• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

Ingenuity Powder System

I uploaded the files to Makerworld here is the link AT Straight Drop Funnel stl I made one for the V3 and the V4. There is a regular size and longer size. I like the longer version more since the Ingenuity Precision Powder Cup is shorter then the AutoTrickler Powder Cup. If you give them a try let me know what you think
Thank you. I’ll get it printed this weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claytallica
Paul texted me this pictures. He has a Adapter that v3 can go on top of it. makes it one piece unit.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1294(1).jpg
    IMG_1294(1).jpg
    477.5 KB · Views: 216
  • IMG_1296(1).jpg
    IMG_1296(1).jpg
    388.4 KB · Views: 214
I just got the IP Electronics for the V3 and it is pretty awesome so far. Having the controller is nice, I was surprised how quite the powder thrower motor is with the IP electronics/controller.

Based off of what Smokenaces posted about removing the baffle on the V3 funnel, I made and 3d printed a nozzle without the baffle. While I was testing the nozzle out, it seemed like the angle of the funnel can cause the occasional gun powder kernel to come out of the nozzle at an almost sideway trajectory and miss the powder cup.

I made another nozzle that is a very slight taper from bigger to smaller with the intent to make the gun powder drop straight down. I did around 100 throws last night with the IP Powder cup and the straight drop funnel and I didn't have a single kernel bounce out or not make it into the IP powder cup.

I definitely think a funnel with a straight drop workers better with the IP Powder Cup.

Here is what I made if anybody wants to replicate it or I could probably upload it so people with 3d printers can printer their own. I'm still new to CAD so I'm sure someone with more experience could make a better one than me.

View attachment 8619516

View attachment 8619517
It needs to have about a 1/2'' straight cylinder section at the bottom. This is what steers the kernels to fall directly down and not come out the bottom at weird angles
 
Looks great @Maurygold

So, you can either use Jim's enclosure OR the one provided by Paul? Or did you request that particular combo because you wanted to use the enclosure?

My understanding is the v3 base will work on either Paul’s new enclosure or Jim’s. I wanted to keep the plexiglass one because I like it more and it works perfect
 
  • Like
Reactions: NiteQwill
why did the design change from metal to plastic?

We could guess at a number of reasons...

- cost of manufacture
- speed of manufacture
- potential advantages of materials used vs metal
- manufacturing in-house vs. outsourced
- rapid iteration/improvement of parts

Depending on material used, you won't notice a practical difference vs. a machined metal part
 
We could guess at a number of reasons...

- cost of manufacture
- speed of manufacture
- potential advantages of materials used vs metal
- manufacturing in-house vs. outsourced
- rapid iteration/improvement of parts

Depending on material used, you won't notice a practical difference vs. a machined metal part
Except for a lower cost (I hope)
 
  • Like
Reactions: davere
Except for a lower cost (I hope)

I'd expect that, yeah - $55 for the part... implies manufacturing cost of $20-25... I have no idea how to compare between a printed part and a machined aluminum part as far as cost estimating, etc, goes, but that feels cheaper than a machined part might be? There are folks on this forum that know that stuff, though - maybe one of them will weigh in. But... cost to manufacture for a printed part depends on technology and materials used. I do a little FDM printing, and material cost can be all over the place, depending on what you're using and how you print it....
 
Here is a link to Paul’s video on the new adapter.


Got mine set up last nite , It works very well . Pulled a clear top off another scale and dropped it on the A&D . Loaded 4350 from 40.5 to 41.5 in incements of .10 and 10 loads fot a total of 100 had maybe 5 overthrows . Overall I am very happy ! Now come on with the bulk dropper.
 
Last edited:
Got mine set up last nite , It works very well . Pulled a clear top off another scale and dropped it on the A&D . Loaded 4350 from 40.5 to 41.5 in incements of .10 and 10 loads fot a total of 100 had maybe 5 overthrows . Overall I am very happy ! Now come on with the bulk dropper.

I took the trickle throw down to 90% and saw very few overs with 5-7 second pour times.
 
Also, want to make sure everyone is clear what an underthrow or overthrow is with the IP electronics...

Paul told me the resolution of the IP electronics is +/- 0.02gr.. thats + OR - 0.02gr..

The reason is because the A&D Fx120i/300i scales resolution is only 0.02gr..

So, if you set to dump say 37.00gr Varget like in my above video.. and all your drops are within 0.02gr of your target weight of 37gr... you dont have any over or under throws.. that means if you have drops of 36.98, 37.00 or 37.02....thats dead on and is not an over or under throw..

An over or under throw would be any drop more than 0.02gr above or below your target weight..

So, for my 37.00gr target weight an under throw would be 36.96 or less and an over throw would be 37.04 or more...

I may be preaching to the choir here but wanted to make sure everyone knows what the resolution of the electronics and scala are and what an over or under throw is if you didn't know already.
 
Last edited: