Taking overkill to a whole new level.
kd185
Thank you for giving us your insight. You defiantly have experience shooting .50s. I am no expert in ballistics but I do know some. I believe in my case I am good to go. I am in no way bashing what you have said. But let me see if I can address each of your concerns.
1: for powders, I am able to get my hands on yes military suplus powder for howitzer canons (it is not pull down. It is brand new) It is really slow stuff.
2: I am using a 20mm vulcan case necked down with approx 500 grains of powder capacity
3: I haven't completed the gun yet but I should be exceeding 3100 fps (not tested yet)
4: My barrel is 50" long
5 and 6: my twist rate is 1:10
7: yes recoil will be higher but my rig has a triple hydraulic dampner and spring system and the gun weighs 100lbs
8: With a projectile around that size a 1:11 ish twist is needed with the speeds i am hitting and I don't know how well the BC really is but time will tell.
9: I have read Litz book. It is very informative. It really shows how some bullet company's will only post G1 bc instead of G7 just because it is a higher number but it really doesn't represent it's true flight characteristics.
If you are curious here is a recent photo of my progress of building my gun. It isn't done yet but I have a .50bmg windrunner next to it to give a size comparison. The barrel isn't chambered yet. I just stuck it in the barrel shroud to give an idea of the size. There will be a muzzle break on it later.
many many reasons
1. no available match grade powders slow enough to launch a bullet that heavy (possible some military pull downs but nothing readily available, easily accessible or of the quality to match the quality of cnc brass solid)
2. a bmg case is not large enough to carry an adequate powder charge for a bullet that heavy (a charge of 250 grains of Reloader 50 doesn't fill it but there is not much room left)
3. nor can it get that bullet up to a speed fast enough to stabilize
4. you would need a longer barrel than the standard long barrels of 36" to get a full burn (yes i know M2 barrels are longer than 36" but not designed for this application)
5. a brass solid projectile in .510 cant get much heavier than 820 with out getting to long to stabilize or have a decent center of gravity
6. state arms in the 90's was one of the only company's to ever offer a barrel twist of anything besides 1 in 15 and those are few and far between these days (as far as i know of)
7. there is a noticable difference in recoil from a 750 to an 800 can you imagine what a 1075 would be like
8. spend a few minutes with any of these (the miller twist rule, the greenhill formula, a drag/twist calculator) and tell me what you find
9. read Applied Ballistics by Bryan Litz and tell me what you find
i dont claim to be an expert but i have 2 - 50 bmg rifles for the last 7 years
i reload everything i shot
i have shot in 12 FCSA 1,000 yard matches in the last 6 years
ive got over 1,500 bmg rounds down range
the most ive shot was 96 rounds in 1 day due to a make-up day in the rain
my best group to date was 7-1/8" 5 shot @ 1,000 yards off the ground with a bi-pod and a sand bag
nothing great but nothing to laugh at either
ive been following this thread since the beginning and i cant believe its gotten this far
i dont know the OP "groper"
and dont want to call anyone names
but it sounds like some has spent to much time in front of a cad-cam program and not enough time behind a trigger or a reloading bench
yes they have included a few trick features of match grade custom ELR bullets but again it looks good on paper or a monitor
ask Lehigh or TenX (2 of the best brass solids on the market in my opinion) why they dont make bullets much heavier than 800 grains in brass solids
as far as bullets go i have been researching this as i have just recently started swaging my own copper jacketed lead core BMG bullets with plans to shot my bullets in next years fcsa matches
rant over for now
kd185
Thank you for giving us your insight. You defiantly have experience shooting .50s. I am no expert in ballistics but I do know some. I believe in my case I am good to go. I am in no way bashing what you have said. But let me see if I can address each of your concerns.
1: for powders, I am able to get my hands on yes military suplus powder for howitzer canons (it is not pull down. It is brand new) It is really slow stuff.
2: I am using a 20mm vulcan case necked down with approx 500 grains of powder capacity
3: I haven't completed the gun yet but I should be exceeding 3100 fps (not tested yet)
4: My barrel is 50" long
5 and 6: my twist rate is 1:10
7: yes recoil will be higher but my rig has a triple hydraulic dampner and spring system and the gun weighs 100lbs
8: With a projectile around that size a 1:11 ish twist is needed with the speeds i am hitting and I don't know how well the BC really is but time will tell.
9: I have read Litz book. It is very informative. It really shows how some bullet company's will only post G1 bc instead of G7 just because it is a higher number but it really doesn't represent it's true flight characteristics.
If you are curious here is a recent photo of my progress of building my gun. It isn't done yet but I have a .50bmg windrunner next to it to give a size comparison. The barrel isn't chambered yet. I just stuck it in the barrel shroud to give an idea of the size. There will be a muzzle break on it later.