Re: .308win ammo for Elk
MM,
Excuse the "vernacular" but that was a precursor to my expanded explanation.
Talk about genius. Your ability to decipher context is amazing, yet clearly you were just looking to nit-pick. Anyone knows punching paper will not yield shock value of a projectile, just acuracy. THere is plenty of information, including pictures no less on the manufactures sites. The shock value of the projectile is then ultimately verified in the field after the kill.
Keyholing- call it what you will. I refer to it as a keyhole when there are two holes that intersect each other, reminiscent of a keyhole. THat's what it looks like to me. In other words the POI of the polymers were strings. THe SPBT had separated POI altogether.
Fluctuations- I am not arguing that point. Though it would seem to me that the lead contributes an integral part of that result.
Tighter grain- that was in relation to the consistent delivery and when compared to the lead tipped ammunition.
Corbon- I mistakenly called the Accubonds, Corbons. Then corrected that when I realized what I was stating. Gotta remember to be precise and that scorned nazi pricks like you are looking to make a huge deal out of errors.
I am wondering if you really were a Marine or just a clown that escaped the circus. No one stated shock value, broken bones and pile ups were verified at the range.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Ah yes, "out west", surely not anywhere else, regardless of the range. Exascerbated? Is that like exacerbated? Good idea to only use fancy words if you know how to spell them. It does add to the comedy value though.
<span style="color: #3366FF">Out west is typically where I hunt and where the longest distance shots are predominantly made.It is also where the majority of elk hunting is done.
I'll remember to be acutely specific in my explanation so it is unmistakeably clear in the future . That way it won't upset the balance of your wild emotions. </span>
Originally Posted By: waveone
Whereas the uniformity and tighter grain structure in polymers render a devastating blow on impact to the objective.
OMFG that's funny. I guess I need some polymer tipped for the 308, and all will be to your satisfaction. gotta love that "tighter grain structure", that shit really renders a devastating blow.....FUCKING ROLLING....
<span style="color: #3366FF"> Have you tried them? Until you have it might be wise to reserve your comments. Most likely not.THe 155gr Amaxes for the .308 is a fantastic projectile. </span>
Originally Posted By: waveone
That's the shock value you want. It will blow a hole in the critter and break bone in the process if needs be. THat way they pile up right smart if you do your job.
Got it. polymer tip, and do my job. The result will invariably be massive shock value, blown holes, broken bones, and right smart pile ups. All discovered at the rifle range sight-in.....Dude, you are HILARIOUS!
<span style="color: #3366FF">Keep laughin clown. Only an idiot and an ass like yourself would derive that I ascertained that while at the range. I don't know of any range that experiences herds of wild animals roaming around the field of fire. </span>
</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Extreme difficulty tracking doesn't sound like a good time. Sounds like you've done a lot of it. If the welfare of animals is important to you, don't shoot at the fucking things!!!.....LOL</div></div>
THis is prof positive you are grasping and using hyperbole to make failed points. It is also clear you have no clue as to what you are speaking about on this topic.
THings happen and the variables are many. THe time of day, season, stress on the animal, shot POI and so forth have great bearing on what happens after the shot. None of which you seem to have any experience in.
Extreme tracking- I have done some without question over the last 30 years since I started hunting at age nine. Anyone saying otherwise is lying or has little experience such as yourself.
Twice this my animal. Both were in heavy brush. Even still, everything can be done right and still turn out wrong. THat's hunting. Though you would have to have done quite a bit of it, to understand this which clearly you have not. Thus the stupid comments.
Welfare - as in humane kill bugwit. Not well being. THat is obvious to anyone who doesn't have an agenda.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> Originally Posted By: waveone
Try them , you'll like them.
Incidentally, the distances I shot at are not always typical. I bow hunt so getting close is always the name of the game, bow or gun. Just not always achievable. It is advisable to take a very "makeable", ethical shot and respect your game.
Great way to wrap it all up. A used car salesman's pitch, followed up with unquantified, self-aggrandizing, and moralistic horseshit. Par. </div></div>
This gem slams the door on any notion to the contrary that you are on a mission and attempting to redeem your bumbling ass. It's also pathetic.
THere is no "moralistic horseshit" about being ethical when hunting. Nor about makeable shots to the kill zone. THe term "makeable" is for the indivudal to determine based upon their ability. For idiots such as yourself use the Mr Humble "ass shot" for contrast.
Ethics are as much involved in hunting as abiding the law is. Everyone is watching like the anti gun dirt bags. Eco pukes are looking for ways to shut us down. THey have infiltrated the DOW offices all over the nation and accumulate statistics to advance their agenda.
Self aggrandizing- If you are not trying to get close, you really aren't hunting. Expecially when bowhunting.
Let me know if that is not dumbed down enough for you clown aka MM.
