Re: 1426 yard deer
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bohem</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I suppose what I find the most interesting in this thread is that we've devolved the argument into ethical hunting distances; driven there by people who don't hunt and also by people who've never taken a shot even 50% the distance at which this animal was killed.
I have seen a lot of poorly hit animals at distances less than 10% of the shot in question.
There's no replacement for trigger time and "saddle time". If you haven't hunted before or you don't have many hours scouting and watching wild animals <span style="text-decoration: underline">in the field</span> I find such suppositions about integrity and hunter morality laughable.
There's a classic saying that is quite applicable and it has something to do with "walking a mile in their shoes".
I've sent a whole lot of rounds downrange past 1000yd with much smaller calibers than this and connecting at similar distances worries me less than trying to hit a running animal in the brush. Yet you don't hear this kind of chin music from a guy that busts a buck at 60yd that he jumped on a drive.
Jared Joplin culled a doe at 1100+ with his 284 a couple of months back. The energy, wind drift, ToF, and drop characteristics of his bullet at 1100yd is practically a twin to the characteristics of this 338 Edge.
There wasn't so much as a peep regarding the ethics of his "bang. flop" kill on a doe that was standing and grazing around on a road. <span style="color: #CC0000">Yet the OP takes a 4 page running commentary from the non-hunters who haven't taken a shot past 800yd on anything in their lifetime?</span>
That's the stuff internet legends are made from I suppose.
ETA: PGS' advice is spot on IMO. The ability is on tap <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="text-decoration: underline">if necessary</span></span> but it is the job of a hunter to make sure necessity an option of last resort. </div></div>
Bohem , your statement in red is unqualified and conjecture - you dont know how many of the posters hunt dont hunt ,shoot amazing at what ever distances .The point being made by these ethically sensible posters is its not worth shooting an animal at that distance due to the unacceptable higher possiblities of a wound shot being made rather than a kill shot and having the animal run off to die a horrible death .Its not about how much time behind the trigger youve had cause you can still miss.
Its about being sensible and being able to "no"
Guys miss at close range let alone longe range .I too have put down a lot of rounds at a k and if theres wind oohh there are plenty of 1-2-3 foot misses , I just cant feel the wind at a K like I can at 100 yards.Now this doesnt make me a novice shooter or even one that lacks experience -it means in my case I have experiance and knowledge and that is why I dont pull the trigger on an animal at those distances .
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: bohem</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I suppose what I find the most interesting in this thread is that we've devolved the argument into ethical hunting distances; driven there by people who don't hunt and also by people who've never taken a shot even 50% the distance at which this animal was killed.
I have seen a lot of poorly hit animals at distances less than 10% of the shot in question.
There's no replacement for trigger time and "saddle time". If you haven't hunted before or you don't have many hours scouting and watching wild animals <span style="text-decoration: underline">in the field</span> I find such suppositions about integrity and hunter morality laughable.
There's a classic saying that is quite applicable and it has something to do with "walking a mile in their shoes".
I've sent a whole lot of rounds downrange past 1000yd with much smaller calibers than this and connecting at similar distances worries me less than trying to hit a running animal in the brush. Yet you don't hear this kind of chin music from a guy that busts a buck at 60yd that he jumped on a drive.
Jared Joplin culled a doe at 1100+ with his 284 a couple of months back. The energy, wind drift, ToF, and drop characteristics of his bullet at 1100yd is practically a twin to the characteristics of this 338 Edge.
There wasn't so much as a peep regarding the ethics of his "bang. flop" kill on a doe that was standing and grazing around on a road. <span style="color: #CC0000">Yet the OP takes a 4 page running commentary from the non-hunters who haven't taken a shot past 800yd on anything in their lifetime?</span>
That's the stuff internet legends are made from I suppose.
ETA: PGS' advice is spot on IMO. The ability is on tap <span style="font-style: italic"><span style="text-decoration: underline">if necessary</span></span> but it is the job of a hunter to make sure necessity an option of last resort. </div></div>
Bohem , your statement in red is unqualified and conjecture - you dont know how many of the posters hunt dont hunt ,shoot amazing at what ever distances .The point being made by these ethically sensible posters is its not worth shooting an animal at that distance due to the unacceptable higher possiblities of a wound shot being made rather than a kill shot and having the animal run off to die a horrible death .Its not about how much time behind the trigger youve had cause you can still miss.
Its about being sensible and being able to "no"
Guys miss at close range let alone longe range .I too have put down a lot of rounds at a k and if theres wind oohh there are plenty of 1-2-3 foot misses , I just cant feel the wind at a K like I can at 100 yards.Now this doesnt make me a novice shooter or even one that lacks experience -it means in my case I have experiance and knowledge and that is why I dont pull the trigger on an animal at those distances .