Berger 105 Hybrid Target VS Hornady 105 Aeromatch: PART 1 - Dimensional Consistency

barnesuser28

Team Herd Thinner
Full Member
Minuteman
Mar 24, 2013
115
67
Dickinson ND
After being so wildly impressed with the 105 Berger Hybrids in my 6 Dasher last competition season, and disappointed in the Hornady options I had tried, I was excited to see the Aeromatch line announced recently. This gives us a great opportunity to see if Berger has something special in their manufacturing consistency, or if it is their bullet shape/design that gives them their world renowned match performance.

I picked up a box of 500 105 grain Aeromatch from Sports South, lot number: 2241647 to compare to the lot of 105 Berger Hybrids I shot all of last season, lot number 3264.

In Part 1 I will be sharing my measurement results for the two different bullets. I did a sample size of 50 for each. For some added context I have been a machinist/machine shop owner for 8 years so I have a decent "feel" with metrology tools for when things feel right and best practices for consistent measurements. The weights were measured on a calibrated FX-120i digital balance with .02 grain resolution, the length and base to ogive measurements were done with a Mitutoyo 500-196-20 0-6" caliper with .0005" resolution, and diameter was measured with a Mitutoyo 293-185-30 0-1" Quantumike with .00005" resolution. I realize that the resolution would ideally be higher when measuring variances this small, but I do not yet have a keyence laser comparator so until then, this will have to do. Take the results with a grain of salt, on target is where it really matters.

In part 2 I will share groups with each bullet from this seasons virgin 6 Dasher barrel. I will be testing bullet jump at -.010", -.030", -.060", -.090", -.120". With 30 shot groups at each seating depth and each bullet, for a total of 300 rounds between both bullets and all tests.

I have added some graphs to display the data below, but in summary here are the results:

AEROMATCH 105
WEIGHT GRLENGTHBASE TO OGIVEDIAMETER
104.891.2725".6581".24313"AVERAGE
.14.0028".0004".00004"STANDARD DEVIATION
.52.014".0015".00015"EXTREME SPREAD

105 Hybrid Target
WEIGHT GRLENGTHBASE TO OGIVEDIAMETER
104.991.2700".6631".24333"AVERAGE
.03.0033".0007".00002"STANDARD DEVIATION
.16.0018".0025".00005"EXTREME SPREAD

A few notes I want to make:
  1. The Bergers have a much more brassy/yellow color to the jackets, which makes me believe the alloy they use likely has a lower copper content than the Hornady Aeromatch. This would leave me to believe the jackets on the Bergers are slightly harder
  2. The Bergers have a slightly domed bottom at the base of the boattail, which made the length measurements on the caliper slightly trickier than on the very flat bottomed Aeromatch, so that may have added a bit of variance to the Berger lengths as getting it perfectly perpendicular to the caliper jaws was tricky.
  3. The meplats on the Aeromatch look great, I give them a slight edge over the Bergers here.
  4. Both bullets had a slight taper to their diameters, with the boattail/bearing surface junction being the widest point. The Bergers had about .00015-.0002" of taper depending on where you measured, the Aeromatch were about .0001" or so. All measurements were taken at the boattail/bearing surface junction for both bullets.
  5. A few of the Bergers were about .0001" out of round, I didn't notice the same phenomenon on the Aeromatch.
My gunsmith should have the new Proof 6 Dasher barrel chambered by the new year, so I will throw some ammo together in the meantime and get to shooting as soon as the ND winter allows. I'm looking forward to sharing those results with you all.


105 TARGET BULLET WEIGHT VARIANCE IN GRAINS 105.00 REFERENCE.png
105 TARGET BULLET LENGTH VARIANCE 1.270_ REFERENCE.png
105 TARGET BULLET BASE TO OGIVE VARIANCE  .660_ REFERENCE.png
105 TARGET BULLET DIAMETER VARIANCE  .24300_ REFERENCE.png
 
Last edited:
Thanks for taking the plunge and collecting this data!

I'd put money on that level of diameter variance showing up in the velocity spread at a minimum on the Hornady.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LRRPF52
Great info... but it might make things a little bit more intuitive when people look at the graphics if the red line was Hornady, because... 😉. Yellow for Berger might be a little hard to see. Otherwise, the charts do a good job of visually depicting the numerical results 👍
 
Great info... but it might make things a little bit more intuitive when people look at the graphics if the red line was Hornady, because... 😉. Yellow for Berger might be a little hard to see. Otherwise, the charts do a good job of visually depicting the numerical results 👍
That is a good point, I knew something felt off when making these. I just updated the graphs and switched the colors.
 
Just picked up my 6 Dasher barrels yesterday, going to try to get a bunch of shooting done on Saturday. Going to change it up a bit though, and do 2, 10 round round groups of Aeromatch 105, 105 hyb, 109 LRHT, and 110 SMK with varget and N150 with each bullet.

After this test I will continue to evaluate the 105 aero match vs the 105 berger hybrids with some shooting at distance.
 
Just picked up my 6 Dasher barrels yesterday, going to try to get a bunch of shooting done on Saturday. Going to change it up a bit though, and do 2, 10 round round groups of Aeromatch 105, 105 hyb, 109 LRHT, and 110 SMK with varget and N150 with each bullet.

After this test I will continue to evaluate the 105 aero match vs the 105 berger hybrids with some shooting at distance.
Keep us informed haha
 
solid info

id be curious how different lots of bergers compare to your base lot of bergers as you buy more over time...in just bench measurements

in the past ive had bench measurable differences from lot to lot in bergers i thought was going to be significant when shooting them, but on paper and at distance on steel, i couldnt tell any notable difference. i cant say the same for hornady
 
  • Like
Reactions: memilanuk
solid info

id be curious how different lots of bergers compare to your base lot of bergers as you buy more over time...in just bench measurements

in the past ive had bench measurable differences from lot to lot in bergers i thought was going to be significant when shooting them, but on paper and at distance on steel, i couldnt tell any notable difference. i cant say the same for hornady
I just ordered another 2000 105 hybrids, no promise I will get to it anytime soon but I will definitely get around to measuring them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: morganlamprecht
Got a chance to do some shooting today. Unfortunately with the January ND weather along with working out kinks in a new rifle things didn't quite go to plan. I only had time to shoot the 105 hybrid and 105 Aeromatch with Varget and N150, and the Varget test didn't quite go to plan as I had some really extreme condensation issues after shooting a string that would cause the first shot of the next string to go low and eventually lead to heavy bolt lift even with very mild loads. I verified this was a condensation issue by drying out the chamber with a mop before shooting a string, and the heavy bolt lift went away. I also fixed the on-target issue by just shooting a fouler before the groups. I will not be sharing the Varget results, as the noise in the data and issues with the condensation made an apples to apples comparison impossible and I want to make sure I am presenting things as openly and honestly as possible.

Details of the rifle and ammo:
Bat Hammerhead action
Proof 26" competition contour 7.5" twist barrel in 6 Dasher with a .120 freeborn reamer
Vortex Razor Gen 3 6-36 in Area 419 rings
MDT ACC Elite Chassis
LPM prototype 6.5 cal PRS Silencer with brake end cap
Triggertech Diamond 2 stage

Virgin alpha 6 Dasher brass, sprayed with One Shot, ran through a mandrel, chamfered and deburred
CCI 450 magnum primers
30.8 grains of N150
105 Hybrid or 105 Aeromatch seated .040" off the lands

Groups were measured with the 4DOF app, I won't bore you with posting all 8 images of the groups. The 105 Aeromatch groups are on the target with "6R" right above it. The 105 Berger Hybrid groups are on the target with the "6L" right above it. Ignore all the shots in the center of the targets, as those were foolers/sighters and mean nothing in this test.

I loaded 11 rounds in the magazine and shot 1 into the center diamond as a fouler
Then I shot 5 shots at one of the points of the diamond, and another 5 at another point, then let the rifle cool.

105 Hornady Aeromatch and N150105 Berger Hybrid Target and N150
Group SizeMean RadiusGroup SizeMean Radius
.34".1".24".1"
.30".13".31".13"
.25".11".27".12"
.30".11".34".12"
.2975" AVG.1125" AVG.2900" AVG.1175" AVG
MV 2762 AVG3.4 SDMV 2803 AVG7.3 SD

Ultimately the results are quite boring. The two bullets shot essentially identical group sizes at 100 yards. The biggest difference was in the MV and SD (measured on a Garmin Xero). I am wondering if the change in bullet copper composition is what raised the mv of the Bergers, as I shot them second. I just cleaned the barrel thoroughly and am going to load up some more of the 105 Berger Hybrids with the same charge and see what they chrono at. Hopefully I can do that and also shoot these loads at 600 yards on paper this weekend if the weather cooperates.

Aeromatch 105
tempImagepkjtwo.jpg




105 Berger Hybrids
tempImage9Dry1H.jpg
 
I just ordered another 2000 105 hybrids, no promise I will get to it anytime soon but I will definitely get around to measuring them.
right on, no pressure lol

i know doing stuff like this takes time/$ and the pay is terrible...i been there lol

just an additional note i was curious about if you had the time and the inclination...good stuff either way!
 
he two bullets shot essentially identical group sizes at 100 yards. The biggest difference was in the MV and SD (measured on a Garmin Xero). I am wondering if the change in bullet copper composition is what raised the mv of the Bergers, as I shot them second. I just cleaned the barrel thoroughly and am going to load up some more of the 105 Berger Hybrids with the same charge and see what they chrono at. Hopefully I can do that and also shoot these loads at 600 yards on paper this weekend if the weather cooperates.

Maybe it was the slightly larger diameter of the Hybrids? Bit more resistance and pressure build initially creating more velocity.

Interested to see what you find on paper at 600 yards, or even farther out if you're able. The thing I've always liked about the Bergers is how well they fly and hold groups at distance, so curious how the Hornady compares and how the BC matches up.
 
Maybe it was the slightly larger diameter of the Hybrids? Bit more resistance and pressure build initially creating more velocity.

Interested to see what you find on paper at 600 yards, or even farther out if you're able. The thing I've always liked about the Bergers is how well they fly and hold groups at distance, so curious how the Hornady compares and how the BC matches up.
That could be, with Varget they were within 7 fps average, and i shot the Hornady second, but it could be that the barrel is speeding up already and gaining 10-20 fps per string.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sheldon N
Likely the final update from me on these. I shot both bullets with the exact same load at 633 and 979 yards on Saturday, with some interesting observations. The big one is that at least for this barrel, I can go from Berger to Hornady, but not Hornady to Berger. You will see in the table below what it does to the average muzzle velocity when switching between the two bullets. The different jacket compositions must cause some weird galling/fouling that dramatically increases pressures. The order in which the data is displayed in the table is the order in which they were shot.

I am not sure how representative the 979 yard groups are, as the barrel was quite hot for the Hornady group, and the wind had died down and the mirage off the barrel was bad with the Berger group. So some of the angular growth in group size for both bullets may be from the hot barrel or mirage distortion.

Overall I think Hornady did a really impressive job. It remains to be seen how they hold up at distance on average against the very highly renowned Berger 105 Hybrid, but in the limited testing they seem to shoot just as well and on average give slightly better SD numbers.

Unrelated to the comparison, but I did shoot a 10 shot group with the Bergers that measured 1.95" at 633 yards when I jumped the bullets -.015" rather than -.040", so I do believe there is likely room for improvement with both bullets with some tuning.
BulletGroups SizeMean RadiusMuzzle Velocity AVG Muzzle Velocity SD
105 Berger Hybrid
633 Yards
4.17"1.32"2814.86.6
105 Hornady Aeromatch
633 Yards
3.42".86"2804.94.8
105 Berger Hybrid
979 Yards
8.59"2.93"2852.17.7
105 Hornady Aeromatch
979 yards
8.66"2.61"2827.33.6


IMG_8494.jpg
IMG_8495.jpg
IMG_8498.jpg
IMG_8499.jpg
 
I've had subpar results with the AeroMatch 105's compared to Berger 105's. Shooting them out of my 18" Proof gas gun, the Hornady group sizes are larger and the muzzle velocity SD's are worse. I loaded up 25 rounds of each in Alpha brass bumped to the exact length to .0005", CCI 41's, Leverolution dropped with an AutoTrickler, and then randomly pulled powder dropped cases for each and seated on a Zero with a Whidden 105 Berger custom stem. SD for the Bergers was 9fps and 11.2 fps for Hornady. Hornady definitely grouped larger - here are some representative groups from the Bergers and the AreoMatches. One of my friends also had similar results comparing Hornady's and Bergers out of his 6 ARC this past weekend.

I'm disappointed with the results because Berger's latest increase this month had me hoping to save 25% with AreoMatches for my practice ammo.

image_cropper_986CFE48-95D1-46FA-A3F1-5A3E1254E6D7-34643-00000DCF0901A3E9.JPG
image_cropper_4A7392D5-BC11-45C4-8844-679B725AD505-34643-00000DCE9EC697CD.JPG
 
Just curious, did you shoot the Hornady first, maybe on a clean bore? It looks from the locations of the first three shots that you or the gun was settling in. The final 7 shot group pretty decent.
 
I have shot about 175-200 of the 105 Aeromatch bullets...the pics are when I put the first hundred through a new barrel, new alpha brass, new barrel...the paper was the first 7 rounds out of the new barrel at 100yds the group on steel was the last 5 rounds at 600yds, the high shot was 1g more powder than the 4 lower rounds and that's a 9mm case for reference .

I almost ordered 3000 of the Areomatch and am glad I waited....long store short I have not had any loads group anywhere near this well, the 4 shot group on steel velocities were about 2625 I've ran them from 2700 up to 2900 and nothing under 3/4". At some point I am going to down load back to 2600-2650 and see if I can get them to shoot this well again...might be a week or two before I do but I will report back.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0764.jpeg
    IMG_0764.jpeg
    212.8 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_0767.jpeg
    IMG_0767.jpeg
    493.2 KB · Views: 28
Last edited: