Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good for her. If she was held to the same level as men in the course then she is g2g
Glad you think there funny. In my about to be 23 years of service I have had female troops that ran circles around the male counterparts. Usually not in the physical stuff but in the thinking and execution to solve a problem.
oh i dont disagree at all. but its the physical part that they cant pass on the same standards. you know it. i know it and they know it. i mean they practically walked those female officers through ranger school. they got more chances than any male ever would. in my day, i saw females get 3 4 5 redos on flight exam practicals while the men got 1 redo and your out.Glad you think there funny. In my about to be 23 years of service I have had female troops that ran circles around the male counterparts. Usually not in the physical stuff but in the thinking and execution to solve a problem.
well saidoh i dont disagree at all. but its the physical part that they cant pass on the same standards. you know it. i know it and they know it. i mean they practically walked those female officers through ranger school. they got more chances than any male ever would. in my day, i saw females get 3 4 5 redos on flight exam practicals while the men got 1 redo and your out.
if the standards were equal i would have no issue.
General Milley?Glad you think there funny. In my about to be 23 years of service I have had female troops that ran circles around the male counterparts. Usually not in the physical stuff but in the thinking and execution to solve a problem.
yeah but they cant pass the physical part. the shooting is like a tenth of being an actual "sniper" Find me a female that can throw a 210 lb soldier in full kit over their shoulder and carry them for even 50 yds and maybe you have a contender. maybe. pull ups. obstacle course. running. swimming and all the other bullshit. no way they pass with the same standards. youd have to gender normalize that shit and that doesnt help anyone, especially the female.There are more than a few excellent female shooters out there. Pretty sure Regina or Lena can more than hold there own.
I can’t speak too much for the army side but I can tell you the shooting aspect is (important) but a very small portion of the totality of training and the job itself.There are more than a few excellent female shooters out there. Pretty sure Regina or Lena can more than hold there own.
*they’reGlad you think there funny. In my about to be 23 years of service I have had female troops that ran circles around the male counterparts. Usually not in the physical stuff but in the thinking and execution to solve a problem.
I can’t speak too much for the army side but I can tell you the shooting aspect is (important) but a vary small portion of the totality of training and the job itself.
Well I met a F35 demo pilot this year that could do things with that plane that would make many grown men pass out. Oh yea, she was a petite female. Flying a fighter is a different type of being physical fit, but still very physical nontheless. Everyone in here comparing females to grunt only positions when there are many other types of "physical" none grunt duties...General Milley?
When it comes to military standards for certain programs, it seems only the Army passes these women. There seems to be largest amount of woke bureaucrats in that exist in the army too. I dare say the standards change often. Plus you have too many POGs in charge of your service.
Also the standard of running around male counter parts in the 11b to cav scouts in the army is a small standard to begin with.
How many women have have made in any other program that has been open for years now? In organizations that refuse to lower said standard. I can tell you the Marine Corps didn’t.
We can compare the best females vs the worst males…but we both know when it comes to special programs, combat related qualifications and jobs, only being the better than standards, and your peers (selectee’s) is what matters.
From what I’ve seen, it’s extremely rare to have a female both want to do an job of such AND be qualified in merit or physically for when it matters.
The modern female fighter pilot is diffeent. the pushing them through mentality has mostly since been stopped. they learned their lessons. the vast majority today have rightfully earned their place in the seat and id happily fly with any of them and have. hell thunderbird number 5 is a woman. but a female fighter pilot isnt carrying a fucking 30 lb rifle and 90 lbs of gear and dragging a grunt out of the line of fire. its not apples to apples to say that just because they can fly the F35 they can be a sniper. sure, they absolutely can, but the difference is the female pilot has the same standards as a male pilot in all aspects. thats the key. there is no gender normalizing (other than probably the annual physical fitness test required by the service which usually are gender normalized for some reason).Well I met a F35 demo pilot this year that could do things with that plane that would make many grown men pass out. Oh yea, she was a petite female. Flying a fighter is a different type of being physical fit, but still very physical nontheless. Everyone in here comparing females to grunt only positions when there are many other types of "physical" none grunt duties...
Glad you think there funny. In my about to be 23 years of service I have had female troops that ran circles around the male counterparts. Usually not in the physical stuff but in the thinking and execution to solve a problem.
Did you miss my very first response? "Good for her. If she was held to the same level as men in the course then she is g2g"So you're saying physical standards don't matter?
Or that they're the same for both genders?
In the Navy differences in physical strength and fitness don't matter when you're sitting on a console, but they sure as fuck matter when that same compartment is engulfed in flames (or flooding) with dead and wounded sailors lying around.
Bitch,Well I met a F35 demo pilot this year that could do things with that plane that would make many grown men pass out. Oh yea, she was a petite female. Flying a fighter is a different type of being physical fit, but still very physical nontheless. Everyone in here comparing females to grunt only positions when there are many other types of "physical" none grunt duties...
You sed bush.Y'all are not thinking.
Could be a good spotter in the bush...
Hours of "down" time.
R
Wow calling someone a bitch seems excessive. I bet you're a blast at parties. Does your wife wear the pants in your house and you have to come here to feel Important?Bitch,
I don’t care about that shit. You came on here cheerleading for woman’s rights on a thread talking all that shit specifically about a female sniper graduate. Snipers are grunts. There are no pilot snipers. Get back to reality and save us the the feminist pov.
Life is a lot better in war in a fast mover or circling a around at 25,000 ft. If I call for air, I don’t care if the pilot is female or male…they need to be quick and accurate. That’s all I care about.
If she was held to the same level as men in the course then she is g2g"
Maybe "bitch" actually hit it's mark.Wow calling someone a bitch seems excessive. I bet you're a blast at parties. Does your wife wear the pants in your house and you have to come here to feel Important?
No. You don’t like being called a bitch stop acting like one with all your fucking pog talk. It’s dirty and my op tempo is higher than jodie’s on YOUR wife. Bitch.Wow calling someone a bitch seems excessive. I bet you're a blast at parties. Does your wife wear the pants in your house and you have to come here to feel Important?
You sound like an angry transgender off their meds. Bet you'll get a good va rating for that...No. You don’t like being called a bitch stop acting like one with all your fucking pog talk. It’s dirty and my op tempo is higher than jodie’s on YOUR wife. Bitch.
LolYou sound like an angry transgender off their meds. Bet you'll get a good va rating for that...
Most combat dudes, even back in the early 2000’s (let alone most current security contractors or firefighters) can’t put 210# on their shoulder with kit on and move 25yds. Most can barely swim in board shorts for any amount of time either. Same goes for pull ups.yeah but they cant pass the physical part. the shooting is like a tenth of being an actual "sniper" Find me a female that can throw a 210 lb soldier in full kit over their shoulder and carry them for even 50 yds and maybe you have a contender. maybe. pull ups. obstacle course. running. swimming and all the other bullshit. no way they pass with the same standards. youd have to gender normalize that shit and that doesnt help anyone, especially the female.
yes agreed. I was exaggerating to make a point. I've said it before, under the same set of standards for any job, im all for it. But we should not lower current standards to accomodate and we should not circumvent the standards just to say we did it.Most combat dudes, even back in the early 2000’s (let alone most current security contractors or firefighters) can’t put 210# on their shoulder with kit on and move 25yds. Most can barely swim in board shorts for any amount of time either. Same goes for pull ups.
All combat MOS standards should be gender and age neutral. Technically all deployable personnel should be required to maintain the combat mos fitness requirement standards…but that will never happen.
In General Response to such a thread:
Props to all who graduate and earn the title, man or woman. Those who shit talk such accomplishments typically have never done it themselves or were/are insecure shitbags. Are there exceptions? Absolutely. Let’s not take away from one’s accomplishments and let their reputation do the leg work. This is what’s makes us better than the assholes who look to put down those who have accomplished what they failed to do.
![]()
Most combat dudes, even back in the early 2000’s (let alone most current security contractors or firefighters) can’t put 210# on their shoulder with kit on and move 25yds. Most can barely swim in board shorts for any amount of time either. Same goes for pull ups.
All combat MOS standards should be gender and age neutral. Technically all deployable personnel should be required to maintain the combat mos fitness requirement standards…but that will never happen.
In General Response to such a thread:
Props to all who graduate and earn the title, man or woman. Those who shit talk such accomplishments typically have never done it themselves or were/are insecure shitbags
![]()
I know man, I’m just saying. I absolutely agree about not circumventing standards. That said, none of us were there so we must give credit where credit is due. I wish her the best and congratulate her for stepping up and completing a difficult task that she volunteered to endure.yes agreed. I was exaggerating to make a point. I've said it before, under the same set of standards for any job, im all for it. But we should not lower current standards to accomodate and we should not circumvent the standards just to say we did it.
obviously we will never know if the same standard was held. i remain skeptical, especially given today's military. And unfortunately for her, she may never get the actual recognition she may deserve because of it. I admit my bias openly. ive seen to many people get killed or hurt because of this shit.
It is because I am glad to see anyone graduate and add to the dwindling numbers in my former field…even if they are in the Army… eww.That’s sweet coming from someone with the screen name m8541reaper. Again, where the fuck is this standard of 210lbs coming from. Your main pack in the corps aren’t even rated to that weight. If you’re talking about maybe carrying full kit and a mk19 up to a hill to a machine gun position…uh yeah…it sucks. The difference is….if a female is there and can’t do it…a dude has to do it. The programs I seen, the doing it once wasn’t even the real problem. It was the doing this stuff for months on end where the problems layed.
So again…there’s nothing wrong with a female passing if she earned it…the problem is confidence of the institution to not have lowered standards and push a student through to be a poster child of progressivism.
That’s dangerous. For all things that involve a selection process…the standards ARE gender neutral… which is why you don’t see female seals or green beenies or marine snipers. You see the concern with this?
Did you finally get your 7 now with your 23 years....there are a shit ton of people on this forum who don't need to go around professing how many years of service they have. I'm sure your a great person to work forYou sound like an angry transgender off their meds. Bet you'll get a good va rating for that...
It's odd topic. People talk about jobs, how long they've had them, new jobs all the time. You're really that sensitive?Did you finally get your 7 now with your 23 years....there are a shit ton of people on this forum who don't need to go around professing how many years of service they have. I'm sure your a great person to work for
Doc
It’s only a odd topic if you’re choosing to comment on something you know nothing about. Even after 23 years of service. Which was what branch exactly? Please don’t tell me Air Force…please don’t tell me you came to lecture us on combat roles by the likes of a career Airman…lolIt's odd topic. People talk about jobs, how long they've had them, new jobs all the time. You're really that sensitive?
Israelis are fully integrated to my knowledge. I worked with a spec ops type unit in ‘99 and they had women in all roles, including sniper. They sucked, but they were there.i am not sure on this. but,i believe the israels had women in all the combat roles during the 1948 war and subsequently removed them. i have no real scource for that,so? we know the russians had female snipers,pilots,drivers and also tank crews in ww2. none in those roles lately i think. if the testing/reqirements are the same,applied consistantly,i don't see how that can be passed over. applies to anything-recon,pilots,snipers,police,fire fighters,crane operators,jack hammer operators,whatever. i don't think it will work in ground combat roles but prob can't avoid the experiment. hope my grandson doesn't become a research participant.
Pilots may be asked to escape and evade if they are downed. This would be reverse stalking. Physicality is probably a big plus there. Anyone in the service may need to fireman's carry someone to safety at any given time. That simple action disqualifies most females. When you add in injury rates and compare readiness it is a no brainer to disqualify them from most specialties.Bitch,
I don’t care about that shit. You came on here cheerleading for woman’s rights on a thread talking all that shit specifically about a female sniper graduate. Snipers are grunts. There are no pilot snipers. Get back to reality and save us the the feminist pov.
Life is a lot better in war in a fast mover or circling a around at 25,000 ft. If I call for air, I don’t care if the pilot is female or male…they need to be quick and accurate. That’s all I care about.
Israelis are fully integrated to my knowledge. I worked with a spec ops type unit in ‘99 and they had women in all roles, including sniper. They sucked, but they were there.
I’ll add, the men sucked too.
This is why I commented about the Air Force up above.U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant Alyssa Gomez, 99th Ground Combat Training Squadron, poses with her M24 Sniper Weapon System, May 11, 2012, at the Nevada Test and Training Range. Gomez is the service's ninth female sniper:
![]()
Air Force 1st Lieutenant Jennifer Weitekamp looks through the scope of her sniper rifle March 28, 2001, at Camp Lincoln in Springfield, Illinois. Weitekamp completed the Air National Guard’s pilot Counter Sniper School conducted by the National Guard Marksmanship Training Center at Camp Joseph T. Robinson, North Little Rock, Arkansas, on April 14, 2001, becoming the first woman to complete a U.S. military sniper school and the first Air Force female sniper. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Robert R. Adams, Public Affairs)
![]()
That’s sweet coming from someone with the screen name m8541reaper. Again, where the fuck is this standard of 210lbs coming from. Your main pack in the corps aren’t even rated to that weight. If you’re talking about maybe carrying full kit and a mk19 up to a hill to a machine gun position…uh yeah…it sucks. The difference is….if a female is there and can’t do it…a dude has to do it. The programs I seen, the doing it once wasn’t even the real problem. It was the doing this stuff for months on end where the problems layed.
So again…there’s nothing wrong with a female passing if she earned it…the problem is confidence of the institution to not have lowered standards and push a student through to be a poster child of progressivism.
That’s dangerous. For all things that involve a selection process…the standards ARE gender neutral… which is why you don’t see female seals or green beenies or marine snipers. You see the concern with this?