Side Mounted WMLRF

D

DogDown338

Private
Minuteman
May 4, 2020
12
17
#1
Hello everyone. Brand new to WMLRF,
I’m looking at the vortex and new tango wmlrf’s and am just curious why I don’t see them side mounted anywhere. I run a Seeking SP10M in 6.5 and Seekins told me the rail is rigid enough for it, also contacted vortex about zeroing the system from a side mount. They said it was no problem as long as the rail was stiff enough.

I love running a 12 oclock red dot over my optic (March 4.5-28). So in theory, if I zeroed the red dot at 100 yards and the wmlrf, i would never have to dial back to zero between shots before ranging. Could simply put my red dot on target and tap my range button. Am I missing something. Please educate me.
 
#3
How are you making sure that you're putting the 2 MOA dot with no magnification on the thing you want to get a range to? It seems like it wouldn't take much to dip off the edge or completely miss the object and get a false measurement.
 
#5
Trigger Monkey said:
How are you making sure that you're putting the 2 MOA dot with no magnification on the thing you want to get a range to? It seems like it wouldn't take much to dip off the edge or completely miss the object and get a false measurement.
Click to expand...
True. I suppose some sort of vulcan reticle red dot could tighten things up a little bit. Regardless, really curious of side mounted setups.
 
#6
Zak Smith said:
I use the Vortex side-mounted on several guns and it works great.
Click to expand...
I'll elaborate a little bit. I ran these on a pair of SPR-style gas guns for a class (we did shoot to about 850 so we actually had to range, LOL). Two reasons-- first, I like to have a small red dot above the scope at the 12'o'clock position, and two, with the Vortex on the left-hand side, I can keep a shooting position and just read the display with my left eye. With the Vortex on top of the scope, I have to raise my head off the gun to read it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xxflyingturtlexx, Simonsza1, earthquake and 1 other person
#7
Zak Smith said:
I'll elaborate a little bit. I ran these on a pair of SPR-style gas guns for a class (we did shoot to about 850 so we actually had to range, LOL). Two reasons-- first, I like to have a small red dot above the scope at the 12'o'clock position, and two, with the Vortex on the left-hand side, I can keep a shooting position and just read the display with my left eye. With the Vortex on top of the scope, I have to raise my head off the gun to read it.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly what I’m looking to do. Mount it left side as close to receiver as possible. And have a 12 oclock dot. Do you remember the handguards used or how you mounted it?
 
#9
DogDown338 said:
Hello everyone. Brand new to WMLRF,
I’m looking at the vortex and new tango wmlrf’s and am just curious why I don’t see them side mounted anywhere. I run a Seeking SP10M in 6.5 and Seekins told me the rail is rigid enough for it, also contacted vortex about zeroing the system from a side mount. They said it was no problem as long as the rail was stiff enough.

I love running a 12 oclock red dot over my optic (March 4.5-28). So in theory, if I zeroed the red dot at 100 yards and the wmlrf, i would never have to dial back to zero between shots before ranging. Could simply put my red dot on target and tap my range button. Am I missing something. Please educate me.
Click to expand...

I think the hardest part of what you want to do will be properly setting up the parallel zero with your Impact and red dot. Vortex include a target for zeroing the Impact but since you're using a non-magnified RDS you'll have to zero close enough that you can see the viz laser and the reticle of your red dot with the naked eye. Since it's a parallel zero you could do that super close but you'd want to verify at distance since any discrepancy in your side-to-side zero would make things funky at distance (ie you'd get the range of the things beside what you're aiming at).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogDown338
#10
Zak Smith said:
I'll elaborate a little bit. I ran these on a pair of SPR-style gas guns for a class (we did shoot to about 850 so we actually had to range, LOL). Two reasons-- first, I like to have a small red dot above the scope at the 12'o'clock position, and two, with the Vortex on the left-hand side, I can keep a shooting position and just read the display with my left eye. With the Vortex on top of the scope, I have to raise my head off the gun to read it.
Click to expand...
Hey Zak, what was it like to sling up for carrying with the WMLRF on the left hand side? That was always what I saw as the weak point in that setup, figured the rangefinder would catch on your gear.
 
#11
dgheriani said:
I think the hardest part of what you want to do will be properly setting up the parallel zero with your Impact and red dot. Vortex include a target for zeroing the Impact but since you're using a non-magnified RDS you'll have to zero close enough that you can see the viz laser and the reticle of your red dot with the naked eye. Since it's a parallel zero you could do that super close but you'd want to verify at distance since any discrepancy in your side-to-side zero would make things funky at distance (ie you'd get the range of the things beside what you're aiming at).
Click to expand...
Ah, well, you get a parallel/offset zero on the LRF using your scope reticle dialed back to 0, and then as a second step, you can co-zero your red dot to the scope optically.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgheriani
#14
I just measured the actual offset in inches vert. and horiz. and then did a true parallel zero, and then verified at distance. The primary was done around 40 yards and when I verified at distance it was dead on. Even if you get a co-witnessed (ie not parallel) zero at 1000, you won't have more than the absolute distance between the laser/sensor and scope center at the gun, at 2000 yards. The problem I had with using a far object to co-zero the LRF was that the visible laser on the Impact is pretty weak and seeing it at a distance was hard. You almost need a semi-reflective sheet to know when you're close, and then a very reflective small (e.g. 1") dot on that, at the exact linear up/down/left/right offset vs. the scope aiming point.

Using a red dot for aiming is a red herring and not really relevant to if the LRF is side or top mounted. For example, you can run a top-mounted LRF with a red dot at 9, 3, or 1:30 o'clock and the considerations for how you actually aim the LRF are the same. Or you can have a side-mounted LRF and not even have a red dot. They are separate topics. The biggest advantage of a side mouned LRF is the ability to read the screen without majorly disturbing the shooting positition.

Having a red dot on a gun set up with a "long range scope" is pretty useful, especially for gas guns (e.g. SPR/DMR) that might be employed faster or at a much shorter distance. Just from my experience with the setup, there are times when it was much easier to range using the red dot, and there were times when we had to aim with the scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xxflyingturtlexx, ggmanning, SkyScrapin and 1 other person
#15
Zak Smith said:
I just measured the actual offset in inches vert. and horiz. and then did a true parallel zero, and then verified at distance. The primary was done around 40 yards and when I verified at distance it was dead on. Even if you get a co-witnessed (ie not parallel) zero at 1000, you won't have more than the absolute distance between the laser/sensor and scope center at the gun, at 2000 yards. The problem I had with using a far object to co-zero the LRF was that the visible laser on the Impact is pretty weak and seeing it at a distance was hard. You almost need a semi-reflective sheet to know when you're close, and then a very reflective small (e.g. 1") dot on that, at the exact linear up/down/left/right offset vs. the scope aiming point.

Using a red dot for aiming is a red herring and not really relevant to if the LRF is side or top mounted. For example, you can run a top-mounted LRF with a red dot at 9, 3, or 1:30 o'clock and the considerations for how you actually aim the LRF are the same. Or you can have a side-mounted LRF and not even have a red dot. They are separate topics. The biggest advantage of a side mouned LRF is the ability to read the screen without majorly disturbing the shooting positition.

Having a red dot on a gun set up with a "long range scope" is pretty useful, especially for gas guns (e.g. SPR/DMR) that might be employed faster or at a much shorter distance. Just from my experience with the setup, there are times when it was much easier to range using the red dot, and there were times when we had to aim with the scope.
Click to expand...

Just curious on how you have your red dot setup so that it also works as an aiming device for your LRF? I run red dots on bolt guns and gas guns but don't zero them the same way. On bolt guns, I dial my 600yd dope onto my magnified optic and then "co-zero" the red dot to the center of the reticle while aimed at a target at 600ish yds. I've found that way whenever I put the red dot on a target or TRP between about 200-1200yds, I can drop behind the main optic and be on target. I never really thought to check and see if the red dot would be close enough to use as an aiming point for the LRF. On gas guns, I just zero the red dot for 50yds and learn my hold overs since I use it for quick engagements inside 100.
 
#16
Zak Smith said:
I just measured the actual offset in inches vert. and horiz. and then did a true parallel zero, and then verified at distance.
Click to expand...
This is the way. Place a reflective sticker on your target with the exact offset of the WMLRF to the scope center. Aim at 100 yards with your scope zeroed at 100 and adjust the RF until it lights up the reflective target. Tweak at distance if needed. Offset will be constant as far as you want to measure/shoot. Same way I set up my IR pointers. Set up anywhere really won't matter if you parallel the RF to the scope. The offset will be constant throught the range. No problem knowing the side mounted RF laser is always say 3" low and 2" left of your scope aiming point. Range everything at roughly 2:00.
 
Last edited:
#17
dgheriani said:
Just curious on how you have your red dot setup so that it also works as an aiming device for your LRF? I run red dots on bolt guns and gas guns but don't zero them the same way. On bolt guns, I dial my 600yd dope onto my magnified optic and then "co-zero" the red dot to the center of the reticle while aimed at a target at 600ish yds. I've found that way whenever I put the red dot on a target or TRP between about 200-1200yds, I can drop behind the main optic and be on target. I never really thought to check and see if the red dot would be close enough to use as an aiming point for the LRF. On gas guns, I just zero the red dot for 50yds and learn my hold overs since I use it for quick engagements inside 100.
Click to expand...
Hi,

It's been a while since I messed with those guns but I probably did this: dialed scope back to 100 (my "LRF offset co-zero"), aimed the gun (ie the scope crosshairs) at a definite/precise object at a distance, and then dialed the red dot zero to the same point . On the gun, this meant the red dot basically had a 100 yard zero for shooting.

This is also how I zero the red dot that is on my spotting scope, to its reticle center (aim at distant object and then dial red dot to match).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dgheriani
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
SOLD Vortex Impact 4000
Replies
1
Views
198
TexasGrinch
T
skyewalker
Precision Rifle Gear Tango Innovations FIRE4000 WMLRF Initial Impressions
Replies
74
Views
3K
carbonbased
carbonbased
S
This may be a dumb question, but hear me out?
Replies
20
Views
1K
Steel+Killer
S
D
Long Range Gas Gun Optics
Replies
55
Views
3K
owtlaw
O
F
Max range with 56mm scope on 20 moa rail + ?moa mount?
Replies
14
Views
443
FromMyColdDeadHand
F
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts