Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Say what You will about the left. They are not stupid!! This is strategic and I dare say brilliant.
Sirhr
Ninety percent are dumb as rocks...or should I say sheep.
That's absolutely my stance. Sounds like in long game, it's a problem that will solve itselfI am confused…
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
Degenerate democrats aren’t born, they are made. Leftists could be allowed all the abortions they could ever want and the public fool system would easily make up for those numbers lost by Moloch’s child sacrifice clinics.I am confused…
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
Yea, we’re not pro life because of some eugenics theory of voting. We’re pro life because the human being growing in a woman’s uterus is a he or a she, and ought to be a legal person in fact. Every atrocity in human history starts with a leftist getting away with un-personing someone. If you draw a bright line at “human being” you don’t have that problem.I am confused…
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
If they ran a leopard slug against Trump, the Left would support it with as much enthusiasm.No, Dominion software and mail in ballots will.
because (presumably) the person's pro-life or anti-abortion stance is based upon religious or moral principles - that killing any child is wrong.I am confused…
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
even worse than that...Killing your child is probably the most wicked thing.
Doesn't even slow these MFers down, my body, my choice, my, my, my.
Has anyone seen Sharon?even worse than that...
some are getting pregnant on purpose, just so they can kill the child.
abortion is no longer a difficult solution to a terrible mistake, it is something they take joy in doing.
#empowerwomen
That's absolutely disturbing - for fun? Take joy??? Unreal. Start looking at Homo Sapien long enough and one wonders...how long will they survive?even worse than that...
some are getting pregnant on purpose, just so they can kill the child.
abortion is no longer a difficult solution to a terrible mistake, it is something they take joy in doing.
#empowerwomen
are we saying that we have fewer registered voters than they do?
I stopped caring about the abortion issue when I looked at the demographics. It's not my family. Not my clan. Not my people. There is no moral high ground for me to do anything about it. It's not my business what disgusting practices people want to partake in.
All the outrage and effort spent on it is misplaced when there are far and away vastly more critical issues.
i wouldn't make it illegal if it was up to me, but i wouldn't call it "healthcare" and force others to pay for them via taxes.100%
This is bullshit to cover the next steal.Within the margin of error for polling/statistics, by most sources, it's dead even.
i wouldn't make it illegal if it was up to me, but i wouldn't call it "healthcare" and force others to pay for them via taxes.
/my opinion is not constrained by religion.
This is bullshit to cover the next steal.
Yeah if you think j the last one was legit youre retarded.prove it or stop yer babblin bitchin
Yeah if you think j the last one was legit youre retarded.
More votes than obama and his rally’s couldn’t fill a McDonald’s.
Like I’ve always said, conservatives/republicans/libertarians need to learn how to cheat better and smarter.
The “FM & TM” that was written long ago says exactly what is to be done to those that do that shit.Killing your child is probably the most wicked thing.
Doesn't even slow these MFers down, my body, my choice, my, my, my.
That’s the dirty little secret behind planned parenthood, except they applied it to a race.That's absolutely my stance. Sounds like in long game, it's a problem that will solve itself
Easiest way to lose is to give up. A journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step. CLeaning up 10,000 tons of shit, starts with a willingness to shovel.Even if Trump wins despite the fraud, I don't think he can clean out the massive corruption.
That’s the dirty little secret behind planned parenthood, except they applied it to a race.
And President Johnson, a democrat, gave the deterioration of society with the ironically named "Great Society) an express lane to get us to this hellscape.I miss the days when a couple could have a dozen or two kids to do whatever they want with them and the only government involvement was a census every 10 or so years.
It's amazing how much things can deteriorate in only a couple generations.
Cheney is still alive?
Yes but his hunting partner is not.Cheney is still alive?
Why do you even care? It's their decision, not yours
This will bring out the brainwashed “I want to kill my baby” women out in droves and they will all gleefully vote to for genocide and socialism. 10 states are going to have massive turnout for fetus killing… and will ignore the economy and civil liberties and corruption and inflation and WW3. For the chimera of “my body my choice.”
A mantra that they all forgot when being told “take the vaxx” when they went full SS on the rest of the population over forced medical experimentation. (That, ironically, has probably sterilized hundreds of thousands of Karens and is killing more people every day.)
Say what You will about the left. They are not stupid!! This is strategic and I dare say brilliant.
Sirhr
I honestly thought he was dead. Must have confused him with someone else. Did he shoot another hunting partner? Or the previous one a second time?
And just who are you to tell anyone what to do? I mean, the .gov would be happy to tell you what you should or shouldn't do. Or you can fawk off and just let everyone make their own decisions without you butting in.Yep I predict this “win to lose” on Roe v Wade. We saw this in Colorado with weed on the ballot.
As a result of so called wins on abortion :
I applaud the calculated and long term vision that led to stacking the court to overturn Roe v. Wade. It really was a masterclass….save for the post victory unintended consequences.
- More crime
- More Democrats birth more democrats
- More children in abject poverty
- More brutal child abuse
- More welfare
- Increasingly stressed health care system
- Gun rights diminished to unthinkable levels
- Less Republicans
- Property rights diminished and removed
- More Democrat wins
- Much higher taxes
- One party rule
- Democrat controlled SCOTUS
- Codification of right to abortion into federal law
- Massive increase in abortions
But hey, the religious zealots tell us that Christ is coming to save us and everything supposed to go to shit anyways so the faster they make it go to shit the better. So I guess this is all just part of their plan.
I’m a Christian but I don’t subscribe to that fallacy. I believe we were given free will to act in a responsible manner. To guide society not with recklessness but instead to win long term. This is just another Afghanistan.
I believe a longer term more nuanced approach could’ve gotten us where we needed to be without throwing in the towel. Since this has been thrown back to the states, we’ve already lost in the blue states on this issue to the point where it’s increasing in abortions.
A good many of the Americans who arevoting for these state laws now, support certain limitations on abortion. I think we could’ve started there and rolled things back to where at least for a time they were safe, legal, and RARE. Practically speaking, I think rare was the best we ever could’ve hoped for, and I think that goal would’ve been attainable without the long-term losses that we’re going to see from overturning Roe v. Wade.
so you can define the difference between a woman and a man too. I mean, seems simple for you. And lets not forget to define exactly when it becomes a person. Give me that time lime.Yea, we’re not pro life because of some eugenics theory of voting. We’re pro life because the human being growing in a woman’s uterus is a he or a she, and ought to be a legal person in fact. Every atrocity in human history starts with a leftist getting away with un-personing someone. If you draw a bright line at “human being” you don’t have that problem.
And just who are you to tell anyone what to do? I mean, the .gov would be happy to tell you what you should or shouldn't do. Or you can fawk off and just let everyone make their own decisions without you butting in.
So, what’s your angle here? I mean, you’ve never heard of chromosomes? You’re unfamiliar with the two very different sets of reproductive organs, and the requisite hormonal differences? Yea, pretty fucking easy if believe we live in a single reality that we all share. Clearly you don’t so it must not be really simple for you. Most truths are simple. It’s the lies that have to get ever more complex.so you can define the difference between a woman and a man too. I mean, seems simple for you. And lets not forget to define exactly when it becomes a person. Give me that time lime.
Reading your bullshit in two different threads in the same evening was more than enough to make me hope that someone violently ass rapes you with a cactus. If you ever find yourself around Ardmore, let me know. I may be able to fit you into a nice 55gal drum.so you can define the difference between a woman and a man too. I mean, seems simple for you. And lets not forget to define exactly when it becomes a person. Give me that time lime.
feel free to send me an address, I get down there often. If you actually had an opinion, Id be a little more sympathetic, but you seem to eschew the same bullshit that others opine. Just let people do whatever and stop worrying about them and worry about yourself.Reading your bullshit in two different threads in the same evening was more than enough to make me hope that someone violently ass rapes you with a cactus. If you ever find yourself around Ardmore, let me know. I may be able to fit you into a nice 55gal drum.
Im not missing the point. The point is that someone wants to put their definition of what is or what isn't on everyone. Let people be. Thats what do whatever the fuck you want to means.I think you are missing the point…
Personally, I am pro “do whatever the fuck you want.” It’s not my business.
The point of the post is that by loading up the ballots during the 2024 election with single-issue abortion measures… the left wil lure out droves of women who are going to be voting on this… And mindlessly voting for left candidates while they are at it!
I think the issue should be left to states. And if all 50 states want to let women kill their babies, well fine with me.
Merely noting that by putting the issue on the ballot in November, millions of lefty women who would vote for Stalin, Pol Pot or Eichman if they guaranteed the “sanctity of their bodies” will be voting for Kamel Toe after being told Orange Man will force them to be Stepford Wives ( not making that up.)
All while ignoring the fact that the same Karens screamed to jail, encamp or execute people who didn’t take a gummint mandated vaxx. Whose bodies whose choice?
It’s a strategy that interests me… not what the outcome on fetus-killing is. For all I care, kill all your babies if you want to. Especially the one I have to sit next to on planes
Sirhr
Im not missing the point. The point is that someone wants to put their definition of what is or what isn't on everyone. Let people be. Thats what do whatever the fuck you want to means.
Abortion access or not, for hoes, is absolutely inconsequential in the context of who runs the US. But, most women and many men are stupid and short sighted about “personal rights to kill” a human that cannot yet live on its own. This quandary is like asking a dog whether they want more snacks, and using that decision to choose strategic business goals.Im not missing the point. The point is that someone wants to put their definition of what is or what isn't on everyone. Let people be. Thats what do whatever the fuck you want to means.
Postmodern solipsism masquerading as libertarianism.Im not missing the point. The point is that someone wants to put their definition of what is or what isn't on everyone. Let people be. Thats what do whatever the fuck you want to means.
Said it better than I could.Postmodern solipsism masquerading as libertarianism.
Yes, there need to be restrictions on killing another human being. Un-personing should have scorn heaped upon it, or violently resisted if people are stupid enough to codify it into law.
I answered your “questions” before you asked them. So educate us. On who qualifies for rights and under what circumstances? I can’t wait to hear.