'm leaning NF if eyebox is passable. I have a 4-16x42 ATACR on myLMT, which is amazing, but I'm trying to glass for a bit less ducats.
Click to expand...
I have the T6Xi 3-18x56 and a friend has the NX8 2.5-20. I really like his scope, the eye box was much more usable than what i was expecting after reading on here about how tight it was. The reticle thickness was also suitable for the mag range. I think it might be a better scope for the hunting/cross over rifle I’m putting together compared to my T6Xi. But the Steiner has a more forgiving eye box. And it has the MSR2. It’s great for my needs but I wish it was a pound lighter and the illumination was brighter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dogman
#107
Guns&WhiteWater said:
I have the T6Xi 3-18x56 and a friend has the NX8 2.5-20. I really like his scope, the eye box was much more usable than what i was expecting after reading on here about how tight it was. The reticle thickness was also suitable for the mag range. I think it might be a better scope for the hunting/cross over rifle I’m putting together compared to my T6Xi. But the Steiner has a more forgiving eye box. And it has the MSR2. It’s great for my needs but I wish it was a pound lighter and the illumination was brighter. There’s some dark hollers here.
Click to expand...
Eyebox can be pretty subjective and dependent on platform, a lot of shooters aren’t bothered as much as others with finicky eyebox. Saw this a lot with the March 3-24x52, some were really bothered while others had little issue.
 
#108
Glassaholic said:
Eyebox can be pretty subjective and dependent on platform, a lot of shooters aren’t bothered as much as others with finicky eyebox. Saw this a lot with the March 3-24x52, some were really bothered while others had little issue.
Click to expand...
Agreed. A tighter eyebox, or a less forgiving eyebox, however you want to word it, doesn’t mean it’s not enjoyable to use. And it may or may not be noticeable if you just shoot from static positions like a bench. It’s just one metric to compare of many that round out a scope. But I would always opt for a more forgiving eyebox given the choice. Same as a wider field of view, greater depth of field, less CA, less visible eye piece ring border, etc. Some scopes just cause less eye fatigue and easy eye boxes seem to help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surferjoe and Glassaholic
#109
After comparing my s&b 3-20 us, leupold mk5 5-25, razor lht 4.5 22 and atacr 4-16 I have decided to keep the atacr 4-16 and razor lht 4.5-22. I just got rid of the mk5 5-25 and am going to post the s&b 3-20 us up for sale . I think s&b 3-20 is phenomenal and it deserves all the hype it gets.
The glass, fit and finish and overall viewing experience is incredible. The mk5 is good as well but it's just not on the level of the s&b 3-20 . I mainly shoot gas guns, 556 and 308 and I just think the atacr 4-16 works with these platforms the best. As an overall package, turrets, magnification adjustment and size and weight the atacr 4-16 with mil xt reticle is my top choice. The razor lht 4.5-22 for its weight savings, glass charity, reticle and overall features is a good 2nd choice for me when I want to cut down on weight. My only real personal gripe with s&b 3-20 us is that I can't get it with a tree reticle like the mil xt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glassaholic, Shoreglide and dogman
#110
WILLSMITH030382 said:
After comparing my s&b 3-20 us, leupold mk5 5-25, razor lht 4.5 22 and atacr 4-16 I have decided to keep the atacr 4-16 and razor lht 4.5-22. I just got rid of the mk5 5-25 and am going to post the s&b 3-20 us up for sale . I think s&b 3-20 is phenomenal and it deserves all the hype it gets.
The glass, fit and finish and overall viewing experience is incredible. The mk5 is good as well but it's just not on the level of the s&b 3-20 . I mainly shoot gas guns, 556 and 308 and I just think the atacr 4-16 works with these platforms the best. As an overall package, turrets, magnification adjustment and size and weight the atacr 4-16 with mil xt reticle is my top choice. The razor lht 4.5-22 for its weight savings, glass charity, reticle and overall features is a good 2nd choice for me when I want to cut down on weight. My only real personal gripe with s&b 3-20 us is that I can't get it with a tree reticle like the mil xt.
Click to expand...
If Schmidt offers their new TR2ID reticle in the US 3-20 it could re-awaken interest. Also, don’t discount the 5-20 for gas guns, I think 5-20 with offset RDS is a killer combo
 
  • Like
Reactions: WILLSMITH030382
#111
@Glassaholic … is there anything new coming out within the next 6mo in this segment.

I’m trying to find the ‘perfect fit me’ MPVO for a hunting rifle that can crossover for range fun. Scoured all the options and I’m leaning towards the ATACR (dislike rotating ocular), also like the TT315M (just not sure I wanna pay the premium and I’m just lukewarm on their reticle), minox ZP5 315 (a bit heavier than ideal). Hate to pull the trigger on something and have regrets if there is something more ideal coming out soon.

Something <30oz, 3/4x on low end 15-20x high end, great glass, smaller size (not too long, lower profile turrets, 50mm or less obj).
 
#112
kskevin said:
@Glassaholic … is there anything new coming out within the next 6mo in this segment.

I’m trying to find the ‘perfect fit me’ MPVO for a hunting rifle that can crossover for range fun. Scoured all the options and I’m leaning towards the ATACR (dislike rotating ocular), also like the TT315M (just not sure I wanna pay the premium and I’m just lukewarm on their reticle), minox ZP5 315 (a bit heavier than ideal). Hate to pull the trigger on something and have regrets if there is something more ideal coming out soon.

Something <30oz, 3/4x on low end 15-20x high end, great glass, smaller size (not too long, lower profile turrets, 50mm or less obj).
Click to expand...
Not going to speak for @Glassaholic but Steiner has new 2-12 and 3-18 H6xi optics that you might want to check out. They are currently only available in MOA but Mil variants are supposedly in the works and look like they could be a nice fit on a hunting rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glassaholic and kskevin
#113
kskevin said:
@Glassaholic … is there anything new coming out within the next 6mo in this segment.

I’m trying to find the ‘perfect fit me’ MPVO for a hunting rifle that can crossover for range fun. Scoured all the options and I’m leaning towards the ATACR (dislike rotating ocular), also like the TT315M (just not sure I wanna pay the premium and I’m just lukewarm on their reticle), minox ZP5 315 (a bit heavier than ideal). Hate to pull the trigger on something and have regrets if there is something more ideal coming out soon.

Something <30oz, 3/4x on low end 15-20x high end, great glass, smaller size (not too long, lower profile turrets, 50mm or less obj).
Click to expand...
There will always be something just over the horizon. Your best bet is to buy something used that you won't loose much money on of you need to sell.

Steiner say the Mil HX scopes are coming summer but Burris took 3 years to release an illuminated XTR3 which was always coming soon.

I say buy a 4-16x42 ATACR if you like the reticle options.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guns&WhiteWater, Glassaholic and WILLSMITH030382
#115
kskevin said:
@Glassaholic … is there anything new coming out within the next 6mo in this segment.

I’m trying to find the ‘perfect fit me’ MPVO for a hunting rifle that can crossover for range fun. Scoured all the options and I’m leaning towards the ATACR (dislike rotating ocular), also like the TT315M (just not sure I wanna pay the premium and I’m just lukewarm on their reticle), minox ZP5 315 (a bit heavier than ideal). Hate to pull the trigger on something and have regrets if there is something more ideal coming out soon.

Something <30oz, 3/4x on low end 15-20x high end, great glass, smaller size (not too long, lower profile turrets, 50mm or less obj).
Click to expand...

The new Leupold Mark 7HD 2-14x42, 3-21x44, 4-28x52 and 5-35x56 look interesting but I’m 3 days shy of 04/01 (meaning that is just a joke. There is no Leupold Mark 7 line that I am aware of.)
Seriously, I would not hold out for anything we do not already have available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrandeJake, Shoreglide and TheBigCountry
#117
For those of you that have used both or better yet have them side by side. NX8 vs T6Xi? I'm wanting to let my T6Xi go cause I can tell my Mars H is going to get heavy fast. Could shed almost half a pound moving to the NX8, H6Xi, or another 30mm tube based ultra-short. I've compared my T6Xi directly to a friends 4-16 ATACR and thought it was quite comparable. So by nature I think i'd be stepping down in glass quality but figured I'd ask. The latest NX8s I've been behind were impressive, especially the 4-32.
 
#118
Will I didn’t have them side by side, but I was not unimpressed with my friends 2.5-20, as I was expecting to be. I really liked it. I was focusing mostly on the reticle usability at minimum power, FOV, and ease of quickly acquiring a sight picture, and mentally comparing to my 3-18 (MSR2). I wasn’t paying much attention to resolution or contrast. I remember thinking that his NX8 would be better suited for a rifle that sees more hunting and my T6Xi would be more advantageous for range use. But I would be happy with either and would enjoy a half pound weight loss with the NX8.
 
#119
Guns&WhiteWater said:
Will I didn’t have them side by side, but I was not unimpressed with my friends 2.5-20, as I was expecting to be. I really liked it. I was focusing mostly on the reticle usability at minimum power, FOV, and ease of quickly acquiring a sight picture, and mentally comparing to my 3-18 (MSR2). I wasn’t paying much attention to resolution or contrast. I remember thinking that his NX8 would be better suited for a rifle that sees more hunting and my T6Xi would be more advantageous for range use. But I would be happy with either and would enjoy a half pound weight loss with the NX8.
Click to expand...
Yeah the NX8 2.5-20 I've been behind was not bad at all not like initial impressions led me to believe and recent impressions are that it’s very good. I’m going to put the T6Xi up in the PX as soon as it gets back cause it’s new should be an easy return. Pick up a 2.5-20 just to try and somewhat keep the LM8 from being a pig
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guns&WhiteWater
#120
5RWill said:
Yeah the NX8 2.5-20 I've been behind was not bad at all not like initial impressions led me to believe and recent impressions are that it’s very good. I’m going to put the T6Xi up in the PX as soon as it gets back cause it’s new should be an easy return. Pick up a 2.5-20 just to try and somewhat keep the LM8 from being a pig
Click to expand...
Just make sure the NX8 is a newer model, how much newer I do not know but I am fairly convinced the first release 2.5-20's had some serious optical issues that have since been addressed, that said, NF has a good warranty and if you think yours is "bad" then sent it in and tell them IQ sucks...
 
  • Like
Reactions: WILLSMITH030382
#121
Glassaholic said:
Just make sure the NX8 is a newer model, how much newer I do not know but I am fairly convinced the first release 2.5-20's had some serious optical issues that have since been addressed, that said, NF has a good warranty and if you think yours is "bad" then sent it in and tell them IQ sucks...
Click to expand...
Hopefully that’s not the case. Idk how to tell if it’s a newer model thoughb
 
#122
5RWill said:
Hopefully that’s not the case. Idk how to tell if it’s a newer model thoughb
Click to expand...
Ask when it was purchased. Beyond that, you'll tell almost immediately after properly adjusting the diopter, the parallax will be extremely finicky and the edge distortion at about 60% out of center will be significant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WILLSMITH030382
#123
I finally got around to mounting up my 4x32 NX8 and I have been very impressed so far. I think the current batches are looking really good. This thing does not present like an 8x erector at all.

PXL_20240705_123920814.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devildog0848, carbonbased, nrspence and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Glassaholic
Rifle Scopes Nightforce NX8 2.5-20x50 vs March 3-24x52 vs Schmidt 3-27x56 - battle of midrange magnification juggernauts
Replies
32
Views
7K
Glassaholic
Glassaholic
Glassaholic
Rifle Scopes March FFP 1.5-15x42 MPVO Review and Comparison (w/ Nightforce and Athlon)
Replies
246
Views
21K
OlivierFR
O
gr8fuldoug
Steiner T6Xi Riflescope Promotion
Replies
0
Views
518
gr8fuldoug
gr8fuldoug
gr8fuldoug
Optics Steiner T6Xi Riflescope Promotion
Replies
0
Views
409
gr8fuldoug
gr8fuldoug
Coejro
SOLD Scopes! (Leupold, NF, S&B)
Replies
5
Views
937
Coejro
Coejro
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts