Even ehwn they have the majority they just cant stick together. Collins,Murtawski .Tillis and the one from Indiana already squawking about Trumps picks. The Dems would approve Satan himself if they had the chance.
-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Republicans just suck
- Thread starter mvphilly
- Start date
That's because they're not truly conservative, they are RINOs. Like McConnell, John Cornyn, even Dan Crenshaw and the list goes on and on.
Thats why, for the most part, Dems usually win. They circle the wagons, Reps eat their own.
Yes. Democrats don't blink at eye if one of their leaders fucks a baby during a hearing, they honestly do not.
Republicans will absolutely shit on Trump for the next two years, then lose both the house and senate and return to being the political party led by fucking cucks.
Riots are coming and we will have no fucking leadership other than Trump and Vance.
Republicans will absolutely shit on Trump for the next two years, then lose both the house and senate and return to being the political party led by fucking cucks.
Riots are coming and we will have no fucking leadership other than Trump and Vance.
The real question here is… just how wide can the OP’s mouth open for a cock?
While i might doubt repubs questioning Trump's picks, remember his picks from last time. Even Trump said he picked wrongly in some cases, relying upon the advice of others.
That is why I don't mind him picking non-politicians to cabinet positions. They have not spent a career having their party members film them having sex with kids to keep them in line.
That is why I don't mind him picking non-politicians to cabinet positions. They have not spent a career having their party members film them having sex with kids to keep them in line.
Last edited:
The problem is that they are “conservative”.
The true conservatives Just vote no to everything. ..going to build the wall, it’s costs a penny..vote no. They are the ones who stonewall anything that might push the ball forward.
The ones you mentioned are just weak people who try to stay in the middle to keep their job..first job of a politician it to keep their job. Then they govern
I’ve actually never made a whore moan because I’ve never had to pay for sex. Must suck to be a needle dick fuck.
You're not paying them for sex, you're paying them to leave.
No such thing as free pussy
Its almost like the system is rigged to check every decision to make sure the balance of power doesn't shift about too much....
almost.
almost.
Said every loser trying to justify it. I’ve banged many chicks I just met and never payed for more than a plan B and made sure they swallowed it.
Also just checking: If I don't like one of trumps picks, does that make me a libertard? Which one do I have permission to disapprove of? Just one, or how about two? Three? Where's the limit?
Sounding like an echo chamber around here: It might be possible to have a bad choice (*cough* Harriet Miers *cough*).
Remember 99% agreement is not enough!! You must agree with the group 100% or be ostracized as a liberal scum!
Sounding like an echo chamber around here: It might be possible to have a bad choice (*cough* Harriet Miers *cough*).
Remember 99% agreement is not enough!! You must agree with the group 100% or be ostracized as a liberal scum!
Pretty much what I was saying before. I think it is okay for some to question Trump's picks. Even Trump said on the JRE podcast that he made some choices in error.
Not that he will be perfect. No one is. But if I were Trump, I would go ahead and troll and give name for Director of the FBI and get Wray to packing his box of stuff from the office.
Cornyn is an absolute turncoat disappointment here in Texas, liberals have to be voting for him in the primary, because I don't know anyone who votes for him willingly in the general election.
I will have to ask your husband after you give him the rusty trombone treatment.Maybe after he will take the training wheels off your scooter so you can jump the speed bumps in the parking lot of your trailer park. You shouldn't be such a hostile gay it's no ones fault but your own and that uncle of yours who still plays with your dirty spot.
The 17th amendment needs repealed. Before the 17th, senators could be recalled at will by the governor and/or the people of the state.
Truthfully term limits fix most of it.
Senators can get 3 so 18 years total and house 2 so 8 years total
I think there is a benefit to have someone “almost” like pelosi on each side who when she makes a phone call stuff happens. Kind of keep status quo and limits the crazy swings every few years.
But there should be a new batch of people every 8-10 years.
They just get too far removed from reality being in there so long. Can’t blame them as it’s a cocoon but that’s the problem..it’s a cocoon.
Would also make them make decisions because they would all need a job or fun for higher office.so in theory it would put a fire under them to choose or stagnate. Both are beneficial to the country. You can’t stop wall for 4/5 terms and be a roadblock etc
I disagree.
Term limits only means they will be thinking about being re-elected less times but from the first time in, that's where they all spend most of their energy...getting re-elected rather than representing their constituents. In the case of the senate, if they were appointed by the governor of the state (as the COTUS originally intended), they would not have to worry about being re-elected and simply due to the elections of governors, you are almost guaranteed to not have senate lifers.
I do agree with term limits though. Right straight across the board for all elected positions. If it's good enough for the executive office, it should be plenty good enough for the legislators. 2 elected terms max.
Then there is the SCOTUS and that stupid lifetime appointment. While I agree that the Judicial should be politically insulated, they are not. In fact, they continuously show they are politically ACTIVE rather than objective. So...term limits should apply to them, too. Maybe a 20 year max.
Hey that's the glory hound with 900 other threadsIn before someone mentions the other 900 threads and how you are a glory hound
There a reason both sides used the treasonous scumbags of the federal agencies to squash the Tea Party
FIFY. Problem would sort itself out pretty quickly.
Oh...
I have posted a list of repeals to include 16, 17, 19, amend 25, make a new one that requires members of congress to obey (pay?) any and all new laws retroactive to their date of election while the new rules won't take effect until the next fiscal year for WE THE PEOPLE. There's plenty more....like only property owners should be voting (original COTUS before all the extra additions).
Nah, the uni-party protects itself. Anyone that dissents more than 5% gets chewed up and shat out. Fuck everything about fed gov
Careful. Once a Constitutional Convention is called, all amendments are up for discussion.
Are we allowed to bring up secession too? Can us conservative/libertarian types claim like Montana, Wyoming, and one of the Dakotas? That’s all we really need
We don’t really need any Dakotas. Maybe some of Wyoming, Montana, Washington and Oregon. Or maybe just Greater Idaho with an ocean port and call it a day
We absolutely could use the grazing land and petroleum products
Really funny article today about Bill Maher saying Liberals lost because they are intolerant and if you don't agree with them, they throw you out.
Sounds familiar?
Clip: its on Fox (he=Bill Mahr)
Link:
www.foxnews.com
Like I said, almost like the system was designed to be frustrating.
Almost.
Sounds familiar?
Clip: its on Fox (he=Bill Mahr)
Link:
Bill Maher tries to explain to baffled William Shatner why Harris lost election
Actor William Shatner and HBO host Bill Maher debated why Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party's messaging failed to resonate with voters.
www.foxnews.com
Like I said, almost like the system was designed to be frustrating.
Almost.
Wyoming and Montana would have ample supply for that small region. Having spent 15 winters working in North Dakota...fuck that.
Time to Clean Senate: The RINOs Must Go — Here’s the List of Senators Up for Reelection in 2026 | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
The Senate GOP’s selection of John Thune as Majority Leader is yet another slap in the face to conservatives who demand leadership that reflects the will of the people, not the establishment swamp.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
I think the RINO list will be expanded within the first six months of the Trump administration.
After the vote on Wednesday, Amy Kremer posted this list of the Republican Senators who voted for Rick Scott (instead of John Cornyn or Thune):
- Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
- Ted Cruz (R-TX)
- Bill Hagerty (R-TN)
- Ron Johnson (R-WI)
- Mike Lee (R-UT)
- Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
- Rand Paul (R-KY)
- Marco Rubio (R-FL)
- Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
- Rick Scott (R-FL)
- Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
- Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)
- JD Vance (R-OH)
Partial Senator RINO list:The Hill reported that these 9 senators are most likely to obstruct Trump’s cabinet appointments:
- Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
- Joni Ernst (R-IA)
- Todd Young (R-IN)
- Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
- Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
- Susan Collins (R-ME)
- Thom Tillis (R-NC)
- John Cornyn (R-TX)
- John Curtis (R-UT)
Last edited:
i guess if all 49 dems show up to vote, it doesn't matter because they are still the majority for now.
I realize there isn’t a fucking thing that’ll ever happen that most of you will not bitch about…
Similar threads
