.260 and Varget

Wonder about heavier bullets like the 139 Scenar or 142 SMK? I think for optimal performance they need to be moving at least 2700+ out of the barrel.

Digging through my old data...

140gr A-Max, Lapua brass, WLR
26" 1:8 barrel, .118 freebore
Varget
37.0gr: 2670
37.5gr: 2711
38.0gr: 2773

In a later range trip with 38.0gr Varget in Nosler brass with 140 A-Max (quite possibly a different lot of Varget) average velocity was 2726fps.
 
Digging through my old data...

140gr A-Max, Lapua brass, WLR
26" 1:8 barrel, .118 freebore
Varget
37.0gr: 2670
37.5gr: 2711
38.0gr: 2773

In a later range trip with 38.0gr Varget in Nosler brass with 140 A-Max (quite possibly a different lot of Varget) average velocity was 2726fps.

Good stuff, thanks Boiler!
 
i had been under the impression that varget was not a powder of choice for the 260, given i have no experience with this caliber. it seems varget performance in 260 loads is most optimal with lighter/medium weight bullets?
 
i had been under the impression that varget was not a powder of choice for the 260, given i have no experience with this caliber. it seems varget performance in 260 loads is most optimal with lighter/medium weight bullets?

Yeah me too, until I couldn't get H4350 to shoot to my satisfaction and tried some varget.
 
When we got to SOA I in 2002, the experienced .260 shooters there were recommending 34-36gr of Varget with SRA 140's all the way out to 1Kyd, the 142 was just coming into vogue back around then. We were shooting 139's with 40-41gr of VV N-550, and it was probably too hot a load with too fast a powder. Blew a number of primers when the temps got into the 80's. We ended up keeping our ammo in a cooler. I switched from 139's to 142's after that; they were on the shelf instead of order-only, and my suspicion was/is that the 139's tend(ed) to show pressures sooner, with lighter loads

My first time shooting beyond 300yd, it was a slice of heaven. All I could think was how much easier it was to shoot 1Kyd that I had imagined. It was never that easy again. Shooting across the flat at 6-8000ft ASL in the Southwest is a lot different from shooting across the rolling cropland at 800ft ASL here in the Northeast.

Greg
 
Last edited:
my final varget load at 200 yards. It has done this or better with no shift in POI the last three times out. Only 2875 fps but I am pretty happy with it after struggling with H4350 for a long time.
 

Attachments

  • 260 rem 123 amax 39.3 varget cci 200 yards.jpg
    260 rem 123 amax 39.3 varget cci 200 yards.jpg
    79.5 KB · Views: 78
my final varget load at 200 yards. It has done this or better with no shift in POI the last three times out. Only 2875 fps but I am pretty happy with it after struggling with H4350 for a long time.


i wish i could get varget to shoot in my gun, i have tons of it... i went .3gr up from top to bottom with loads.. all blew in my gun.. rem700 260, 24" CBI Match
 
Seeing the picture of Sherri shouldering her Tubb 2000 in the offhand, it becomes apparent to me that her shoulder stock is significantly foreshortened, presenting an appearance very close to that of a bullpup rifle design.

It's long been a consideration of mine that LOP, as we conventionally consider it, is really more about sight/scope relief, and less about the general body/stock ergonomic relationship. I believe that a shorter LOP, coupled with a more forward sight/scope mounting (ideally combining a barrel block bedding approach, along the sight/scope base mounted directly onto the barrel), allows for a better balance with longer barrels; which I consider to be essential to getting the best performance and bore life out of the .260, and other exceptionally appropriate LR chamberings.

Years back, I gave some thought to action design, rather merging some of the better features of the AR/Stoner design with a more conventional turnbolt operated action. When the Tubb 2000 action appeared, I recognized that the design had already been rendered, far better than anything I could have ever come up with.

Greg
 
Last edited:
Op,
After having no luck at all with H4350 and H4832sc with the 142 SMK's, I decided to try Varget for the hell of it. Right off the bat it grouped tighter than either of the other 2 powders. I settled on 39.5gr of Varget and that gives me an easy 2750fps with .5moa or less accuracy. More than enough for what I was testing for. With the other powders accuracy in the 1-3moa range.

On a side note I only had this accuracy problem with the 142SMK, every other bullet and powder combo shot good for me.

Specs:
Savage action
26in CBI match barrel, Varmint taper
Choate stock.
Rifle Basix trigger.

SY
 
capnswervon,

Please share your results, I'm interested how it turns out

It shot ok but this is what I ran into.

I had 7 charge groups to shoot plus the 3 spotter/foulers.

The first two shots in 4 of 7 of the groups were touching. When I went back thru for the 3rd in each group all kinds of chaos occurred. Shot went here, shot went there. All except for the 1% higher than "max" which was 38gr. The holes were pretty ragged and you could tell that there was some instability in the bullet up around 2780fps. Down near the bottom 35.3gr and 35.7 the holes looked like they were put there with a hole punch...totally asleep but it spit one out of each group. Here is the target. Let me know if you need any other info from it.

image.jpg

The Capn'
 
I loaded 39.8gr of Varget in winny brass 123SMKs and BR2 primers this load was just .5 @ 100 and went 1.25 at 300. The rifle is a FN SPR 22" Shilen 8 twist am going to chrono load when I can find time.
 
After struggling with H4350 to shoot with the lighter bullets, I contacted Dan Newberry. I did the 39.3 (Varget,Lapua Brass,123 Scenars naked, Fed Match Primers) loaded them to mag length (2.810) and shot this 5 shot group at 550 yards out of my PGWDI Coyote. I will note that with the heavier bullets, the H4350 works great, but I was having some weird stuff going on with the lighter bullets when using this powder.



Thanks Dan
 
Last edited:
My load is the same 39.3 Varget, Lapua brass, Tula LRM primer, 123 amax at 2.780 OAL (.025 jump) shoots great out to 400 going to try it at 600-700 when I have a half day to make the trip.
 
So my pet load of 39.3gr Varget with a 120/123 is a 'standard' OCW, eh?

Proof even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and again...:D

BoilerUP pm me your other 260 loads. Really love varget with the 123 scenars, but I have 500 136s I need to try and will go back to 4350 for those.
 

Very interesting, I'm betting with more experimenting you could find a sweet spot with the Varget? 4350 and Varget are close in burn rate are they not? Have you tried moving to a different bullet, perhaps something heavier? Looks like the 4350 is a winner in that round.

But man that is a shit group with the Varget, bummer!
 
Very interesting, I'm betting with more experimenting you could find a sweet spot with the Varget? 4350 and Varget are close in burn rate are they not? Have you tried moving to a different bullet, perhaps something heavier? Looks like the 4350 is a winner in that round.

But man that is a shit group with the Varget, bummer!


i tryed from max down 3 or 4 gr,.3 at a time.. varget would not shoot...


this is my 140 varget test...

FYI.. 39.2 is HOT!.... dont load it...
 
First one is 508 yards 5 shots
second one is 617 yards 3 shots

25" 260 rem with varget and 123 amax. Not much of a dent at 617 with a 123
 

Attachments

  • 260 rem 123 Amax 39.3 Varget at 508 yards.jpg
    260 rem 123 Amax 39.3 Varget at 508 yards.jpg
    97.1 KB · Views: 59
  • 260 rem 123 amax 39.3 varget at 617 yards.jpg
    260 rem 123 amax 39.3 varget at 617 yards.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 70
need 2 crono/dope it, but book would put it 2800+ maybe... need to load a few more to confirm, then 250 to get them done, and go to some LR tests...

You might be good to go then. 2750 fps MV will get a 139-142 close to it's G7 max potential. Did you measure that group with the 38.6 Varget, it looks 1/2. At least all three holes are touching.
 
Tried 40.2 varget with the 130 berger hunting vld's 2930 fps, probably going to hunt this load.
 

Attachments

  • 260 40.2 varget 130 berger 100 yards.jpg
    260 40.2 varget 130 berger 100 yards.jpg
    94.2 KB · Views: 102
  • 260 40.2 varget 130 berger 200 yards.jpg
    260 40.2 varget 130 berger 200 yards.jpg
    100.6 KB · Views: 106
40.2 varget, 130 hunting vld seated at .025 jump with tula prime,r lapua brass
All shots were between 2911 and 2917 on my crappy chronograph.
300 yards and 400 yards slight variable wind
 

Attachments

  • 260 40.2 varget 130 berger 300 yards.jpg
    260 40.2 varget 130 berger 300 yards.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 72
  • 260 40.2 varget 130 berger 400 yards.jpg
    260 40.2 varget 130 berger 400 yards.jpg
    113.1 KB · Views: 59
40.2 varget, 130 hunting vld seated at .025 jump with tula prime,r lapua brass
All shots were between 2911 and 2917 on my crappy chronograph.
300 yards and 400 yards slight variable wind

If your using an optical chrono like a Chroney I would recommend getting at Magneto, very accurate and much easier to set up. One excellent investment. This way you can trust your data.