Re: A I Wins Navy Mk13 Contract Award
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Formula350SD</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: BasraBoy</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
Personally I don't believe in playing politics with peoples' lives.
If your life depends on the quality of the equipment you carry and it's ability to do the job right every time you wouldn't give a flying f**k where it comes from....only that it performs and lasts.
AI have provided products that have proven this ability in many theaters of operation over a significant period of time in many different environments.
Be grateful that there are guys out there making decisions that still believe in furnishing your fighting forces with the best equipment money can buy....rather than what the accountants tell them they can have! </div></div>
You mean to tell me there isn't an American company that could produce just as high a quality a piece of equipment? Do you also mean to say that the screws, skins, and minor parts that they use from England couldn't be manufactured here?
Do you also mean to say that if say the Russians (arbitrarily chosen country) all the sudden started pumping out the best weapon systems we should commit to buying everything from them?
What happens if there is a major conflict and the supply chain goes belly up? Then where are you?
I swear there has been a presidential executive order, or an act by our congress that mandates our equipment come from within to prevent the exact scenario I stated above from happening, but I can't seem to find it. (I've been looking for over 2 hours)
I never made any negative comments about AI or their products, but to flat out say you don't care where our government procures it's equipment from is a mind bending statement to me.
</div></div>
Your argument is a disingenious use of hyperbole to force the available positions on this argument to their extremes. I could as easily say that if someone supports getting the best possible police car from a canadian plant that they then support ALL equipment a police officer ever use from that Canadian plant.
When it comes to equipment that puts down our enemies and protects our troops, I dont give a flying fuck whether the equipment is bought from the iraqis and afghanis themselves. If its the best out there [key criteria here], and we have a chance to buy the same stuff to put ourselves on a level playing field, so be it.
Lets examine the converse of your stated opinion. You believe that if the russians have equipment that is superior to our own, and in combat would be better prepared and potentially have capabilities more deadly than our own to offset our better training, you would NOT want to see what you could do about arming our people with that better equipment to get the edge back -- simply because it comes from another country?
Would I prefer that things are made in the US? Sure, of course I would. Do I think we should ever be in a position where our supply base is exclusively outside of the US for a certain type of widget? Hell no.
But the world did not leave all the clever people in the United States. Great ideas pop up all over. If the key to keeping our people safe and being able to put down those who would do them harm is buying a rifle chassis from a company located in another country, then so be it. IN this case, the fact that AI has US based factorys for some key components just sweetens the deal.