Night Vision Eotech clipir mk2 elr vs VoodooM

I can't help answer your question but if you end up making a switch hmu about the MK2.

Did you buy the eotech from Dan @DownRangeThermal ? If so he can answer this question for you. Dan knows his stuff.

I would really like to see the N-Vision clip on w/ AB in it. Yes, N-Vision, I mean you

The Voodoo M will have better sensitivity, definition, and PID, but if you are in open areas and without alot of background thermal signature the ELR does provide very good pixel density and will still likely work just fine for you.

I also personally think the BAE cores are superior and the premium is worth it. There is something magic about their contrast and 3-dimensional image that really works. For example I was on a recent trip and using 35 mm IR Hunter as a mobile spotter, and I was able to pick out and identify stuff that my friends were struggling with while using Pulsar and ATN stuff of similar resolution and objective size. It isnt a "night and day" difference but that extra 5-10% that is noticeable.

The ELR is perfectly serviceable though and will provide significant long range capability.

I have used both. I choose the M hands down, but I know people who feel differently. If you’re a BAE core kind of guy, you will definitely prefer the M.

As I’ve posted before, I’ve had conditions where animals didn’t show up at all with Eotech/Theon clip ons, where they showed up great with BAE thermals, and no, this was not a settings issue. This was in extreme cold, so I don’t know how that’s possible, but it was very disappointing.

Try the M.

You will detect better with the M due to the way the core smokes the competition. PID will theoretically be slightly harder due to the slight pixel density difference. I can’t make hits under actual field conditions at near the distance the M will PID a yote, so for me it’s irrelevant.