ELDM lot-to-lot variation

Bevan

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 3, 2009
777
113
I'm shooting the 108gr ELDM from a 6mmGT in a Brux barrel. I tested loads with one particular box to check if my barrel liked the bullet - shot 3x 10rd groups around 0.5-.0.6 MOA group size (0.05 - .06MRAD mean radius). Seemed all good, so I purchased 1000 bullets of a different production lot, and now I'm getting 10rd group sizes around 0.9-1+ MOA (mean radius 0.07+ MRAD) with that lot.

This is pretty frustrating, all I can pin it on is lot-to-lot variation in the bullets - the 1K I bought coming from a lot where, for whatever reason, the quality of the bullets is lower.

Anyone else seen a degree of lot-to-lot variation like this?

If that's the problem, what can be done about it? Really hard to test a production lot before buying the same lot in bulk with the market conditions these days
 
I haven’t ran the eldm. I run a ton of ELDX and they seem decent

I had a box back in the day (can’t remember if it was Amax or SST) but it had a .017” difference in a box of 100 bullets from base to ogive. It was very clear when seating before I measured them that they came off different machines even though it was a single box of 100 bullets
 
friendsdontletfriends.png
 
Last edited:
I wouldn’t say variations are a bad thing just fyi. Obviously my example above was a bit extreme. A box of 175 smk was .003” compared to the .017” of the hornady

Generally if I’m running a bullet .020 off the lands. When I switch lots I remeasure the new lot to seat the same .020 off the lands.

Variation in a single lot is not good. But some variations lot to lot is expected
 
Hornady would tell you that your first lot didn't shoot 0.5" because you were fooling yourself with small sample sizes. If you would have shot 30rd groups you would have seen their true inside-one-lot variation and would now understand there is no lot-to-lot variation. Just their normal variation.
 
I came across this with the 75gr eldm’s. I had a load that hammered at a decent speed in my .223 so I bought 1000 more when I ran out. New lot had Terrible accuracy, I tried all different seating depths, powders, Hornady even had me send them some but the came back and said they tested fine for them. The bto measurements on the old lot to new lot were significant when measuring just the bullet. I ended up finding a charge that shot around .5-.6 moa but I had to slow them down to 2550 fps. It got me through an event I needed to shoot but I simply gave up on them (for this gun atleast).
 
I shoot the 108 eldm cuz its a lot of bc for the price and they don't ricochet as much as other match type bullets. Perfect for prairie dogs. I have made impacts at 1770 yards and 1k yards is just too easy if it aint too windy. A 20 shot group is .6" at 100. See if you can tune em up.

Got to temper expectations. I think i paid 38 a box on sale. In comparison i just got 190 gr berger LRHT for like 69 a box and that was on sale. Everywhere else was 76 bucks! Yeah, I should hope bergers are better!
 
I shoot the 108 eldm cuz its a lot of bc for the price and they don't ricochet as much as other match type bullets. Perfect for prairie dogs. I have made impacts at 1770 yards and 1k yards is just too easy if it aint too windy. A 20 shot group is .6" at 100. See if you can tune em up.

Got to temper expectations. I think i paid 38 a box on sale. In comparison i just got 190 gr berger LRHT for like 69 a box and that was on sale. Everywhere else was 76 bucks! Yeah, I should hope bergers are better!

I just dropped a steaming pile of crap 💩 that I have labeled high grade fertilizer for your flower garden. It will cost you HALF of what you’d pay for real fertilizer. Just remember to “temper expectations”.

I guess we need to get the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) involved, to define “Match Grade” in shooting.

As far as I am concerned, the Hornady bullet weight differential within a box of 100 and the FPF differential from lot to lot with Hornady ammo, is far from match grade. With no standard in place ,THAT is my OPINION.

If the standard for “Match Grade” was clearly defined, and they did in fact fall within that those parameters, I wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.


IMG_7134.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocketmandb
I pay less for Hornady, and I expect less because of it. Sometimes I get great results, and sometimes I'll see more variation than others for sure. If I were paying Berger prices it would irritate me...but I'm $0.15 - 0.25 less per bullet.

As someone who recreationally shoots 250 - 650 yards 99% of the time, this isn't a hindrance...but it does get a touch frustrating at times to have a CBTO variation of .005 or more.

Bonus that the ELD-M has been a critter slayer for me lately...so I just look at them like a thin-skinned hunting bullet. Probably wouldn't try to compete in an F-Class match with them though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RabbitSlayer48
I just dropped a steaming pile of crap 💩 that I have labeled high grade fertilizer for your flower garden. It will cost you HALF of what you’d pay for real fertilizer. Just remember to “temper expectations”.

I guess we need to get the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) involved, to define “Match Grade” in shooting.

As far as I am concerned, the Hornady bullet weight differential within a box of 100 and the FPF differential from lot to lot with Hornady ammo, is far from match grade. With no standard in place ,THAT is my OPINION.

If the standard for “Match Grade” was clearly defined, and they did in fact fall within that those parameters, I wouldn’t have a leg to stand on.


View attachment 8671807
If you are triggered by "match grade" with Hornady bullets, you will probably have a seizure with the term when it is applied to rimfire ammo. Half the dang boxes on the shelf say match grade, but they are no better than basic CCI when you start weighing, measuring, and using a chrono. The only ones that are actually any better are the most expensive lapua, eley, rws, and sk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bakwa