That is true. You're either dealing with THE truth or you're not. To get technical, "At conception" is inaccurate and the just fertilized egg is not a human being (although provably "alive"). A zygote does not become a human being, at the earliest stage of development, till differentiation and the formation of a complete strand of DNA, then is provably a unique in all the universe human being at the earliest stage of development.
The whole point of going round and round with the post modernist is to demonstrate that in this reality this is the only place you can draw the line that isn't opinion, subjective, and downright random that doesn't have far reaching consequences over all areas of human endeavor. Just by setting the precedent alone. Differentiation is the only place where you can honestly and truthfully even utter the words "human rights", or "human being".
Before that it really is just specific cells in a person's body over which they ought to legally have 100% sovereignty and autonomy. No question, and upon this we agree, but maybe only up to a point when it comes to things like suicide where it ethically does get murky if for no other reason than how it effects everything else.
So you have no problem telling people what to do with their bodies? Got it. Because while it's in that woman's body, that clump of cells has no choice but to accept it. Or the 14 year old rape victim? She's gonna be charged with murder? No clear cut answers? How about let everyone make their own choice? It isn't for you to tell anyone what they can or can't do. While you think it's immoral, it's not illegal. People like you are the reason abortion clinics get bombed. You can't just get over the fact that people have differing opinions.
A. If there is a miscarriage or chemical abortion when that human being is “a clump of cells” I do still think it’s immoral, but I’m fine with it being legal. There is no conceivable reason for a rape victim to allow the baby to mature and then to murder him/her if she wants to kill it. She can take the Morning After pill and prevent implantation. Yes, still a human being, and still wrong, but again I don’t believe it should be illegal. This also solves most of the other red herrings you offer. Or, are you suggesting that a rape victim might not realize they are pregnant?
B. Yes, there are situations where I don’t have a good answer. Perhaps there isn’t a good answer in some cases and we are left to choose between evils, which I agree is where legality can either fall short of go too far. There is no perfect law for every situation.
C. Quite frankly, 1000% more pregnancy centers get attacked than the very few abortion mills that have been bombed telling you something about your fellow travelers and mine. Google it.
I can get over the fact that people have different opinions. What I can't get over is you wanting to have your own facts that differ from those in our shared reality, and your willful ignoring of facts that contravene your predetermined opinion. You are only trying to complicate it by introducing a pregnancy that results from a crime, rightly so, but I'll concede that to you. I don't have simple and easy solutions to that other than to say that we are talking about 1% of 1% where there is a pregnancy that results from a crime, and the victim would be oblivious the the fact they might be pregnant so they carry the baby and then want to kill him/her. Making laws based on the rare exception is a terrible idea, and in fact the law can speak directly to rare exceptions.
Roe vs Wade was silent on everything, and the effect was allowing abortion till the moment of birth, but all of you death cultists act like it was the end of the world that it was finally struck down. This was always the most extreme and mind numbingly ignorant position, and it seems to be the one you still hold, yet you call me a religious fanatic. It's you who are the fanatic and refuse to look reality in the face.