I like the idea of the anchors too but I don't like chasing them. More importantly my two dogs chew on anything they can find
so I don't need them choking on them. Once a week one of them is hacking up one of my socks.
Personally, I would pull the extractor and use the same anchor repeatedly. Metal endures things that your not
aware of when it is struck and then has no case rim to cushion and absorb the energy. That energy has to go somewhere and I believe
it's best to send it into the anchor. Yours is even worse because of it's additional mass at the aft end that represents more energy.
I would have to see what the FP is repeatedly hammering inside of the bolt. The breach area isn't the only
place that may take damage. Since it's not hitting the breach, something else must be absorbing the energy of the
spring / FP combination.
I just pasted this from the Nordic Marksman FP link from above:
Note: Firing pin to be adjusted in length by qualified gunsmith.
It looks like they cut the nose short to preserve the breach but that doesn't mean that dry firing is now safe.
Using that pin as an example, I would not want the taper at the front of the FP to be hammering into the inside of my bolt.
I know, yours is different but I would look what stops it's forward motion. My 54 FP is different than both of them.
Good luck.
That is the wrong pin. That is for the current bolt. Following Evellio's assertion, I have satisfied myself he is right, the pin does not touch the barrel end. Damn close, but no touch!
I like the idea of the screw anchors. Cheaper and easier than the snap caps. The idea of chasing them around my basement leaves me a little weak though.
SA2