-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Maggie’s Motivational Pic Thread v2.0 - - New Rules - See Post #1
- Thread starter Snake-Eyes
- Start date
-
- Tags
- motivational pictures
Hey, it's your business what you're doing with her but you could, at the very least, do her right by getting her bikini bottom back on the right way 'round.
Bikes in the road are annoying. That’s all there is to it….
The issue is, people don’t have the legal right to interfere with them while they’re on the road because that’s where they’re supposed to be. I’m pretty sure where I live, that person committed several particular crimes.
The first, of course, being that it doesn’t matter how you hit the person, you hit the person on a bike. Doesn’t matter if you’re right or wrong, now you got 12 points on your license, a suspended license for 1 to 5 years, and with the video, probably list of other charges.
…and, if you suffer from an attitude problem and don’t wait for the police, that’s a hit-and-run. Now you’re never seeing your drivers license again (5-10years).
All because you couldn’t play nice on the road…
It really doesn’t matter… Regardless of who’s at fault the SUV hit the person. At that point it no longer matters who you think is at fault from a criminal standpoint.
Yeah, in a civil court for a lawsuit that’s a different story… but criminally, most motor vehicle laws in most states: The vehicle is at fault.
I always deal with bikers as though they’ve 6 years old. Yeah, they’re going to pull shit that an adult would know better. And a little scratch on my truck ain’t the equivalent to a closed head brain injury.
So if I pay for a licence, registration, insurance etc I am automatically at fault??
The guy who pays nothing automatically wins???
I didn't say it fair; Most states if you hit a pedestrian or a bike, you're screwed. Regardless of the circumstances.
My old man hit an old lady crossing the street in the middle of the night, wearing black, and killed her.
The law makes him at fault regardless... instant 10 points and there is no appealing it.
There were no road lights, he was coming around the corner while doing the speed limit. she was DRT. He's at fault legally.
In NY a bicyclist is considered a vehicle and is subject to the same traffic laws, something that most of the spandex wearing
assholes cant seem to comprehend.
I
I’ve been waiting for a Garage Door Opener Savant to identify the make, model and vintage of the opener. This site has a subject matter expert on everything.They didn't make that Craftsman 6200 garage door opener until 2001.
He made some poor choices out of hubris.
According to every level of collision investigation across the US....
Criminal proceedings against anyone involved in a vehicular collision go off of the "primary collision factor" or PCF. There could be multiple things that went wrong in a collision, but there's 1 involved party which did the *one thing* which, if not done, would have avoided the collision.
In this dick face bicyclists case... yes, the vehicle was crowding the bicycle father to the right, not cool, I get it...
.... then the bicyclist's inner 5 year-old came out and he drifted left (likely purposely) in front of that 5000-6000 pound vehicle way too close (potentially unsafe lane change and without proper signal). Then BikeDick (purposely?) slowed down to clearly an unsafe-for-given-conditions speed on a green light, causing the vehicle he cut off just a couple seconds earlier, to not have enough time or space to see/react to...thus the bicyclist is likely at fault based on my view of the incident.
Would a prosecutor bring charges if he was a most likely cause of his own demise? Doubt it, but crazier things have happened.
Last edited:
I'm not arguing. You're correct. The big issue ends up being how most State's laws are structured. Especially in the Northeast where I grew up... Many of States, most, if a car hits a bicyclist... or, especially, a pedestrian, they get at least one ticket and it's got all of your points.
Last edited:
Also if there's a vehicle left of suv cyclist is pushing driver into the other lane possibly causing more issues
The bicyclist should be charged with Darwinism in the second degree.
That's likely a thing given the traffic conditions, but we can't see it on the video.
Rules:
Based basilica in Poland
That's a 1/2 ton.1972 GMC K2500
And yes that's on my property, driveway through the woods then the dick tree as you get to my house.
Bourbon and chainsaws
Word to the wise though. I made that up.
Beautiful but a century or two to build and thousands of lives lost building it.That's likely a thing given the traffic conditions, but we can't see it on the video.
Rules:
Based basilica in Poland
View attachment 8522655
Having spent 30 years doing nothing but deal with accidents, accident reconstruction, collision theory, advanced vehicle systems and tort law, I have never heard the phrase “primary collision factor” or PCF. The term used in the industry is “proximate cause”. The “one thing” you mention is the “doctrine of last clear chance”, in other words who had the last clear opportunity to avoid the collision. Many people mix criminal intent or action with civil liability. Many law enforcement officer have no clue what happened and base their reports or citations on what people say rather than physical evidence and people will lie when the truth will help them. I would think in cases where a full on accident reconstruction was done 50% of the police reports were completely or partially inaccurate. As police departments are groomed through political hiring practices this is trending towards many more inaccurate police reports.
Brains, tits, ass, and a God given vagina.
I see nothing wrong here, driver used proper procedure for pest eradication.
