Does anyone know what the fastener situation is with the foreend bridge? It doesn’t come with any screws or anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Peter, Please check your email. I also have long bridges for At-X Rifles. DiannFDE from Mile High. They use to tell you what number I was in line, last I talked to them they won’t even do that. So I'm not sure where I even sit anymore. That last shipment AI posted at the latest should be to Mile High this week if I was allotted one or I’ll be on the shipment after that
Dibs!I will probably cerakote it, or sell it and buy a Vision chassis
Peter, Please check your email. I also have long bridges for At-X Rifles. DiannI’m glad someone took that red from
MHS because I was going to go to the redside tomorrow if I didn’t get other word on FDE. It’s been especially tempted because EuroOptic has the red bridges in stock too. Really want that FDE, and for the wait I’d rather get what I really want
Responded thank you greatlyPeter, Please check your email. I also have long bridges for At-X Rifles. Diann
Vision is a better chassis …I will probably cerakote it, or sell it and buy a Vision chassis
The screws are coming out Q4, FY24. But NoLegs has three prototype sets in different camo colors already.
How’s the vision compare to the at-xOh I don't care. Been rocking the real deal for over a year View attachment 7739010
Great comparison now I know lolIt was first
You have fde bridges ?Peter, Please check your email. I also have long bridges for At-X Rifles. Diann
HAHAHAHAHA first? First company in Norway to jump on the chassis bandwagon? First company to reverse engineer "their" exclusive design to use AICS mags? Lets see aluminum chassis fits every Remington clone known to mankind and.......tadah! Uses AICS mags, Original my assIt was first
I think he was referring to Sam's design for the AT/AX action that is now being produced by Vision (with minor tweaks), not Vision's in-house chassis.....HAHAHAHAHA first? First company in Norway to jump on the chassis bandwagon? First company to reverse engineer "their" exclusive design to use AICS mags? Lets see aluminum chassis fits every Remington clone known to mankind and.......tadah! Uses AICS mags, Original my ass
What do you mean by "the rail?" The chassis? I guess I'll find out when I get mine Sunday, but I'm not sure what they'd be doing in the absence of the bridge.Should be screws in the rail already.
I just spoke to Paul at WIN Tactical and he advises that the screws were omitted in shipping by mistake. WIN Tac has sent the bridge screws to both MHSA and Euro Optic. Give them a call if you ordered forend bridge that did not include the screws.The screws are coming out Q4, FY24. But NoLegs has three prototype sets in different camo colors already.
Don’t do it, we need more backordered elite sands pushed out.I just spoke to Paul at WIN Tactical and he advises that the screws were omitted in shipping by mistake. WIN Tac has sent the bridge screws to both MHSA and Euro Optic. Give them a call if you ordered forend bridge that did not include the screws.
-Scott
View attachment 7739182
I hope that batch of rifles posted on the 30th shows up soon. Finally have some time to go shoot.
HAHAHAHAHA first? First company in Norway to jump on the chassis bandwagon? First company to reverse engineer "their" exclusive design to use AICS mags? Lets see aluminum chassis fits every Remington clone known to mankind and.......tadah! Uses AICS mags, Original my ass
I'm not on the inside, so this is all postulation, but perhaps without the vision chassis, the AT-X wouldn't even exist.
Soooo without AI, that chassis wouldn't exist? LOL.
How about we let the sales do the talking??
I dig the buttstock though
Original "Sam Burns Accuracy Obsession" HAHAHAHAHAHA you guys kill me! Don't own one, don't really care for them, no dog in the fight. But according to you old Original Sam Burn's is the reason Accuracy International came out with the AT-X?I'm not suggesting one is better then the other, nor am I picking a side on this.
I don't own an AI, have shot and handled many of them, don't really care for them. I have no dog in this fight.
However, I do find the timing pretty interesting. There was obviously an interest in a more competition focused AI, but AI was always outspokenly reluctant to provide that. The Accuracy Obsession/Vision chassis comes along (with great fanfare/interest), and shortly after a competition focused AI is released. Interesting timing, however it may just be coincidence.
That's just speculation on my part, and I clearly labeled it as such.
Let's take a time out from "postulation" on who did what first. I have met Sam personally and helped him with parts for his personal rifles, and as far as I am aware he is still an AI fan and we at AI consider Sam a friend. I advised Sam at SHOT Show 2020 of where AI was in the R&D cycle on the AT-X and that we would have pre-production rifles by end of the year, which we did. Sam knew for a long time that we were developing a rifle for the competition shooting community.First company to produce a competition oriented chassis specifically for AI rifles (which is Sam Burns Accuracy Obsession chassis), as at the time AI expressed no interest in appeasing that market.
I would be remiss if I didn't mention that MPA made their chassis useable for the AI's for those that wanted that chassis, but the Vision chassis was the first chassis designed specifically for competition use with the AI.
I'm not on the inside, so this is all postulation, but perhaps without the vision chassis, the AT-X wouldn't even exist. Perhaps AI noticed that aftermarket companies were filling this specific role, and that was the poke AI needed to make their own in-house solution.
First company to produce a competition oriented chassis specifically for AI rifles (which is Sam Burns Accuracy Obsession chassis), as at the time AI expressed no interest in appeasing that market.
Original "Sam Burns Accuracy Obsession" HAHAHAHAHAHA you guys kill me! Don't own one, don't really care for them, no dog in the fight. But according to you old Original Sam Burn's is the reason Accuracy International came out with the AT-X?
Falls under the what can I pull out of my ass today
Let's take a time out from "postulation" on who did what first. I have met Sam personally and helped him with parts for his personal rifles, and as far as I am aware he is still an AI fan and we at AI consider Sam a friend. I advised Sam at SHOT Show 2020 of where AI was in the R&D cycle on the AT-X and that we would have pre-production rifles by end of the year, which we did. Sam knew for a long time that we were developing a rifle for the competition shooting community.
It is speculative to say the least what market(s) AI does or does not have an interest in. Most all of the companies that cater mainly to the competition shooting market did not spend 2.5 years developing a rifle for the ASR program and numerous other weapons programs globally. First draft sketches for the rifle that became the AT-X predate the ASR program and any ideas that Sam posted here or elsewhere. AI is not a huge company with unlimited R&D resources and significant military programs will always take priority.
If you have a personal beef with AI, please reach out to me privately and leave this thread for those genuinly interested in the AT-X.
I am not hard to reach.
-Scott Seigmund
It’s to offset the missing screws with the bridge.Bringing us back on track and want to ask those that have them. I know balance is suppose to be incredible as is, but want to ask how I’d everyone configuring weights either for balance, a wider Handguard profile or just to add weight? I’m planning on running a TBAC Ultra 7 full time and curious.
Excited for a full Just F’n Send It podcast episode about it.I heard GCP is developing tungsten screws for the AT-X bridge to fine-tune the rifle balance down to the grain.
All the aboveBringing us back on track and want to ask those that have them. I know balance is suppose to be incredible as is, but want to ask how I’d everyone configuring weights either for balance, a wider Handguard profile or just to add weight? I’m planning on running a TBAC Ultra 7 full time and curious.
The shots I fired with it were what you'd expect...completely accurate keyholes!
Was probably shooting ELDMs
@hic28 ....yessir...ELDM's; how'd you guess?
You're getting some ribbing because you were using the term keyhole in a positive way (I think you mean cloverleafs) when it's typically used to refer to over-rotated or understabilized bullets entering the target sideways and leaving a vaguely keyhole shape rather than a nice round hole. Eldm's have had an issue with coming apart in flight hence hic28's comment.@hic28 ....yessir...ELDM's; how'd you guess?
@AXMC Thanks for the info and link....wasn't aware of that issue with the ELDM's at the time I posted. Yes, I meant "cloverleafs" or nice round single hole.You're getting some ribbing because you were using the term keyhole in a positive way (I think you mean cloverleafs) when it's typically used to refer to over-rotated or understabilized bullets entering the target sideways and leaving a vaguely keyhole shape rather than a nice round hole. Eldm's have had an issue with coming apart in flight hence hic28's comment.
Range Report - Hornady 147 ELDM blowing up
Searched for 147 ELDM jacket separation or bullets blowing up/coming apart down range on here and one dead thread with 7 posts about the 147 and another on the 180 ELDMs. Over the past 2 weeks i've talked to at least 15 people who have experienced both factory Hornady 6.5PRC and reloads using...www.snipershide.com
Anyway, glad you got to shoot one and now, back to the AT-X !
Is the AT-X replacing the AX308?