I don’t believe there is anything you can do with the 51T system to get what I was looking for. The lock up is not solid enough regardless of how tight the ratchet locks. There is too much play on the taper. It will not maintain zero if you take the suppressor off. If you take it off you need to rezero.Another way to get 'em to lock up tight is to buy ten mounts, send back the ones that don't lock up/don't need.
Does it suck to buy $1000 worth of mounts to pick one? Yeah, but you'll get the refund and you'll get a mount that does work and it won't require work or voiding the warranty with a modified mount.
So who handles this now if you have a baffle strike? ECCO or AAC? Or are you on the hook?
I'd like different mounts too. So I phased those out and went with Saker cans. I use the AAC cans on M4's and SBR's.
I’m not concerned with a baffle strike. It is a possibility with the 51T mounting system, I cannot see that happening with the Area 419 system. Once you screw the suppressor on it locks up solid and requires some effort to loosen it.
As far as I was concerned I didn’t have anything to lose making the upgrade and a good chance of gaining. My perspective is I paid about $300 to have the modification, repaint and adapter. My other option I was considering was purchasing an Ultra 9 for $1200 plus $200 tax and a year wait. I’m way ahead of the game. Do I think my AAC SD is equal to an Ultra 9? No, however I’m completely happy with what I have and do not think it is lacking or that I need to upgrade.
If I have a baffle strike it would be due to my error and I don’t expect someone else to take responsibility for my mistake.
I have two AAC suppressors, the AAC SD 7.62 and a AAC SD 5.56. I could never get the accuracy and repeatability from the 7.62 that I wanted for long range shooting. Since the conversion I’m very happy with it. I have repeatable zero, accuracy and quiet enough for me. I don’t see modifying the 5.56, however I’m not using it for the same purpose.