-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
This is what will get Harris elected
- Thread starter sirhrmechanic
- Start date
Ninety percent are dumb as rocks...or should I say sheep.
Just as Marx intended….
“Four legs good two legs better,” was supposed to be a warning not a recipe!
Sirhr
I am confused…
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
If one is anti-Democrat, why do you want them to not have the ability to have abortions?
Seems to me if one is anti-Democrat you would want said Democrats to have as many abortions as possible in the hopes that the Pro-Lifers someday outnumber them.
“Pro-Life for Pro-Lifers” sounds like a possible tee-shirt idea.
-Stan
That's absolutely my stance. Sounds like in long game, it's a problem that will solve itself
Degenerate democrats aren’t born, they are made. Leftists could be allowed all the abortions they could ever want and the public fool system would easily make up for those numbers lost by Moloch’s child sacrifice clinics.
And besides, the reeee that comes out of those shitstains when they their child sacrifice rituals are put at risk is music to my ears.
Yea, we’re not pro life because of some eugenics theory of voting. We’re pro life because the human being growing in a woman’s uterus is a he or a she, and ought to be a legal person in fact. Every atrocity in human history starts with a leftist getting away with un-personing someone. If you draw a bright line at “human being” you don’t have that problem.
If they ran a leopard slug against Trump, the Left would support it with as much enthusiasm.
Last edited:
because (presumably) the person's pro-life or anti-abortion stance is based upon religious or moral principles - that killing any child is wrong.
abortion isn't a political argument, which is why we have both pro-life and pro-choice people in both parties.
Killing your child is probably the most wicked thing.
Doesn't even slow these MFers down, my body, my choice, my, my, my.
Doesn't even slow these MFers down, my body, my choice, my, my, my.
Well, we do have sovereignty over our own bodies, and I would never presume to make a medical decision for anyone. The only way to get from there to it’s ok to murder children is to un-person them, and pretend it’s just a medical procedure and that the person doesn’t exist, but it’s kind of useless to argue reality with people who think a man can be a woman by declaring it.
even worse than that...
some are getting pregnant on purpose, just so they can kill the child.
abortion is no longer a difficult solution to a terrible mistake, it is something they take joy in doing.
#empowerwomen
False
This is how they will “win” again
Helps when retarded red districts release counts on time. Let’s the blue Borg make just enough ballots to win by a “slim margin”
Has anyone seen Sharon?
She told me she had an abortion.
Bummer, I hope everythings ok. I didn't know she was pregnant.
She didn't either.
Have her call me. We need go party.
That's absolutely disturbing - for fun? Take joy??? Unreal. Start looking at Homo Sapien long enough and one wonders...how long will they survive?
I still use the argument...somebody murders pregnant woman and baby dies...they get TWO murder charges...just how is abortion different? I want want of these pro abortion at any stage people to explain that to me.
"Yes, but what you need is actual, hard evidence."
There was a time when that disgusting scumbag would have been drug out into the street, flogged severely and hung. There's your proof hanging in that tree.
Not doing so now is whats wrong with this country.
Instead, that will be the same look on the those people's faces as when they're in the cattle cars.
Last edited:
Within the margin of error for polling/statistics, by most sources, it's dead even.
Do not discount the number of registered "conservative" voters who believe abortion should be a legal choice.
i wouldn't make it illegal if it was up to me, but i wouldn't call it "healthcare" and force others to pay for them via taxes.
/my opinion is not constrained by religion.
This is bullshit to cover the next steal.
Grocery’s gas interest rates. NFW many people are voting die that slave owning ho
100%
to @Charmingmander 's point, given the current field of candidates and the issues at stake neither pro or anti abortion register on the scale for me at all
Yeah if you think j the last one was legit youre retarded.
More votes than obama and his rally’s couldn’t fill a McDonald’s.
what a maroon ...
trying to equate the number of votes to the number of eligible voters is like trying to say one farmer has more chickens than another farmer based solely on the number of eggs he sells at market
a 1-ply thinker at best
Like I’ve always said, conservatives/republicans/libertarians need to learn how to cheat better and smarter.
I do NOT want to live in these subhuman leftist degenerate’s new world order.
Last edited:
The “FM & TM” that was written long ago says exactly what is to be done to those that do that shit.
Clearly several paid shills on this website. Nobody is that retarded.
Those same polls, after factoring in fraud, had Hillary winning 2016 easily. They tripled the fraud in 2020 and it was exposed.
Those same polls, after factoring in fraud, had Hillary winning 2016 easily. They tripled the fraud in 2020 and it was exposed.
That’s the dirty little secret behind planned parenthood, except they applied it to a race.
Easiest way to lose is to give up. A journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step. CLeaning up 10,000 tons of shit, starts with a willingness to shovel.
heh I love quoting Mao in the bear pit. Unironically even.
I miss the days when a couple could have a dozen or two kids to do whatever they want with them and the only government involvement was a census every 10 or so years.
It's amazing how much things can deteriorate in only a couple generations.
And President Johnson, a democrat, gave the deterioration of society with the ironically named "Great Society) an express lane to get us to this hellscape.
Anyone here who has not read "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" by Thomas Sowell needs to read that. His words are the solution.
I honestly thought he was dead. Must have confused him with someone else. Did he shoot another hunting partner? Or the previous one a second time?
And just who are you to tell anyone what to do? I mean, the .gov would be happy to tell you what you should or shouldn't do. Or you can fawk off and just let everyone make their own decisions without you butting in.
I think you are missing the point…
Personally, I am pro “do whatever the fuck you want.” It’s not my business.
The point of the post is that by loading up the ballots during the 2024 election with single-issue abortion measures… the left wil lure out droves of women who are going to be voting on this… And mindlessly voting for left candidates while they are at it!
I think the issue should be left to states. And if all 50 states want to let women kill their babies, well fine with me.
Merely noting that by putting the issue on the ballot in November, millions of lefty women who would vote for Stalin, Pol Pot or Eichman if they guaranteed the “sanctity of their bodies” will be voting for Kamel Toe after being told Orange Man will force them to be Stepford Wives ( not making that up.)
All while ignoring the fact that the same Karens screamed to jail, encamp or execute people who didn’t take a gummint mandated vaxx. Whose bodies whose choice?
It’s a strategy that interests me… not what the outcome on fetus-killing is. For all I care, kill all your babies if you want to. Especially the one I have to sit next to on planes
Sirhr
So, what’s your angle here? I mean, you’ve never heard of chromosomes? You’re unfamiliar with the two very different sets of reproductive organs, and the requisite hormonal differences? Yea, pretty fucking easy if believe we live in a single reality that we all share. Clearly you don’t so it must not be really simple for you. Most truths are simple. It’s the lies that have to get ever more complex.
You should first learn to read, and actually comprehend my clear sentences before you try to play in the retard playground of personhood with the rest of the retards and communists.
I said a human being deserves personhood by virtue of what he or she is, and for no other reason, because that’s where we can prove it scientifically, and that is the only bright line where it isn’t the fucking opinion of someone who thinks they’re smarter than everyone else.
If not all human beings deserve rights, which is what I say, simply, because that’s the only point I can prove that HE or SHE IS in fact, and indisputably a human being, then it isn’t upon me to defend the statement that all human beings deserve rights. It’s on you to educate all us simpletons on why that’s a false statement, and why your OPINION of at what stage or under what circumstances any human being is worthy of rights and why that opinion trumps our shared reality and accumulated science.
Honestly, I take your comments as some sort of hostile invitation to argue with you, because you don’t like the idea that all human beings ought to have rights, but I stated it very clearly. So if you don’t like my simple maxim and think it’s really complex then it’s incumbent on you to actually make a different argument, justify your personal criteria for when a human being deserves rights, or at a minimum attack my premise as false or incorrect in some manner.
Hell, attack the science if you want, but it’s not like any of it is new or revolutionary. Probably the biggest thing recently that science and technology has done in terms of abortion is now the imaging is so good you can see the face of the fetus and how much it resembles the parents very early on…or do you still buy that he or she is “a clump of cells”?
Reading your bullshit in two different threads in the same evening was more than enough to make me hope that someone violently ass rapes you with a cactus. If you ever find yourself around Ardmore, let me know. I may be able to fit you into a nice 55gal drum.
feel free to send me an address, I get down there often. If you actually had an opinion, Id be a little more sympathetic, but you seem to eschew the same bullshit that others opine. Just let people do whatever and stop worrying about them and worry about yourself.
Last edited:
Im not missing the point. The point is that someone wants to put their definition of what is or what isn't on everyone. Let people be. Thats what do whatever the fuck you want to means.
Again… I said it was smart, not illegal or anything else. Observation in this case, not criticism. In fact, I think I called it a smart strategy on their part.
Just because I despise commies doesn’t mean I can’t note they their methods have some real genius behind them.
Oh and… have a Snickers or two! It’s the weekend!
Sirhr
Abortion access or not, for hoes, is absolutely inconsequential in the context of who runs the US. But, most women and many men are stupid and short sighted about “personal rights to kill” a human that cannot yet live on its own. This quandary is like asking a dog whether they want more snacks, and using that decision to choose strategic business goals.
Postmodern solipsism masquerading as libertarianism.
Yes, there need to be restrictions on killing another human being. Un-personing should have scorn heaped upon it, or violently resisted if people are stupid enough to codify it into law.
I answered your “questions” before you asked them. So educate us. On who qualifies for rights and under what circumstances? I can’t wait to hear.