Re: .308, 05.56 common powder for both?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: poke53</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Out of my measure I am getting .1gr throws out of a progressive press using ar-comp. I tried pro2000mr and it meters awesome like most ball powders. The issue I had with it was temp stability between 10-30 degrees and between 90-100 degrees. I don't want a powder that I feel I have to work up a specific load for the season. Ar-comp is an extruded powder similar to varget but shorter. I didn't see the temp sensativity issues with ar-comp. </div></div>
I see a lot of concern about temperature stability but I don't see the problem, in the real world? Is this a valid consideration, or not?
And, I mean, show me where you were harmed by a load that suffered significantly degraded performance?
You sight in local, Phoenix. You drive to Buffalo for a contest where you sight in, which may require adjustments for elevation and temperature. If you used a powder labeled as "TEMPERATURE STABLE" I guess you wouldn't need to check your zero?
Now as to the original question. I understand simplicity and economy as a factor, but the main consideration is always;
#1 Performance (velocity)
#2 Accuracy
If the happy coincidence occurs that <span style="text-decoration: underline">the same powder delivers #1 & #2 in both rifles</span>, that's great. Amazing, and great, nonetheless.
It is never an objective, or goal, (in my world), as is #1 & #2.
(or, keep shooting until I find the best for both)
Good luck, BB