At the end of the day a ZComp has better glass and is supposedly more durable (haven't tested it), not to mention the tracking accuracy. High tier scopes generally track 100% more often than mid teir. That better glass allows you to do things that are much harder to do with mid teir scopes. Seeing partially hidden targets, watch trace while shooting, etc. It may or may not be worth it to you, but it does do things that the razor cant, or at least makes it much easier, and the processes and parts that allow it to do these things are expensive.
If you put a dollar bill up at 100 yards I bet you could see the difference.
I love it, it’s the best scope I have ever had. I was in the same boat as the OP and had never owned a scope more than the $500 range. I was settled on the Razor gen 2 until I read the limited but good reviews on the XTR3. Then I decided to throw it in the cart and see the liberty optics price! I clicked buy and saw another discount pop up and couldn’t resist putting the card info in!! My review is worthless since I have no experience with $$ scopes. Wish I could be more helpful with it other than saying I don’t think anyone would regret it!
I love my XTR3 and still want a razor gen 2! And ZCO, maybe a Mark5, ooh a kahles!! I need more guns for these future scopes now that I think of it..
You are a virgin and asking how to make bitches cum with a candestick and a butt plug.
I'm looking at an optika6, 2.5-15 for a varmint gun, coyotes prairie dogs and target shooting, do you feel it's decent for that purpose?
I have a series 3 5-25x56 and a nikon black x1000 6-24x50, working on getting a few others to try as well
The zero stop is something I'd like on my x1000 as well
Forgot a tangent theta and maybe Swarovski
Ive got to the point with scopes that unless its a 3x9 deer scope, I will have a zero stop.
I didnt even know hazzard had a rang. Whats it called. I'm only 1.5 hours from there
I wasnt worried about the quality no being good. I was flipping out cause I dropped 2g on a scope. I knew it is quality. I was just trying to see how 3500 to 5000 could be that much better than 2000. I got the scope in yesterday and was impressed beyond words. Nicest glass ive ever owned. I had debated for years about getting this scope because of the price.
Lol I figured it was on a strip mine. Thats the only way we can shoot long range in these mountains. I'm a former underground miner. Unless you find a cleared out field. 150 yards is a long shot
I know its a big debate but the razor gen I just got seems to have everything I will ever want or need
The price the razors are selling for right now is tough to beat. Plenty of reticle options for them as well.
Scott from Liberty Optics
Contact Us
Click here to edit the introduction of your Contact Page. On this page you should give your visitors information on how they can contact you. The Contact Page Wizard will automatically add your address details to this page.www.libertyoptics.com
If you aren't going to do much dialing, I think it would work good. My preference would be towards the 3-18x50 though. I put a Nikon FX1000 4-16 on my other son's rifle and the glass on the Optika 6 is much better, especially when it comes to resolution and contrast. Brightness and tracking is about the same for both scopes though but you really notice a difference when looking at targets past 500 yards.
