Unpopular opinion:
Marketed properly, I think this could very well attract the urban hunter that goes west and spends a few grand on a guided hunt.
He’s got money, but he doesn’t have the kind of money that the Gunwerks groupies have.
He doesn’t even know what hand loading is, much less does he do it.
He’s an AR guy who owns Geissele products because to him they are the equivalent of a Gucci bag to girls who follow Kardashian women.
Crazy?
I explained that.
Question: How would you feel right now if you didn’t eat breakfast?
.
Further, how does this apply to the topic at hand?
When discussing targeted demographics, some people have a difficult time taking themselves out of their own “person” and “being” that targeted demographic for a moment.
Other people are extremely gifted at this.
You get asked to explain any data, evidence, or even logic behind your assumptions about Geissele's target demographic for this product, and immediately change the subject.
There's definitely a point in here about how women act. A deflection often serves to mask a weak argument. If you had a clear, solid explanation, you would likely present it rather than redirect.
Insisting that others are biased or “too close” to their own preferences to judge the situation objectively. Meanwhile, you yourself never addressed your own assumptions or biases about a demographic.
"Ive already explained it" is classic circular reasoning as well, because you haven't actually explained anything.
By accusing everyone else of being biased and unable to separate themselves from their preferences, you also attempt to place yourself above scrutiny.
The entire exchange is hilarious because its entirely void of any coherent argument, no evidence supporting the assumptions, and a clear demonstration of the very bias you claim is everyone else’s problem.
My original question to you was what separates this product from something like Proof's bolt action.
Geissele may be the equivalent of a 'designer bag' for a certain urban demographic, but just like designer bags, there's multiple brands and multiple offerings that compete in this same category. Proor, Larue, Seekins, and even Sig Sauer all being amongst that relevant group of brands, with bolt action offerings.
You failing to have an answer to that question, doesn't suspend the validity of it.
Adding to that, your specific point about this being for customers of guided hunts. Most guides have recommended gear lists. Some even provide a rifle to their customers. What guide is going to risk their reputation by recommending a brand new caliber in a brand new platform?
Guides as a demographic skew towards what they believe to be proven platforms and calibers that have been withstood the test of time.
Nobody needs to be "gifted" at anything to understand that different groups of people buy different things for different reasons. The snipershide populous likely wont be buying this, since theres plenty of knowledge here about it competing with the cost of a proven semi-custom action, with your choice of barrel, to exact spec, built on whatever stock you want, but there's also zero evidence to support that the "geissele fanboy" crowd is rushing to spend 4k on a bolt action either, short of your opinionated post.